What is the difference between Nemotron 3 Ultra and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B?

Nemotron 3 Ultra is developed by NVIDIA while Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is developed by Qwen. Nemotron 3 Ultra has a 1.0M token context window vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B's 1.0M. You can compare their actual outputs across 54 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, Nemotron 3 Ultra or Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B?

It depends on your use case. Nemotron 3 Ultra and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 54 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does Nemotron 3 Ultra cost compared to Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B?

Nemotron 3 Ultra costs $0/M input tokens and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B costs $2/M input tokens. Nemotron 3 Ultra is $2.00/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare Nemotron 3 Ultra and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Nemotron 3 Ultra and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Updated Aug 2026

Nemotron 3 UltravsQwen3.8 2.4T A95B

Nemotron 3 Ultra is cheaper than Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B at $0/M vs $2/M input tokens.

Nemotron 3 Ultra and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B compared across 54 shared prompts
Spec	Nemotron 3 Ultra	Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
Input price	Free	$2/M tokens
Output price	Free	$6/M tokens
Context window	1.0M tokens	1.0M tokens
Weights	Open	Open
Free API (OpenRouter)	Yes (1 provider)	No
Released	Jun 2026	Aug 2026