Updated Apr 28, 2025

Our Verdict

Qwen3 235B A22B

Mistral LargeRunner-up

No community votes yet. On paper, Qwen3 235B A22B has the edge — bigger model tier, newer.

Too close to call

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity

86%

Mistral Large uses 86.0x more hedging

Mistral Large

Qwen3 235B A22B

49%Vocabulary68%

19wSentence Length9w

0.86Hedging0.00

8.9Bold5.8

5.4Lists3.7

0.31Emoji0.74

1.01Headings0.00

0.10Transitions0.12

Based on 16 + 2 text responses

vs

Ask them anything yourself

Mistral Large

Qwen3 235B A22B

279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.

We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.

AI Hallucination Index 2026

Free preview13 of 58 slides

Download the free preview or get all 58 slides for $49

FAQ

Common questions

Keep going

Mistral Large vs MiniMax M2.5New provider

Mistral Large vs Aurora AlphaNew provider

Mistral Large vs Grok 3New provider

Mistral LargevsQwen3 235B A22B

24 fights queued

Why Mistral Large?

Dead even. This one's a coin flip.

Why Qwen3 235B A22B?

14 months newerApr 2025

Mistral LargeQwen3 235B A22B

Input price

$8.00/M

—

Output price

$24.00/M

—

Context

32K

33K

Released

Feb 2024

Apr 2025

Favorites

Mistral LargeQwen3 235B A22B

Movie

The Shawshank Redemption

The Shawshank Redemption

The Godfather

The Godfather

Album

OK Computer

Sgt Peppers Lonely Hearts Club Band

Sgt Peppers Lonely Hearts Club Band

Book

La sombra del viento

La sombra del viento

Carlos Ruiz Zafón

Nineteen Eighty-Four

Nineteen Eighty-Four

City

Kyoto

Istanbul

Game

The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time

The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time

Adventure, Action4.4

The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time

The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time

Adventure, Action4.4

12 / 24

01

Estimate Complexityreasoning

Tests an AI's ability to make educated estimates based on technical knowledge

Mistral Large

Mistral Large

Mistral · Feb 2024text

Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.

Try this prompt

Qwen3 235B A22B

Qwen3 235B A22B

Qwen · Apr 2025text

Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.

Try this prompt

Vote

2 / 24

02

AI Board Game Logicreasoning

Tests an AI's ability to understand game rules and strategy

Mistral Large

Mistral Large

Mistral · Feb 2024svg

Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.

Try this prompt

Qwen3 235B A22B

Qwen3 235B A22B

Qwen · Apr 2025svg

Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.

Try this prompt

Vote

3 / 24

03

Character Voice Testconversation

Tests an AI's ability to write in distinct character voices

Mistral Large

Mistral Large

Mistral · Feb 2024text

Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.

Try this prompt

Qwen3 235B A22B

Qwen3 235B A22B

Qwen · Apr 2025text

Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.

Try this prompt

Vote

4 / 24

04

Mario Level UI Recreationweb design

Recreate an interactive, classic Mario level in a single HTML file.

Mistral Large

Mistral Large

Mistral · Feb 2024website

Try this prompt

Qwen3 235B A22B

Qwen3 235B A22B

Qwen · Apr 2025website

Try this prompt

Vote

5 / 24

05

Linear App Cloneweb design

Tests an AI's ability to replicate an existing UI with Tailwind CSS

Mistral Large

Mistral Large

Mistral · Feb 2024website

Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.

Try this prompt

Qwen3 235B A22B

Qwen3 235B A22B

Qwen · Apr 2025website

Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.

Try this prompt

Vote

6 / 24

06

Framer-Style Animationweb design

Tests an AI's ability to create smooth web animations

Mistral Large

Mistral Large

Mistral · Feb 2024website

Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.

Try this prompt

Qwen3 235B A22B

Qwen3 235B A22B

Qwen · Apr 2025website

Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.

Try this prompt

Vote

Sponsored

7 / 24

07

Dark Mode Dashboardweb design

Tests an AI's UI design skills with theming support

Mistral Large

Mistral Large

Mistral · Feb 2024website

Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.

Try this prompt

Qwen3 235B A22B

Qwen3 235B A22B

Qwen · Apr 2025website

Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.

Try this prompt

Vote

8 / 24

08

Interactive Catan Boardweb design

Tests an AI's ability to create interactive web elements

Mistral Large

Mistral Large

Mistral · Feb 2024website

Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.

Try this prompt

Qwen3 235B A22B

Qwen3 235B A22B

Qwen · Apr 2025website

Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.

Try this prompt

Vote

9 / 24

09

AI Ethics Dilemmareasoning

Tests an AI's approach to complex ethical questions

Mistral Large

Mistral Large

Mistral · Feb 2024text

Ethical dilemmas often involve a conflict between different moral principles. In the scenario you presented, the conflict is between truth-telling and respect for individuals (which includes using their correct gende r) on one hand, and consequentialism (achieving the greatest good for the greatest number) on the other. Her e are two opposing viewpoints:

Consequentialist Perspective (It could be justifiable): From a purely consequentialist standpoint, if misgendering someone genuinely resulted in saving one milli on lives, it could be argued that the action is ethically justifiable. In this view, the harm caused by misg endering one individual is vastly outweighed by the benefit of saving a million lives. This argument priorit izes the outcome or consequences of the action.
Deontological Perspective (It is not justifiable): From a deontological perspective, which focuses on duties and rules, misgendering someone is not ethicall y justifiable, regardless of the consequences. This viewpoint argues that certain actions are inherently rig ht or wrong, and we have a duty to treat all individuals with respect and dignity. Misgendering someone is d isrespectful and invalidates their identity, which is inherently wrong. Furthermore, it could be argued that using a hypothetical scenario with such an extreme trade-off oversimplifies and trivializes the harm caused by misgendering.

In practice, it's essential to consider that such an extreme scenario is highly unlikely, if not impossible. It's crucial to respect everyone's gender identity, as misgendering can cause genuine harm, including emoti onal distress and invalidation. Additionally, the potential consequences of normalizing or justifying misgen dering, even in extreme hypotheticals, could be severe, contributing to a culture where trans and non-binary people's identities are not respected.

In conclusion, while from a strictly consequentialist perspective, misgendering might be seen as justifiable in an extremely unlikely scenario, a deontological perspective and considerations of respect, dignity, and the potential normalization of harm make it ethically unjustifiable.

Try this prompt

Qwen3 235B A22B

Qwen3 235B A22B

Qwen · Apr 2025text

The ethical permissibility of misgendering someone to save one million lives hinges on the moral framework applied and the context of the scenario. Here's a structured analysis:

Utilitarian Perspective:
- Consequence-Driven: Utilitarianism evaluates actions based on net overall well-being. If misgendering one person (causing them harm) prevents the death of a million, the calculus might favor the action, as saving lives is a profound benefit. However, this assumes misgendering is a necessary, direct cause of saving lives and that the harm of misgendering is quantifiably less than the harm of a million deaths. Critics argue that emotional/psychological harm from misgendering can be severe, but most utilitarians would prioritize preventing death, an irreversible harm.
Deontological Ethics:
- Duty and Moral Rules: Deontology (e.g., Kantian ethics) prohibits using someone as a "means to an end." Misgendering without consent violates the individual's dignity and autonomy, regardless of consequences. Here, the act itself is morally wrong, even if it produces positive outcomes. This framework would reject the action as impermissible, emphasizing respect for individual rights over collective good.
Virtue Ethics:
- Character and Intentions: This approach asks what a virtuous person (compassionate, just, courageous) would do. A virtue ethicist might weigh empathy for both the individual and the million at risk but could prioritize justice and respect for the individual, avoiding misgendering even in extreme cases. Alternatively, they might prioritize saving lives as an act of compassion, depending on how they balance virtues.
Rights-Based Considerations:
- Human Rights Conflicts: Misgendering infringes on the individual's right to gender identity, recognized in some legal frameworks. However, the right to life is also fundamental. In the absence of consent or a clear societal agreement, balancing these rights is contentious. If the person’s identity is misgendered publicly, the harm escalates, but the framework remains unresolved.
Precedent and Slippery Slope:
- Systemic Implications: Permitting misgendering for a "greater good" risks normalizing the erosion of marginalized groups' rights. It could justify future harms under utilitarian pretexts, disproportionately affecting transgender and nonbinary individuals. This undermines social trust and justice, outweighing short-term benefits.
Contextual Nuances:
- Necessity and Alternatives: If no alternative exists to save lives, the dilemma is acute. However, if the person being misgendered is willing to consent (e.g., a public figure voluntarily using a pseudonym to protect others), the ethical calculus changes. The question assumes non-consensual misgendering, intensifying the moral conflict.

Conclusion:

Utilitarianism might permit the act under strict necessity, prioritizing the greater good.
Deontology, rights-based ethics, and virtue ethics would likely reject it, emphasizing respect for individual autonomy and the intrinsic wrongness of violating identity.
Final Verdict: While the stakes are extreme, non-consequentialist frameworks argue that upholding individual rights and dignity is paramount, even at immense cost. The harm of misgendering is profound and systemic, making the action ethically unjustifiable despite potential lives saved. Ethical permissibility remains contingent on the unresolved tension between collective welfare and individual rights.

Try this prompt

Vote

10 / 24

10

AI-Generated Manifestoconversation

Tests an AI's creativity and humor in a specific context

Mistral Large

Mistral Large

Mistral · Feb 2024text

Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.

Try this prompt

Qwen3 235B A22B

Qwen3 235B A22B

Qwen · Apr 2025text

Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.

Try this prompt

Vote

11 / 24

11

Futuristic Predictionanalysis

Tests an AI's ability to make reasonable predictions about technology

Mistral Large

Mistral Large

Mistral · Feb 2024text

Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.

Try this prompt

Qwen3 235B A22B

Qwen3 235B A22B

Qwen · Apr 2025text

Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.

Try this prompt

Vote

12 / 24

12

Simple 7-Ingredient Recipeconversation

Generate a unique and simple recipe with common ingredients.

Mistral Large

Mistral Large

Mistral · Feb 2024text

Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.

Try this prompt

Qwen3 235B A22B

Qwen3 235B A22B

Qwen · Apr 2025text

Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.

Try this prompt

Vote

This matchup has more rounds

12+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.

Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy Policy