Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. MiniMax M3vsQwen3.8 Max (0902)
Updated Sep 2026

MiniMax M3vsQwen3.8 Max (0902)

MiniMax M3 is cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max (0902) at $0.3/M vs $2/M input tokens.

MiniMax M3 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902) compared across 10 shared prompts
SpecMiniMax M3Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Input price$0.3/M tokens$2/M tokens
Output price$1.2/M tokens$6/M tokens
Context window1.0M tokens1.0M tokens
WeightsOpenClosed
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedJun 2026Sep 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 5 of the 10 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Simple 7-Ingredient Recipe

Create a simple recipe for a delicious dish (sweet or savory) using only 7 common pantry ingredients. Include a creative name for the dish…

MiniMax M3287 words
🌟 Sun-Kissed Honey Glazed Carrots 🌟 A sweet-savory side dish that turns humble carrots into a glossy, crowd-pleasing showstopper. Ingredients (7 Pantry Staples) Carrots – 1 lb, peeled and cut into 2-inch diagonal pieces Butter – 3 tablespoons Honey – 2 tablespoons Garlic – 3 cloves, minced Salt – ½ teaspoon Black…
Read the full answer
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)230 words
🍯 Midnight Crispy Chickpea Bowl A sweet-savory, crispy rice bowl that comes together faster than delivery. Ingredients (7) # Ingredient Amount 1 Canned chickpeas (drained & patted dry) 1 can (15 oz) 2 Soy sauce 3 tbsp 3 Honey 2 tbsp 4 Garlic (minced) 3 cloves 5 Vegetable oil 2 tbsp 6 Instant or leftover cooked rice 2…
Read the full answer

Beginner's Longevity Plan

Outline a simple, actionable 1-month plan for someone starting their journey towards better health and longevity. Focus on 3 key areas…

MiniMax M3644 words
🌱 Your 1-Month Health & Longevity Starter Plan The best plan is one you can actually stick to. This 4-week guide focuses on three foundational pillars — the ones with the biggest impact on how you feel today and how well you age over decades. Each week builds gently on the last.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)536 words
The 30-Day Foundation Plan Core principle: Don't overhaul your life. Layer small wins that compound. 🏃 Area 1: Movement The goal isn't fitness. It's making your body a place you want to live in. Week 1 — Build the trigger Walk 15 minutes daily (same time each day to build the habit) No gym. No gear.
Read the full answer

Debug This Architecture

Here's the architecture for a real-time collaborative document editor (like Google Docs): **System Overview:** - Frontend: React SPA with…

MiniMax M31,434 words
Architectural Review: Real-Time Collaborative Document Editor This architecture has several critical flaws that would manifest as data loss, poor UX, and a system that breaks down at modest scale. I'll group findings by severity.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)477 words
Architecture Failure Analysis: Real-Time Collaborative Editor Critical Issues (Data Loss / Correctness) Last-Write-Wins with Client Clocks — Fundamental Data Loss Problem: Client clocks are unreliable. They drift, can be manually set, and differ across timezones.
Read the full answer

Explain Like I'm a Specific Expert

Explain how a large language model (like GPT or Claude) learns and generates text to each of these three audiences: 1. **An experienced…

MiniMax M31,248 words
For the experienced software engineer Here's the cleanest way to think about it: a frontier LLM is a lossy compression of the training corpus, and inference is querying that compressed representation.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)1,046 words
For the Experienced Software Engineer Think of an LLM as a lossy compression function trained on a massive corpus. During training, you're essentially building a statistical model of "given this sequence of tokens, what's the probability distribution over the next token?"
Read the full answer

Startup Pitch Teardown

Here's a pitch deck summary for a startup called "MindMeld AI": **Slide 1 - Vision:** "We're building the future of human-AI collaboration.…

MiniMax M3941 words
Three Weakest Claims in the MindMeld AI Pitch Slide 3: "94% accuracy… Works with any language, any device" Why it's weak: This is the most technically implausible claim in the deck, and the kind of line that causes sophisticated investors (especially those with BCI or ML backgrounds) to stop reading.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)582 words
The 3 Weakest Claims in the MindMeld AI Pitch The TAM Claim: "$180B" (Slide 4) Why it's weak: This is a textbook case of TAM inflation that immediately undermines credibility with any experienced investor.
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
MiniMax M3
MiniMax M3
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, nothing separates them.

MiniMax M3 costs 5.0x less per token.

Too close to call
API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

MiniMax M3
Input
$0.30
6.7× cheaper
Output
$1.20
5.0× cheaper
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Input
$2.00
Output
$6.00

MiniMax M3 is cheaper on both: 6.7× input, 5.0× output.

Where to run it

14 hosts, cheapest first

MiniMax M313 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
CCoreWeavefp4$0.23 in·$0.96 out·262k·99.4% upGGMI Cloudfp8$0.24 in·$0.96 out·1M·99.6% upDDeepInfrafp8$0.28 in·$1.10 out·524k·99.1% upAAtlasCloudfp8$0.30 in·$1.20 out·524k·96% upMiniMaxfp8$0.30 in·$1.20 out·524k·98.8% upNNovitafp8$0.30 in·$1.20 out·1M·99.2% up
7 more hostsFewer hosts
SStreamLakefp8$0.30 in·$1.20 out·1M·98.9% upTTogether$0.30 in·$1.20 out·524k·99.9% upMMara$0.60 in·$2.40 out·1M·91.6% upSSambaNova$0.60 in·$2.40 out·1M·97.8% upMModelRunfp4$0.75 in·$3.00 out·1M·99.9% upPParasailfp8degraded$0.30 in·$1.20 out·1M·95.8% upVVenicefp8degraded$0.30 in·$1.20 out·524k·65.4% up
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)1 host
HostInOutContextUptime
Alibaba Cloud$2.00 in·$6.00 out·1M·100% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 23 Sep 2026.

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

MiniMax M3 is developed by MiniMax while Qwen3.8 Max (0902) is developed by Qwen. MiniMax M3 has a 1.0M token context window vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)'s 1.0M. You can compare their actual outputs across 10 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. MiniMax M3 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902) each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 10 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

MiniMax M3 costs $0.3/M input tokens and Qwen3.8 Max (0902) costs $2/M input tokens. MiniMax M3 is $1.70/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of MiniMax M3 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902) across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

MiniMax M3 logoDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp logo
MiniMax M3 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) logoSolar Pro 4 logo
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Solar Pro 4Landed Sep 2026
MiniMax M3 logoHy3 logo
MiniMax M3 vs Hy3Landed Sep 2026
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) logoQwen3.7 Flash logo
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Qwen3.7 FlashLanded Sep 2026
MiniMax M3 logoLing 3.0 Flash logo
MiniMax M3 vs Ling 3.0 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) logoMuse Glimmer 30B logo
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Muse Glimmer 30BLanded Sep 2026
MiniMax M3 logoGLM 5.3 logo
MiniMax M3 vs GLM 5.3Landed Sep 2026
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) logoTernary Bonsai 2 27B logo
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Ternary Bonsai 2 27BLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

MiniMax M3 logoMiniMax M2.7 logo
MiniMax M3 vs MiniMax M2.7Version compare
MiniMax M3 logoMiniMax M2.5 logo
MiniMax M3 vs MiniMax M2.5Version compare
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) logoQwen3.8 Flash logo
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Qwen3.8 FlashSame lab
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) logoQwen3.8 2.4T A95B logo
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95BSame lab
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) logoGPT-5.6 Sol logo
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs GPT-5.6 SolNew provider
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) logoGPT-5.6 Terra logo
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs GPT-5.6 TerraSame size
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) logoGPT-6 Astra logo
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs GPT-6 AstraNew provider
MiniMax M3 logoGPT-6 Astra Pro logo
MiniMax M3 vs GPT-6 Astra ProNew provider

Model pages

MiniMax M3 logo
MiniMax M357 outputs, specs and price
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) logo
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)10 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed