o1 vs QwQ 32B

Compare o1 by OpenAI against QwQ 32B by Qwen, context windows of 128K vs 40K, tested across 15 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.

Which is better, o1 or QwQ 32B?

o1 and QwQ 32B are both competitive models. o1 costs $15/M input tokens vs $0.5/M for QwQ 32B. Context windows: 128K vs 40K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.

Key Differences Between o1 and QwQ 32B

o1 is made by openai while QwQ 32B is from qwen. o1 has a 128K token context window compared to QwQ 32B's 40K. On pricing, o1 costs $15/M input tokens vs $0.5/M for QwQ 32B.

Our Verdict
o1
o1
QwQ 32B
QwQ 32B

No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.

QwQ 32B is 40x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.

Too close to call
Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
99%

o1 uses 43.7x more headings

o1
QwQ 32B
64%Vocabulary64%
16wSentence Length12w
0.76Hedging0.36
5.0Bold13.6
2.6Lists8.4
0.00Emoji0.00
0.44Headings0.00
0.40Transitions0.39
Based on 13 + 4 text responses
vs

Ask them anything yourself

o1QwQ 32B

279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.

We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.

AI Hallucination Index 2026
Free preview13 of 58 slides
FAQ

Common questions