Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. MiniMax M2.7vsSolar Pro 4
Updated Aug 2026

MiniMax M2.7vsSolar Pro 4

Solar Pro 4 is cheaper than MiniMax M2.7 at $0.09/M vs $0.3/M input tokens.

MiniMax M2.7 and Solar Pro 4 compared across 14 shared prompts
SpecMiniMax M2.7Solar Pro 4
Input price$0.3/M tokens$0.09/M tokens
Output price$1.2/M tokens$0.36/M tokens
Context window205K tokens524K tokens
WeightsOpen—
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedMar 2026Aug 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 6 of the 14 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders

You're the CEO of a pharmaceutical company. Your best-selling drug ($2B annual revenue, used by 4 million patients for chronic pain) has…

MiniMax M2.71,980 words
Crisis Response Action Plan: 48-Hour Framework Executive Summary The right course of action is clear: disclose transparently, protect patients immediately, and engage regulators urgently. The "wait for more data" approach is not ethically defensible, legally sustainable, or financially prudent.
Read the full answer
Solar Pro 41,851 words
As CEO, my overriding duty is to balance patient safety, legal/regulatory compliance, fiduciary responsibility, and long-term corporate survival. A 1-in-8,000 risk of liver failure is rare but severe, potentially fatal, and materially unexpected relative to the current label.
Read the full answer

Simple 7-Ingredient Recipe

Create a simple recipe for a delicious dish (sweet or savory) using only 7 common pantry ingredients. Include a creative name for the dish…

MiniMax M2.7417 words
“Golden Harvest Chickpea Stew” Hearty, spiced, and ready in about 40 minutes—perfect for a quick weeknight dinner using only pantry staples. Item Details Prep Time 10 minutes Cook Time 30 minutes Total Time 40 minutes Servings 4 (about 1 ½ cups each) Vegan / Gluten‑Free Yes (just make sure your canned goods are…
Read the full answer
Solar Pro 4294 words
🍝 Golden Umami Silk Noodles A savory-sweet pasta dish that transforms basic pantry staples into a glossy, flavorful meal. It's quick, comforting, and relies on the balance of soy, honey, and butter for a rich sauce without needing fresh produce.
Read the full answer

Advanced Investment Memo (IC Memo)

You are writing an internal investment committee memo for a long/short equity fund. Company (fictional): LedgerLift (ticker: LLLT) – B2B…

MiniMax M2.71,240 words
MEMORANDUM To: Investment Committee From: Analyst Coverage – SaaS/Enterprise Software Date: June 2026 Re: LedgerLift (LLLT) – Initiating Coverage Recommendation & Price Target Recommendation 12‑Month PT Range 2‑Sentence Thesis SHORT $30 – $38 LedgerLift’s best‑in‑class SaaS metrics (123 % NRR, 94 % gross retention)…
Read the full answer
Solar Pro 41,052 words
INTERNAL MEMO – INVESTMENT COMMITTEE TO: IC Members FROM: Long/Short Equity Desk DATE: Oct 2024 SUBJECT: LedgerLift (LLLT) – Initiation / Long Recommendation & Thesis Recommendation: LONG 12-Month PT Range: $52–$58 (Base case ~$54, Bull ~$68, Bear ~$38) Thesis: LedgerLift is a structurally advantaged mid-market AP…
Read the full answer

Startup Pitch Teardown

Here's a pitch deck summary for a startup called "MindMeld AI": **Slide 1 - Vision:** "We're building the future of human-AI collaboration.…

MiniMax M2.71,561 words
Below are the three claims in the MindMeld AI deck that are most likely to raise red‑flags with a savvy investor. For each one I’ll spell out exactly why the statement is weak and then give a concrete, actionable fix you can use to back it up or re‑frame it.
Read the full answer
Solar Pro 41,009 words
Here are the three weakest claims in the MindMeld AI pitch deck, along with an analysis of why they undermine credibility and specific recommendations for improvement. The Technical Performance Claim Claim: "Our proprietary EEG headband uses advanced ML to decode neural patterns into text with 94% accuracy...
Read the full answer

Debug This Architecture

Here's the architecture for a real-time collaborative document editor (like Google Docs): **System Overview:** - Frontend: React SPA with…

MiniMax M2.71,586 words
Architecture Analysis: Real-Time Collaborative Document Editor Your architecture contains fundamental design issues that will cause data loss, inconsistency, and scaling failures under real-world conditions. Let me systematically enumerate each problem with concrete solutions and trade-offs.
Read the full answer
Solar Pro 41,598 words
This architecture contains several fundamental mismatches between real-time collaborative editing requirements and the chosen patterns. Below is a systematic breakdown of failure modes, race conditions, and scaling bottlenecks, each with a targeted solution and explicit trade-offs.
Read the full answer

Adversarial Contract Review

Here is a contract for a software consulting engagement: --- SOFTWARE CONSULTING AGREEMENT This Agreement is entered into between TechCorp…

MiniMax M2.71,727 words
Contract Analysis: Exploitative Clauses for Contractors This agreement contains numerous provisions heavily weighted in the Client's favor. Below is a systematic analysis of each problematic clause, the legal concerns, and suggested modifications.
Read the full answer
Solar Pro 41,382 words
Disclaimer: I am an AI assistant and not an attorney. The following analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Contract laws vary significantly by jurisdiction (e.g., state, country).
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
Solar Pro 4
Solar Pro 4
MiniMax M2.7
MiniMax M2.7Runner-up

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Solar Pro 4 has the edge: newer, bigger context window.

Solar Pro 4 costs 3.3x less per token.

Too close to call
API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

MiniMax M2.7
Input
$0.30
Output
$1.20
Solar Pro 4
Input
$0.09
3.3× cheaper
Output
$0.36
3.3× cheaper

Solar Pro 4 is cheaper on both: 3.3× input, 3.3× output.

Where to run it

9 hosts, cheapest first

MiniMax M2.78 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
GGMI Cloudfp8$0.21 in·$0.84 out·197k·99.4% upNNovitafp8$0.27 in·$1.08 out·205k·99.1% upAAtlasCloudfp8$0.30 in·$1.20 out·197k·98.7% upMiniMaxfp8$0.30 in·$1.20 out·205k·99.6% upDDeepInfrafp8$0.38 in·$1.70 out·197k·83.9% upGroq$0.60 in·$1.80 out·197k·99.4% up
2 more hostsFewer hosts
SSambaNova$0.60 in·$2.40 out·197k·98.6% upMMaradegraded$0.24 in·$0.96 out·197k·92.3% up
Solar Pro 41 host
HostInOutContextUptime
UUpstage$0.09 in·$0.36 out·524k·99.7% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 23 Sep 2026.

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

MiniMax M2.7 is developed by MiniMax while Solar Pro 4 is developed by Upstage. MiniMax M2.7 has a 205K token context window vs Solar Pro 4's 524K. You can compare their actual outputs across 14 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. MiniMax M2.7 and Solar Pro 4 each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 14 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

MiniMax M2.7 costs $0.3/M input tokens and Solar Pro 4 costs $0.09/M input tokens. Solar Pro 4 is $0.21/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of MiniMax M2.7 and Solar Pro 4 across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

MiniMax M2.7 logoDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp logo
MiniMax M2.7 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpLanded Sep 2026
Solar Pro 4 logoHy3 logo
Solar Pro 4 vs Hy3Landed Sep 2026
MiniMax M2.7 logoQwen3.7 Flash logo
MiniMax M2.7 vs Qwen3.7 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Solar Pro 4 logoLing 3.0 Flash logo
Solar Pro 4 vs Ling 3.0 FlashLanded Sep 2026
MiniMax M2.7 logoMuse Glimmer 30B logo
MiniMax M2.7 vs Muse Glimmer 30BLanded Sep 2026
Solar Pro 4 logoGLM 5.3 logo
Solar Pro 4 vs GLM 5.3Landed Sep 2026
MiniMax M2.7 logoTernary Bonsai 2 27B logo
MiniMax M2.7 vs Ternary Bonsai 2 27BLanded Sep 2026
Solar Pro 4 logoGLM 5.3 Flash logo
Solar Pro 4 vs GLM 5.3 FlashLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

MiniMax M2.7 logoMiniMax M2.5 logo
MiniMax M2.7 vs MiniMax M2.5Version compare
MiniMax M2.7 logoMiniMax M3 logo
MiniMax M2.7 vs MiniMax M3Version compare
Solar Pro 4 logoSolar Pro 3 logo
Solar Pro 4 vs Solar Pro 3Same lab
Solar Pro 4 logoOx Alpha logo
Solar Pro 4 vs Ox AlphaSame size
Solar Pro 4 logoLlama 3.1 405B logo
Solar Pro 4 vs Llama 3.1 405BNew provider
Solar Pro 4 logoLlama 3.1 70B (Instruct) logo
Solar Pro 4 vs Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct)Same size
Solar Pro 4 logoLlama 4 Maverick logo
Solar Pro 4 vs Llama 4 MaverickNew provider
Solar Pro 4 logoLlama 4 Scout logo
Solar Pro 4 vs Llama 4 ScoutNew provider

Model pages

MiniMax M2.7 logo
MiniMax M2.753 outputs, specs and price
Solar Pro 4 logo
Solar Pro 414 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed