Mistral Medium 3 vs Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
Compare Mistral Medium 3 by Mistral AI against Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 by Qwen, context windows of 131K vs 262K, tested across 55 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.
Which is better, Mistral Medium 3 or Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507?
Mistral Medium 3 and Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 are both competitive models. Mistral Medium 3 costs $0.4/M input tokens vs $0.071/M for Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507. Context windows: 131K vs 262K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between Mistral Medium 3 and Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
Mistral Medium 3 is made by mistral while Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is from qwen. Mistral Medium 3 has a 131K token context window compared to Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507's 262K. On pricing, Mistral Medium 3 costs $0.4/M input tokens vs $0.071/M for Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507.
No community votes yet. On paper, Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 has the edge — newer, bigger context window.
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is 7.0x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Style Comparison
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 uses 11.4x more emoji
vsAsk them anything yourself
Some models write identically. You are paying for the brand.
178 models fingerprinted across 32 writing dimensions. Free research.
185x
price gap between models that write identically
178
models
12
clone pairs
32
dimensions
279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.
We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.
