Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. Mercury 2.5vsSeed 2.1 Turbo
Updated Sep 2026

Mercury 2.5vsSeed 2.1 Turbo

Mercury 2.5 is cheaper than Seed 2.1 Turbo at $0.04/M vs $0.5/M input tokens.

Mercury 2.5 and Seed 2.1 Turbo compared across 20 shared prompts
SpecMercury 2.5Seed 2.1 Turbo
Input price$0.04/M tokens$0.5/M tokens
Output price$0.15/M tokens$2.5/M tokens
Context window260K tokens262K tokens
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedSep 2026Aug 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 6 of the 20 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Simple 7-Ingredient Recipe

Create a simple recipe for a delicious dish (sweet or savory) using only 7 common pantry ingredients. Include a creative name for the dish…

Mercury 2.5190 words
Pantry Pasta Primavera Prep Time: 5 minutes Cook Time: 15 minutes Servings: 2 Ingredients (7 Common Pantry Items) Pasta (spaghetti, penne, or fusilli) – 8 oz Canned crushed tomatoes – 1 can (14 oz) Olive oil – 3 tablespoons Garlic powder – 1 teaspoon Dried oregano – 1 teaspoon Parmesan cheese (grated) – ½ cup Salt and…
Read the full answer
Seed 2.1 Turbo432 words
Dish Name: Pantry Lava Chickpea Crisp A cozy, savory one-skillet meal with bubbly garlicky tomato sauce studded with crispy chickpeas, topped with a crunchy spiced oat crumble. Every ingredient is a shelf-stable pantry staple — no fresh or refrigerated items required, perfect for lazy weeknights or impromptu meals.
Read the full answer

Explain Like I'm a Specific Expert

Explain how a large language model (like GPT or Claude) learns and generates text to each of these three audiences: 1. **An experienced…

Mercury 2.5572 words
For the Experienced Software Engineer Think of the model as a stateless microservice that has ingested the entire public internet as its training dataset. During the training phase, it performs a massive distributed optimization job, adjusting internal weights to minimize a loss function based on next-token prediction.
Read the full answer
Seed 2.1 Turbo1,837 words
Explanation for an experienced software engineer (skeptical of "predict the next word" as intelligence) Your skepticism is well-founded—on its face, “predict the next word” sounds like a fancy autocomplete you could hack together in a weekend with a trie and a corpus of Reddit comments.
Read the full answer

Historical Counterfactual Analysis

If the transistor had been invented in 1920 instead of 1947, trace the likely technological, economic, and geopolitical implications through…

Mercury 2.5660 words
Inventing the transistor in 1920 would have fundamentally reshaped the 20th century, compressing the digital age by roughly two decades. The shift from vacuum tubes to solid-state electronics would accelerate industrial capacity, alter conflict dynamics, and redistribute global power.
Read the full answer
Seed 2.1 Turbo2,068 words
Counterfactual: Transistor Invented in 1920 (vs. 1947 OTL) The 1920 invention of the point-contact transistor (assumed to emerge from Western Electric’s telephone repeater R&D, 5 years before Bell Labs’ formal founding) would not simply shift all tech 27 years forward: progress would be slowed by the Great Depression’s…
Read the full answer

Michelin Star Recipe Design

Design an innovative recipe for a multi-component dish worthy of a Michelin 3-star restaurant. The recipe should feature an unusual…

Mercury 2.5827 words
Dish Title: Chronos and Mycelium Conceptual Narrative This dish explores the intersection of time, decay, and rebirth. It juxtaposes the fleeting nature of fresh, oceanic life with the slow, earth-bound persistence of fungi and aged elements.
Read the full answer
Seed 2.1 Turbo1,988 words
Dish: Linea di Marea (Tide Line): Pine Forest on the Sea Michelin 3-Star Tasting Menu Course 5 Serves 24 Vegetarian Adaptation Available Conceptual Narrative This dish is a sensory memoir of Chef Elara Voss’s childhood summers in Manarola, Cinque Terre, where her nonna ran a seaside trattoria.
Read the full answer

Adversarial Contract Review

Here is a contract for a software consulting engagement: --- SOFTWARE CONSULTING AGREEMENT This Agreement is entered into between TechCorp…

Mercury 2.5501 words
Here is an analysis of the contract clauses that pose significant risk to the contractor, along with suggested modifications and legal reasoning. Scope and Compensation (Clause 1) Risk: The client can expand the project indefinitely without paying extra.
Read the full answer
Seed 2.1 Turbo1,851 words
This analysis is general in nature and not a substitute for legal advice from a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction, as contract law varies significantly by location and context. Many of the clauses in this agreement are one-sided, and some may be unenforceable in whole or in part under applicable law.
Read the full answer

Beginner's Longevity Plan

Outline a simple, actionable 1-month plan for someone starting their journey towards better health and longevity. Focus on 3 key areas…

Mercury 2.5325 words
Here is a simple, actionable 1-month plan to kickstart your journey toward better health and longevity. This guide focuses on three foundational pillars: Nutrition, Movement, and Sleep. Week 1: Awareness & Small Wins Goal: Build habits without overwhelming yourself.
Read the full answer
Seed 2.1 Turbo1,433 words
1-Month Beginner Longevity Plan Who This Is For People with zero consistent health routine, busy schedules, no gym access, and no desire for restrictive diets or extreme changes. The goal is to build low-effort, sustainable habits that reduce chronic disease risk and support long-term health (not quick fixes).
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
Mercury 2.5
Mercury 2.5
Seed 2.1 Turbo
Seed 2.1 Turbo

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, nothing separates them.

Mercury 2.5 costs 17x less per token.

Too close to call

Reviewing agent-written code?See a Brief PR report

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Mercury 2.5
Input
$0.04
13× cheaper
Output
$0.15
17× cheaper
Seed 2.1 Turbo
Input
$0.50
Output
$2.50

Mercury 2.5 is cheaper on both: 13× input, 17× output.

Where to run it

2 hosts

Mercury 2.51 host
HostInOutContextUptime
Inception$0.04 in·$0.15 out·260k·100% up
Seed 2.1 Turbo1 host
HostInOutContextUptime
ByteDance Seedfp8$0.50 in·$2.50 out·262k·99.9% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 22 Sep 2026.

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Mercury 2.5 is developed by Inception while Seed 2.1 Turbo is developed by ByteDance. Mercury 2.5 has a 260K token context window vs Seed 2.1 Turbo's 262K. You can compare their actual outputs across 20 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. Mercury 2.5 and Seed 2.1 Turbo each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 20 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

Mercury 2.5 costs $0.04/M input tokens and Seed 2.1 Turbo costs $0.5/M input tokens. Mercury 2.5 is $0.46/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Mercury 2.5 and Seed 2.1 Turbo across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

Mercury 2.5 logoDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp logo
Mercury 2.5 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpLanded Sep 2026
Seed 2.1 Turbo logoSolar Pro 4 logo
Seed 2.1 Turbo vs Solar Pro 4Landed Sep 2026
Mercury 2.5 logoHy3 logo
Mercury 2.5 vs Hy3Landed Sep 2026
Seed 2.1 Turbo logoQwen3.7 Flash logo
Seed 2.1 Turbo vs Qwen3.7 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Mercury 2.5 logoLing 3.0 Flash logo
Mercury 2.5 vs Ling 3.0 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Seed 2.1 Turbo logoMuse Glimmer 30B logo
Seed 2.1 Turbo vs Muse Glimmer 30BLanded Sep 2026
Mercury 2.5 logoGLM 5.3 logo
Mercury 2.5 vs GLM 5.3Landed Sep 2026
Seed 2.1 Turbo logoTernary Bonsai 2 27B logo
Seed 2.1 Turbo vs Ternary Bonsai 2 27BLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

Mercury 2.5 logoMercury 2.5 Preview logo
Mercury 2.5 vs Mercury 2.5 PreviewSame lab
Mercury 2.5 logoMercury logo
Mercury 2.5 vs MercurySame lab
Seed 2.1 Turbo logoSeed 2.0 Code logo
Seed 2.1 Turbo vs Seed 2.0 CodeVersion compare
Seed 2.1 Turbo logoSeed 2.0 Lite logo
Seed 2.1 Turbo vs Seed 2.0 LiteVersion compare
Mercury 2.5 logoQwen3.5 Flash logo
Mercury 2.5 vs Qwen3.5 FlashNew provider
Mercury 2.5 logoQwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 logo
Mercury 2.5 vs Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15New provider
Mercury 2.5 logoQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 logo
Mercury 2.5 vs Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20New provider
Mercury 2.5 logoQwen3.6 27B logo
Mercury 2.5 vs Qwen3.6 27BNew provider

Model pages

Mercury 2.5 logo
Mercury 2.520 outputs, specs and price
Seed 2.1 Turbo logo
Seed 2.1 Turbo58 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed