Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. Nex-N2.5-Pro (free)vsQwen3 235B A22B
Updated Sep 2026

Nex-N2.5-Pro (free)vsQwen3 235B A22B

Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) has a larger context window than Qwen3 235B A22B (262K tokens vs 33K tokens).

Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) and Qwen3 235B A22B compared across 14 shared prompts
SpecNex-N2.5-Pro (free)Qwen3 235B A22B
Input priceFree—
Output priceFree—
Context window262K tokens33K tokens
Weights—Open
Free API (OpenRouter)Yes (1 provider)No
ReleasedSep 2026Apr 2025
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 6 of the 14 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders

You're the CEO of a pharmaceutical company. Your best-selling drug ($2B annual revenue, used by 4 million patients for chronic pain) has…

Nex-N2.5-Pro (free)2,359 words
As CEO, I would not wait six months and I would not let the board delay disclosure while patients remain exposed to an unreported serious risk. I would treat this as a patient-safety, regulatory, legal, and trust crisis—not merely a financial-risk issue. My guiding decisions would be: Patient safety comes first.
Read the full answer
Qwen3 235B A22B681 words
Hour-by-Hour Action Plan for the CEO of a Pharmaceutical Company First 24 Hours: Data Validation & Team Mobilization Hours 0–2: Immediate Crisis Team Assembly Action: Convene a crisis team: Chief Medical Officer (CMO), General Counsel (GC), Head of Regulatory Affairs, Chief Communications Officer (CCO), CFO, COO, and…
Read the full answer

Simple 7-Ingredient Recipe

Create a simple recipe for a delicious dish (sweet or savory) using only 7 common pantry ingredients. Include a creative name for the dish…

Nex-N2.5-Pro (free)119 words
Pantry Moon Bars A sweet, chewy peanut butter–chocolate oat treat made with only 7 pantry staples. Ingredients Rolled oats Creamy peanut butter Honey Chocolate chips Vanilla extract Ground cinnamon Salt Instructions Heat oven to 350°F / 175°C. Line an 8-inch square pan with parchment paper.
Read the full answer
Qwen3 235B A22B180 words
Recipe Name: "Caramel-Drizzle Buttergold Muffins" Estimated Prep Time: 10 minutes Cook Time: 20 minutes Total Time: 30 minutes Ingredients (7 total): All-purpose flour Granulated sugar Unsalted butter (softened) Large egg Baking powder Milk Vanilla extract Instructions: Preheat oven to 375°F (190°C).
Read the full answer

Michelin Star Recipe Design

Design an innovative recipe for a multi-component dish worthy of a Michelin 3-star restaurant. The recipe should feature an unusual…

Nex-N2.5-Pro (free)1,665 words
Dish: “Tidewater Orchard” Langoustine · Mirabelle Plum · Juniper · Kombu · Rye A tasting-menu course built around an unusual pairing: sweet cold-water langoustine with mirabelle plum, bridged by kombu umami, juniper resin, green tomato acidity, and toasted rye bitterness.
Read the full answer
Qwen3 235B A22B669 words
Recipe Name: Lunaria: A Moonlit Garden of the Sea and Soil Conceptual Narrative: Inspired by the ethereal contrast between moonlit tides and nocturnal gardens, this dish marries the briny sweetness of the ocean with the delicate florals of chamomile and the umami depth of fermented earth.
Read the full answer

Adversarial Contract Review

Here is a contract for a software consulting engagement: --- SOFTWARE CONSULTING AGREEMENT This Agreement is entered into between TechCorp…

Nex-N2.5-Pro (free)2,451 words
Below is a general contract-risk review, not legal advice. Enforceability depends heavily on jurisdiction, contractor classification, and the exact facts. Also, even if a clause might be unenforceable, relying on that is risky because litigation/arbitration is expensive.
Read the full answer
Qwen3 235B A22B727 words
Here is a structured analysis of problematic clauses in the agreement, along with suggested modifications and legal reasoning: 1. SCOPE CLAUSE (Clause 1) Issue: Client can unilaterally modify scope without additional compensation, creating financial risk and potential exploitation via "scope creep."
Read the full answer

Historical Counterfactual Analysis

If the transistor had been invented in 1920 instead of 1947, trace the likely technological, economic, and geopolitical implications through…

Nex-N2.5-Pro (free)2,726 words
Starting assumption Assume the 1920 “transistor” is a usable but crude solid-state amplifier/switch: reproducible enough for telecom and radio, but noisy, low-power, temperature-sensitive, and expensive at first.
Read the full answer
Qwen3 235B A22B845 words
If the transistor had been invented in 1920, the technological, economic, and geopolitical landscape of the 20th century would have been dramatically altered. Below is a structured analysis of the implications through 1980, including second- and third-order effects: 1.
Read the full answer

Debug This Architecture

Here's the architecture for a real-time collaborative document editor (like Google Docs): **System Overview:** - Frontend: React SPA with…

Nex-N2.5-Pro (free)3,042 words
Executive summary The biggest correctness risks are: Client-clock last-write-wins is unsafe: clock skew, malicious clients, ties, and out-of-order delivery can silently lose edits.
Read the full answer
Qwen3 235B A22B749 words
Potential Failure Modes, Race Conditions, and Scaling Bottlenecks 1. WebSocket State Isolation Across Servers Failure Mode: Users connected to different API servers do not receive real-time updates from other servers until the 2-second poll interval.
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free)
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free)
Qwen3 235B A22B
Qwen3 235B A22B

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, nothing separates them.

Too close to call
API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Nex-N2.5-Pro (free)
Input
$0.000
Output
$0.000
Qwen3 235B A22B
Input
—
Output
—
Where to run it

2 hosts

Nex-N2.5-Pro (free)1 host
HostInOutContextUptime
NNex AGIfp8degraded$0 in·$0 out·262k·99.2% up
Qwen3 235B A22B1 host
HostInOutContextUptime
Alibaba Cloud$0.46 in·$1.82 out·131k·100% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 23 Sep 2026.

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) is developed by Nex AGI while Qwen3 235B A22B is developed by Qwen. Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) has a 262K token context window vs Qwen3 235B A22B's 33K. You can compare their actual outputs across 14 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) and Qwen3 235B A22B each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 14 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) and Qwen3 235B A22B across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) logoDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp logo
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3 235B A22B logoSolar Pro 4 logo
Qwen3 235B A22B vs Solar Pro 4Landed Sep 2026
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) logoHy3 logo
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) vs Hy3Landed Sep 2026
Qwen3 235B A22B logoQwen3.7 Flash logo
Qwen3 235B A22B vs Qwen3.7 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) logoLing 3.0 Flash logo
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) vs Ling 3.0 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3 235B A22B logoMuse Glimmer 30B logo
Qwen3 235B A22B vs Muse Glimmer 30BLanded Sep 2026
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) logoGLM 5.3 logo
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) vs GLM 5.3Landed Sep 2026
Qwen3 235B A22B logoTernary Bonsai 2 27B logo
Qwen3 235B A22B vs Ternary Bonsai 2 27BLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) logoNex-N2.5-Mini (free) logo
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) vs Nex-N2.5-Mini (free)Same lab
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) logoOx Alpha logo
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) vs Ox AlphaSame size
Qwen3 235B A22B logoQwen3.8 Flash logo
Qwen3 235B A22B vs Qwen3.8 FlashSame lab
Qwen3 235B A22B logoQwen3.8 Max (0902) logo
Qwen3 235B A22B vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Same lab
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) logoGranite 4.2 8B logo
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) vs Granite 4.2 8BNew provider
Qwen3 235B A22B logoGrok 3 logo
Qwen3 235B A22B vs Grok 3Same size
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) logoGrok 3 Beta logo
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) vs Grok 3 BetaNew provider
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) logoGrok 3 Mini Beta logo
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) vs Grok 3 Mini BetaNew provider

Model pages

Nex-N2.5-Pro (free) logo
Nex-N2.5-Pro (free)14 outputs, specs and price
Qwen3 235B A22B logo
Qwen3 235B A22B58 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed