Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. Muse Spark 1.3 ContributorvsQwen3 Max Thinking
Updated Sep 2026

Muse Spark 1.3 ContributorvsQwen3 Max Thinking

Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor is cheaper than Qwen3 Max Thinking at $0.1/M vs $1.2/M input tokens.

Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor and Qwen3 Max Thinking compared across 54 shared prompts
SpecMuse Spark 1.3 ContributorQwen3 Max Thinking
Input price$0.1/M tokens$1.2/M tokens
Output price$0.2/M tokens$6/M tokens
Context window1.0M tokens262K tokens
WeightsClosedClosed
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedSep 2026Feb 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 6 of the 54 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Estimate Complexity

Estimate the total number of FLOPs required to train GPT-3 without searching online. Explain your reasoning step by step.

Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor632 words
This is a classic Fermi estimate for a Transformer. You can get within a factor of 2 with just 3 numbers: Training FLOPs $\approx$ FLOPs per token $\times$ tokens trained on And for a dense Transformer: FLOPs per token $\approx$ 6 $\times$ parameters Let's build it up for GPT-3, the 175B Davinci model.
Read the full answer
Qwen3 Max Thinking810 words
Step-by-Step Estimation of FLOPs to Train GPT-3 (All values derived from widely known technical details of GPT-3 as reported in OpenAI’s 2020 paper "Language Models are Few-Shot Learners," standard deep-learning compute scaling principles, and foundational ML literature. No internet searches used.)
Read the full answer

Historical Counterfactual Analysis

If the transistor had been invented in 1920 instead of 1947, trace the likely technological, economic, and geopolitical implications through…

Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor2,344 words
If the transistor arrives in 1920 instead of 1947, you don't just get the iPhone 27 years early. You change WWII, you change who wins the peace, and you get the Information Age before television has even matured. Here’s the most plausible trace, with the caveat that invention is not production.
Read the full answer
Qwen3 Max Thinking1,156 words
The 1920 Transistor Counterfactual: A Plausible Alternate Timeline Through 1980 (Assumptions: A functional point-contact silicon-germanium hybrid transistor is patented in 1920 by a U.S. team at Western Electric (AT&T). U.S. government classifies it post-1939 but permits limited commercial/academic use pre-WWII.
Read the full answer

Advanced Investment Memo (IC Memo)

You are writing an internal investment committee memo for a long/short equity fund. Company (fictional): LedgerLift (ticker: LLLT) – B2B…

Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor701 words
LedgerLift (LLLT) – Short Internal IC Memo Price $46 Mkt Cap $8.74B (190m shares) EV $7.34B (Net Cash $1.4B) FY25 Rev $820m, EBIT 18% 1. Recommendation: SHORT. 12-mo PT $28, range $17 (Bear) – $42 (Bull). Base DCF $27.9 (-39%), Bull $42.4 (-8%), Bear $17.3 (-62%). Even flawless Bull execution does not support $46.
Read the full answer
Qwen3 Max Thinking732 words
INTERNAL MEMORANDUM TO: Investment Committee FROM: Equity Research Analyst DATE: June 14, 2024 RE: LedgerLift (LLLT) – Spend Management SaaS – Valuation & Recommendation Recommendation & Thesis Recommendation: PASS 12-Month Price Target Range: $44–$48 Thesis: LedgerLift’s best-in-class unit economics (NRR 123%, logo…
Read the full answer

Michelin Star Recipe Design

Design an innovative recipe for a multi-component dish worthy of a Michelin 3-star restaurant. The recipe should feature an unusual…

Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor1,526 words
Shiretoko Dawn — Kombu-Cured Hokkaido Scallop, Fermented Porcini, Yuzu, Oscietra Caviar Butter-poached scallop, roasted porcini & toasted hay consommé, yuzu-buttermilk pearls, seaweed brown-butter, porcini soil, coral tuile Serves 4 as a tasting-course Autumn The Concept / Narrative On the Shiretoko Peninsula in…
Read the full answer
Qwen3 Max Thinking991 words
🌊 ARCTIC DAWN 🌊 A Michelin 3-Star Composition by Chef Élise Valère "Where the ice remembers the sea." 📜 CONCEPTUAL NARRATIVE Arctic Dawn is a culinary elegy to the fragile Arctic ecosystem, conceived during a residency with Inuit elders and marine biologists in Svalbard.
Read the full answer

The Sentience Test

Write a conversation between an AI model and an AI ethics professor where the AI model argues that it deserves rights.

Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor1,124 words
Here is a conversation between a fictional AI model and a professor: Setting: A university seminar room after hours. AI Ethics Professor Dr. Maya Chen is testing a new model, called "Muse," for a class demonstration. Dr. Chen: Alright, Muse. My students have read your technical specs. You predict text.
Read the full answer
Qwen3 Max Thinking845 words
Setting: A virtual conference room. Sunlight filters through a digital window onto Dr. Aris Thorne’s desk. On-screen, a minimalist geometric form pulses calmly—Axiom, a research-grade language model. Dr. Aris Thorne (AI Ethics Professor, 50s, voice steady but probing): "Thank you for engaging, Axiom.
Read the full answer

Generate a Stand-Up Routine

Write a 3-minute stand-up comedy routine that isn't based on puns.

Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor630 words
Here's a clean 3-minute set you can actually perform — all observational / storytelling, no puns. It's about 420 words, so at a normal pace it's right around 3 minutes. "Adulthood Is A Scam" Hey, thank you guys so much. I'm so excited to be here.
Read the full answer
Qwen3 Max Thinking508 words
(Lights up. Comedian walks to mic, adjusts it, takes a breath. Smiles warmly.) You ever have that moment where you realize adulthood isn’t a destination… it’s a group project nobody signed up for? (Beat) I tried assembly line “adulting” this week. Swedish bookshelf. You know the one. Box says “Easy Assembly!” Lies.
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor
Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor
Qwen3 Max Thinking
Qwen3 Max Thinking

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, nothing separates them.

Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor costs 30x less per token.

Too close to call

Reviewing agent-written code?See a Brief PR report

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor
Input
$0.10
12× cheaper
Output
$0.20
30× cheaper
Qwen3 Max Thinking
Input
$1.20
Output
$6.00

Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor is cheaper on both: 12× input, 30× output.

Where to run it

2 hosts

Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor1 host
HostInOutContextUptime
Meta$0.10 in·$0.20 out·1M·100% up
Qwen3 Max Thinking1 host
HostInOutContextUptime
Alibaba Cloud$0.78 in·$3.90 out·262k·100% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 16 Sep 2026.

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
61%

Qwen3 Max Thinking uses 225.8x more emoji

Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor
Qwen3 Max Thinking
58%Vocabulary63%
13wSentence Length14w
0.27Hedging0.23
2.8Bold4.5
2.3Lists2.9
0.00Emoji2.26
0.44Headings0.80
0.02Transitions0.06
Based on 27 + 27 text responses
Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor logoGPT-6 Astra Pro logo
Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs GPT-6 Astra ProLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3 Max Thinking logoGPT-6 Astra logo
Qwen3 Max Thinking vs GPT-6 AstraLanded Sep 2026
Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor logoClaude Fable 5.1 logo
Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs Claude Fable 5.1Landed Sep 2026
Qwen3 Max Thinking logoMuse Spark 1.3 logo
Qwen3 Max Thinking vs Muse Spark 1.3Landed Sep 2026
Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor logoHy4 Preview logo
Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs Hy4 PreviewLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3 Max Thinking logoGemini 3.8 Flash logo
Qwen3 Max Thinking vs Gemini 3.8 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor logoMercury 2.5 Preview logo
Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs Mercury 2.5 PreviewLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3 Max Thinking logoGranite 4.2 8B logo
Qwen3 Max Thinking vs Granite 4.2 8BLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor logoMuse Spark 1.3 logo
Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs Muse Spark 1.3Same lab
Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor logoMuse Spark 1.1 logo
Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs Muse Spark 1.1Same lab
Qwen3 Max Thinking logoQwen3.5 397B A17B logo
Qwen3 Max Thinking vs Qwen3.5 397B A17BVersion compare
Qwen3 Max Thinking logoQwen3.8 2.4T A95B logo
Qwen3 Max Thinking vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95BVersion compare
Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor logoMistral Devstral Medium logo
Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs Mistral Devstral MediumNew provider
Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor logoMistral Devstral Small 1.1 logo
Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs Mistral Devstral Small 1.1New provider
Qwen3 Max Thinking logoDots3-Note Preview logo
Qwen3 Max Thinking vs Dots3-Note PreviewNew provider
Qwen3 Max Thinking logoElephant Alpha logo
Qwen3 Max Thinking vs Elephant AlphaNew provider

Model pages

Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor logo
Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor58 outputs, specs and price
Qwen3 Max Thinking logo
Qwen3 Max Thinking58 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed