Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. MiMo-V2-ProvsQwen3.8 Max Prime
Updated Sep 2026

MiMo-V2-ProvsQwen3.8 Max Prime

MiMo-V2-Pro is cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max Prime at $1/M vs $4/M input tokens.

MiMo-V2-Pro and Qwen3.8 Max Prime compared across 19 shared prompts
SpecMiMo-V2-ProQwen3.8 Max Prime
Input price$1/M tokens$4/M tokens
Output price$3/M tokens$12/M tokens
Context window1.0M tokens1.0M tokens
Weights—Closed
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedMar 2026Sep 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 6 of the 19 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Mini LBO Underwrite

You are underwriting a 5-year LBO for a private equity investment committee. Company (fictional): HarborTech Services (HTS) –…

MiMo-V2-Pro398 words
HarborTech Services (HTS) LBO Analysis 1. Year-by-Year Projections (FY2026–FY2030) (All figures in $m, rounded to one decimal) Year Revenue EBITDA Cash Interest (TL) Cash Interest (Mezz) Total Cash Interest Cash Taxes Capex ΔNWC FCF After Debt Service¹ Ending TL Ending Mezz 2026 972.0 136.1 43.2 21.6 64.8 17.8 29.2 0.4…
Read the full answer
Qwen3.8 Max Prime673 words
HarborTech Services (HTS) – LBO Underwriting Memo Entry & Capital Structure Item Amount FY2025 EBITDA $120.0m Entry Multiple 12.0x Enterprise Value $1,440.0m Transaction Fees (2.0% of EV) $28.8m Total Uses $1,468.8m Term Loan (4.0x, 9.0% cash, 1.0% amort) $480.0m Mezzanine (1.5x, 12.0% cash + 2.0% PIK) $180.0m Sponsor…
Read the full answer

Simple 7-Ingredient Recipe

Create a simple recipe for a delicious dish (sweet or savory) using only 7 common pantry ingredients. Include a creative name for the dish…

MiMo-V2-Pro233 words
Sunshine Pasta Bake 🍝✨ A cozy, cheesy pasta dish that brings warmth to any table with simple pantry staples. Ingredients (7 total) Pasta (8 oz / 225g) – penne or fusilli work well Canned diced tomatoes (14 oz / 400g) Garlic (3 cloves, minced) Olive oil (2 tablespoons) Dried oregano (1 teaspoon) Salt (to taste)…
Read the full answer
Qwen3.8 Max Prime223 words
🍯 Golden Hour Noodles A sweet, savory, garlicky pasta that tastes like it took way more effort than it did. Ingredients (7) # Ingredient Amount 1 Spaghetti 8 oz (half a box) 2 Butter 3 tablespoons 3 Garlic, minced 4 cloves 4 Honey 2 tablespoons 5 Soy sauce 1 tablespoon 6 Red pepper flakes ½ teaspoon 7 Parmesan cheese…
Read the full answer

Debug This Architecture

Here's the architecture for a real-time collaborative document editor (like Google Docs): **System Overview:** - Frontend: React SPA with…

MiMo-V2-Pro1,274 words
This is a great exercise. Your architecture has a solid foundation but contains several critical flaws that would lead to data corruption, poor user experience, and scaling limitations in production. Let's break them down. 1.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.8 Max Prime2,271 words
Architecture Analysis: Failure Modes, Race Conditions & Scaling Bottlenecks SYNC & CONSISTENCY LAYER 1.1 Last-Write-Wins with Client Clocks (Critical) Failure Mode: Client clocks are unreliable. A user with a clock skewed +5 minutes will always "win" conflicts.
Read the full answer

Explain Like I'm a Specific Expert

Explain how a large language model (like GPT or Claude) learns and generates text to each of these three audiences: 1. **An experienced…

MiMo-V2-Pro1,058 words
For the Experienced Software Engineer Think of a large language model not as a reasoning engine, but as an extraordinarily sophisticated, lossy compression and interpolation engine for human-generated text and code.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.8 Max Prime1,147 words
For the Software Engineer Think of it this way: you've built systems where simple rules at the node level produce emergent behavior at the system level — consensus protocols, eventual consistency, cellular automata-like patterns in distributed state machines. An LLM is a similar phenomenon at a different scale.
Read the full answer

Michelin Star Recipe Design

Design an innovative recipe for a multi-component dish worthy of a Michelin 3-star restaurant. The recipe should feature an unusual…

MiMo-V2-Pro653 words
"Umami Nocturne" A study in shadow and light, pairing black garlic with white chocolate, sea and earth, crisp and molten. Conceptual Narrative This dish explores the duality of umami—both the deep, fermented earthiness of black garlic and the saline, mineral brininess of abalone.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.8 Max Prime1,844 words
"Petrichor" The Forest Floor After Rain Conceptual Narrative Petrichor — from the Greek petra (stone) and ichor (the fluid that flows in the veins of the gods) — is the scent produced when rain falls on dry earth.
Read the full answer

Adversarial Contract Review

Here is a contract for a software consulting engagement: --- SOFTWARE CONSULTING AGREEMENT This Agreement is entered into between TechCorp…

MiMo-V2-Pro1,082 words
This agreement contains numerous clauses that are heavily one-sided and could expose the contractor to significant financial and legal risk. Below is a breakdown of the most exploitable clauses, suggested modifications, and the legal reasoning behind the changes.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.8 Max Prime2,126 words
Contract Analysis: Exploitative Clauses & Recommended Modifications Executive Summary This agreement is severely one-sided in favor of the Client. Nearly every clause shifts risk, cost, or obligation onto the Contractor while granting the Client broad unilateral rights. Below is a clause-by-clause breakdown.
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
MiMo-V2-Pro
MiMo-V2-Pro
Qwen3.8 Max Prime
Qwen3.8 Max Prime

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, nothing separates them.

MiMo-V2-Pro costs 4.0x less per token.

Too close to call

Reviewing agent-written code?See a Brief PR report

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

MiMo-V2-Pro
Input
$1.00
4.0× cheaper
Output
$3.00
4.0× cheaper
Qwen3.8 Max Prime
Input
$4.00
Output
$12.00

MiMo-V2-Pro is cheaper on both: 4.0× input, 4.0× output.

Where to run it

1 host

MiMo-V2-Pro

No hosts listed on OpenRouter.

Qwen3.8 Max Prime1 host
HostInOutContextUptime
Alibaba Cloud$4.00 in·$12.00 out·1M·99.9% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 25 Sep 2026.

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

MiMo-V2-Pro is developed by Xiaomi while Qwen3.8 Max Prime is developed by Qwen. MiMo-V2-Pro has a 1.0M token context window vs Qwen3.8 Max Prime's 1.0M. You can compare their actual outputs across 19 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. MiMo-V2-Pro and Qwen3.8 Max Prime each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 19 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

MiMo-V2-Pro costs $1/M input tokens and Qwen3.8 Max Prime costs $4/M input tokens. MiMo-V2-Pro is $3.00/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of MiMo-V2-Pro and Qwen3.8 Max Prime across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

MiMo-V2-Pro logoSolar Mini 4 logo
MiMo-V2-Pro vs Solar Mini 4Landed Sep 2026
Qwen3.8 Max Prime logoGLM 5.3 Prime logo
Qwen3.8 Max Prime vs GLM 5.3 PrimeLanded Sep 2026
MiMo-V2-Pro logoQwen3.8 Omni Flash logo
MiMo-V2-Pro vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3.8 Max Prime logoCommand A+ logo
Qwen3.8 Max Prime vs Command A+Landed Sep 2026
MiMo-V2-Pro logoClaude Opus 5.5 logo
MiMo-V2-Pro vs Claude Opus 5.5Landed Sep 2026
Qwen3.8 Max Prime logoGPT-6 Luna Pro logo
Qwen3.8 Max Prime vs GPT-6 Luna ProLanded Sep 2026
MiMo-V2-Pro logoGPT-6 Sol Pro logo
MiMo-V2-Pro vs GPT-6 Sol ProLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3.8 Max Prime logoGPT-6 Luna logo
Qwen3.8 Max Prime vs GPT-6 LunaLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

MiMo-V2-Pro logoMiMo-V2.6-Pro logo
MiMo-V2-Pro vs MiMo-V2.6-ProSame lab
MiMo-V2-Pro logoMiMo-V2.6-Flash logo
MiMo-V2-Pro vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashSame lab
Qwen3.8 Max Prime logoQwen3.8 Omni Flash logo
Qwen3.8 Max Prime vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashSame lab
Qwen3.8 Max Prime logoQwen3.7 Flash logo
Qwen3.8 Max Prime vs Qwen3.7 FlashSame lab
MiMo-V2-Pro logoQwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct logo
MiMo-V2-Pro vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B InstructCross-provider
MiMo-V2-Pro logoQwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking logo
MiMo-V2-Pro vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B ThinkingCross-provider
MiMo-V2-Pro logoQwen3.5 122B A10B logo
MiMo-V2-Pro vs Qwen3.5 122B A10BCross-provider
MiMo-V2-Pro logoQwen3.5 27B logo
MiMo-V2-Pro vs Qwen3.5 27BCross-provider

Model pages

MiMo-V2-Pro logo
MiMo-V2-Pro58 outputs, specs and price
Qwen3.8 Max Prime logo
Qwen3.8 Max Prime19 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed