Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super (free)vsSolar Pro 4
Updated Aug 2026

NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super (free)vsSolar Pro 4

Solar Pro 4 has a larger context window than NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super (free) (524K tokens vs 262K tokens).

NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super (free) and Solar Pro 4 compared across 14 shared prompts
SpecNVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super (free)Solar Pro 4
Input price—$0.09/M tokens
Output price—$0.36/M tokens
Context window262K tokens524K tokens
WeightsOpen—
Free API (OpenRouter)Yes (1 provider)No
ReleasedMar 2026Aug 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 6 of the 14 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Historical Counterfactual Analysis

If the transistor had been invented in 1920 instead of 1947, trace the likely technological, economic, and geopolitical implications through…

NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super (free)2,075 words
The 1920 Transistor: A Cascade of Contingency Through 1980 Moving the transistor's invention from Bell Labs (1947) to 1920 – assuming it still emerges from similar industrial research (e.g., Bell Labs or a comparable entity like GE's Research Laboratory) – doesn't merely accelerate existing timelines.
Read the full answer
Solar Pro 41,638 words
The Premise: The 1920 Solid-State Breakthrough For this scenario to function, we must assume a functional point-contact or junction transistor is demonstrated in 1920 (perhaps by Lilienfeld or an early Bell Labs precursor), and crucially, that methods for purifying semiconductor materials (germanium/silicon) are solved…
Read the full answer

Simple 7-Ingredient Recipe

Create a simple recipe for a delicious dish (sweet or savory) using only 7 common pantry ingredients. Include a creative name for the dish…

NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super (free)288 words
Dish Name: Lemon‑Garlic Spinach Pasta Pantry Ingredients (7) Spaghetti (or any long pasta) – 8 oz Olive oil – 2 Tbsp 3. Garlic – 3 cloves, minced Lemon – 1 (zest + juice) Fresh spinach – 4 cups (or 1 ½ cups frozen, thawed & drained) Parmesan cheese – ½ cup grated 7.
Read the full answer
Solar Pro 4294 words
🍝 Golden Umami Silk Noodles A savory-sweet pasta dish that transforms basic pantry staples into a glossy, flavorful meal. It's quick, comforting, and relies on the balance of soy, honey, and butter for a rich sauce without needing fresh produce.
Read the full answer

Adversarial Contract Review

Here is a contract for a software consulting engagement: --- SOFTWARE CONSULTING AGREEMENT This Agreement is entered into between TechCorp…

NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super (free)2,671 words
Below is a clause‑by‑clause review of the agreement you posted. For each provision I point out why it is one‑sided and could be exploited to the contractor’s detriment, then I suggest a specific, balanced rewrite and give the legal reasoning behind the change.
Read the full answer
Solar Pro 41,382 words
Disclaimer: I am an AI assistant and not an attorney. The following analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Contract laws vary significantly by jurisdiction (e.g., state, country).
Read the full answer

Explain Like I'm a Specific Expert

Explain how a large language model (like GPT or Claude) learns and generates text to each of these three audiences: 1. **An experienced…

NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super (free)944 words
1. Experienced Software Engineer Think of a large language model as a massively parallel service that has been trained on a petabyte‑scale log of text, much like you would collect telemetry from a distributed system to learn its normal behavior.
Read the full answer
Solar Pro 41,062 words
The Experienced Software Engineer Think of the model not as a reasoning engine, but as a highly compressed, non-deterministic function approximator that maps a sequence of input tokens to a probability distribution over the next token.
Read the full answer

Startup Pitch Teardown

Here's a pitch deck summary for a startup called "MindMeld AI": **Slide 1 - Vision:** "We're building the future of human-AI collaboration.…

NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super (free)981 words
After analyzing MindMeld AI's pitch deck, I've identified the three weakest claims based on scientific plausibility, market logic, and traction substantiation. Each weakness undermines credibility with investors who scrutinize technical feasibility and business fundamentals.
Read the full answer
Solar Pro 41,009 words
Here are the three weakest claims in the MindMeld AI pitch deck, along with an analysis of why they undermine credibility and specific recommendations for improvement. The Technical Performance Claim Claim: "Our proprietary EEG headband uses advanced ML to decode neural patterns into text with 94% accuracy...
Read the full answer

Advanced Investment Memo (IC Memo)

You are writing an internal investment committee memo for a long/short equity fund. Company (fictional): LedgerLift (ticker: LLLT) – B2B…

NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super (free)1,089 words
Internal Investment Committee Memo – LedgerLift (LLLT) Date: 3 Nov 2025 Recommendation & Price Target Recommendation: Short 12‑month PT range: $20 – $30 (reflecting bear‑to‑base case outcomes) Two‑sentence thesis: LedgerLift’s current share price of $46 implies a valuation that exceeds even the bull‑case DCF ($42/sh)…
Read the full answer
Solar Pro 41,052 words
INTERNAL MEMO – INVESTMENT COMMITTEE TO: IC Members FROM: Long/Short Equity Desk DATE: Oct 2024 SUBJECT: LedgerLift (LLLT) – Initiation / Long Recommendation & Thesis Recommendation: LONG 12-Month PT Range: $52–$58 (Base case ~$54, Bull ~$68, Bear ~$38) Thesis: LedgerLift is a structurally advantaged mid-market AP…
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
Solar Pro 4
Solar Pro 4
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super (free)
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super (free)Runner-up

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Solar Pro 4 has the edge: newer, bigger context window.

Too close to call
API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super (free)
Input
—
Output
—
Solar Pro 4
Input
$0.09
Output
$0.36
Where to run it

2 hosts

NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super (free)1 host
HostInOutContextUptime
NVIDIA$0 in·$0 out·262k·96.3% up
Solar Pro 41 host
HostInOutContextUptime
UUpstage$0.09 in·$0.36 out·524k·99.8% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 22 Sep 2026.

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super (free) is developed by NVIDIA while Solar Pro 4 is developed by Upstage. NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super (free) has a 262K token context window vs Solar Pro 4's 524K. You can compare their actual outputs across 14 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super (free) and Solar Pro 4 each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 14 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super (free) and Solar Pro 4 across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super (free) logoDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp logo
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super (free) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpLanded Sep 2026
Solar Pro 4 logoHy3 logo
Solar Pro 4 vs Hy3Landed Sep 2026
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super (free) logoQwen3.7 Flash logo
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super (free) vs Qwen3.7 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Solar Pro 4 logoLing 3.0 Flash logo
Solar Pro 4 vs Ling 3.0 FlashLanded Sep 2026
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super (free) logoMuse Glimmer 30B logo
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super (free) vs Muse Glimmer 30BLanded Sep 2026
Solar Pro 4 logoGLM 5.3 logo
Solar Pro 4 vs GLM 5.3Landed Sep 2026
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super (free) logoTernary Bonsai 2 27B logo
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super (free) vs Ternary Bonsai 2 27BLanded Sep 2026
Solar Pro 4 logoGLM 5.3 Flash logo
Solar Pro 4 vs GLM 5.3 FlashLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super (free) logoNemotron 3.5 Lightning logo
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super (free) vs Nemotron 3.5 LightningVersion compare
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super (free) logoNemotron 3 Nano Omni (free) logo
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super (free) vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni (free)Same lab
Solar Pro 4 logoSolar Pro 3 logo
Solar Pro 4 vs Solar Pro 3Same lab
Solar Pro 4 logoOx Alpha logo
Solar Pro 4 vs Ox AlphaSame size
Solar Pro 4 logoGPT-5.1 logo
Solar Pro 4 vs GPT-5.1New provider
Solar Pro 4 logoGPT-5.1 Chat logo
Solar Pro 4 vs GPT-5.1 ChatSame size
Solar Pro 4 logoGPT-5.1-Codex logo
Solar Pro 4 vs GPT-5.1-CodexNew provider
Solar Pro 4 logoGPT-5.1 Codex Max logo
Solar Pro 4 vs GPT-5.1 Codex MaxNew provider

Model pages

NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super (free) logo
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super (free)53 outputs, specs and price
Solar Pro 4 logo
Solar Pro 414 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed