MiniMax M2.5vsQwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is cheaper than MiniMax M2.5 at $0.071/M vs $0.3/M input tokens.
| Spec | MiniMax M2.5 | Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.3/M tokens | $0.071/M tokens |
| Output price | $1.2/M tokens | $0.285/M tokens |
| Context window | 205K tokens | 262K tokens |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Feb 2026 | Aug 2025 |
Our Verdict
MiniMax M2.5
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, nothing separates them.
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 costs 4.2x less per token.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
MiniMax M2.5
Input
$0.30
Output
$1.20
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
Input
$0.07
4.2× cheaper
Output
$0.28
4.2× cheaper
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is cheaper on both: 4.2× input, 4.2× output.
Where to run it
8 hosts, cheapest first
MiniMax M2.57 hosts
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 25071 host
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 9 Sep 2026.
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
52%
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 uses 61.2x more emoji
MiniMax M2.5
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
55%Vocabulary52%
25wSentence Length15w
0.58Hedging0.20
6.0Bold7.0
4.4Lists4.2
0.01Emoji0.89
1.11Headings0.91
0.16Transitions0.10
Based on 23 + 28 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
Common questions
Keep exploring
More comparisons
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs MiniMax M2.7Cross-provider
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs Ox AlphaNew provider
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs MiniMax M3Cross-provider
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs Aurora AlphaNew provider
MiniMax M2.5 vs GPT OSS 120BNew provider
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs GPT OSS 20BNew provider
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs Granite 4.2 8BNew provider
MiniMax M2.5 vs Grok 3New provider