MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs Qwen: Qwen3.5 35B A3B
Compare MiMo-V2.5-Pro by Xiaomi against Qwen: Qwen3.5 35B A3B by Qwen, context windows of 1.0M vs 262K, tested across 52 shared challenges.
Our Verdict
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Qwen: Qwen3.5 35B A3BRunner-up
No community votes yet. On paper, MiMo-V2.5-Pro has the edge — bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window.
Slight edge
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Input
$1.00
Output
$3.00
Qwen: Qwen3.5 35B A3B
Input
$0.25
4.0× cheaper
Output
$2.00
1.5× cheaper
Qwen: Qwen3.5 35B A3B is cheaper on both — 4.0× input, 1.5× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
37%
MiMo-V2.5-Pro uses 62.5x more emoji
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Qwen: Qwen3.5 35B A3B
58%Vocabulary51%
22wSentence Length15w
0.61Hedging0.39
5.7Bold6.8
3.1Lists4.8
0.63Emoji0.00
1.40Headings0.84
0.02Transitions0.14
Based on 27 + 23 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
Common questions
Keep exploring
