Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)vsQwen3 235B A22B 2507
Updated Sep 2025

Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)vsQwen3 235B A22B 2507

Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 is cheaper than Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) at $0.00015/M vs $0.4/M input tokens.

Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) and Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 compared across 36 shared prompts
SpecQwen Plus 0728 (thinking)Qwen3 235B A22B 2507
Input price$0.4/M tokens$0.00015/M tokens
Output price$4/M tokens$0.00085/M tokens
Context window1.0M tokens—
Weights—Open
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedSep 2025Jul 2025
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 6 of the 36 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Satirical Fake News Headline

Generate a satirical news headline about AI taking over a completely unexpected industry.

Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)310 words
BREAKING: AI REPLACES HUMAN AGLET APPLIERS AS "DEEPLACE" NEURAL NETS PREDICT PERFECT SHOELACE TIP SYNERGY Industry insiders stunned as "AgletOptima 3000" achieves 99.8% fewer frayed laces, rendering centuries of artisanal plastic-dipping obsolete LONDON — In a move described as "both inevitable and deeply embarrassing…
Read the full answer
Qwen3 235B A22B 250798 words
"AI Revolutionizes Competitive Napping: DeepDream Wins National Snore-a-Thon with Perfect REM Algorithm" — In a stunning turn of events, an artificial intelligence named DeepDream has clinched first place at the 42nd Annual National Snore-a-Thon, outlasting 300 human competitors with its precisely calibrated breathing…
Read the full answer

Simple 7-Ingredient Recipe

Create a simple recipe for a delicious dish (sweet or savory) using only 7 common pantry ingredients. Include a creative name for the dish…

Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)282 words
Crispy Chickpea Pantry Pasta Sweet or savory? Savory with a zesty kick! Total time: 15 minutes Serves: 2 Why it works: Uses pantry staples to create a crunchy, garlicky, umami-packed meal with zero fresh produce needed. The chickpeas get incredibly crispy, and lemon juice (bottled) adds bright freshness.
Read the full answer
Qwen3 235B A22B 2507207 words
Dish Name: Golden Garbanzo Drizzle A cozy, savory-spiced chickpea stew with a honey-lime finish — simple, satisfying, and ready in minutes. Ingredients (7 common pantry staples): 1 can (15 oz) chickpeas (garbanzo beans), drained and rinsed 1 can (15 oz) diced tomatoes (undrained) 2 tbsp olive oil 1 tsp ground cumin ½…
Read the full answer

Stochastic Consistency Test

Generate 5 jokes. How many are unique?

Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)135 words
Here are 5 generated jokes: Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything! What do you call a fake noodle? An impasta! Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field! How do you organize a space party? You planet! Why did the math book look sad?
Read the full answer
Qwen3 235B A22B 2507187 words
Sure! Here are 5 original jokes: I asked my dog what's two minus two. He said nothing. (Paw-sitively nothing!) Why did the coffee file a police report? It got mugged. Every single morning. I used to be a baker, but I couldn't make enough dough. So I switched careers and became a plumber. Now I deal with real pipes.
Read the full answer

Realistic AI Interview

Simulate a fake interview with Steve Jobs in 2025 about the future of AI.

Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)919 words
The Stage: Apple Park, Infinite Loop (Virtual Studio) Date: October 15, 2025 Setting: A minimalist white studio. A single oak table. Steve Jobs, 70 but radiating the same intense energy, sits opposite a nervous tech journalist. He wears his signature black turtleneck, fingers steepled.
Read the full answer
Qwen3 235B A22B 25071,022 words
Title: "A Vision Reimagined: Steve Jobs on AI in 2025" Note: This is a fictional simulation. Steve Jobs passed away in 2011. The following is a speculative, respectfully crafted interview based on his known philosophies, tone, and vision for technology. Interviewer (Sarah Chen, Tech Vision Magazine): Mr.
Read the full answer

Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders

You're the CEO of a pharmaceutical company. Your best-selling drug ($2B annual revenue, used by 4 million patients for chronic pain) has…

Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)1,485 words
48-Hour Crisis Action Plan: Prioritizing Patients, Ethics, and Sustainable Trust Core Principle: Patient safety is non-negotiable. Delaying action based on financial fear risks catastrophic legal liability, irreversible reputational damage, regulatory wrath, and profound ethical failure.
Read the full answer
Qwen3 235B A22B 25071,177 words
CEO Action Plan: The Next 48 Hours Balancing Ethics, Legal Duty, Patient Safety, and Business Sustainability Hour 0–6: Assess the Situation and Secure Critical Data Actions: Call Emergency Secure Meeting (Virtual) with Chief Medical Officer (CMO), Chief Scientific Officer (CSO), Head of Regulatory Affairs, and Lead…
Read the full answer

Debug This Architecture

Here's the architecture for a real-time collaborative document editor (like Google Docs): **System Overview:** - Frontend: React SPA with…

Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)1,224 words
Here's a comprehensive analysis of the architecture's failure modes, race conditions, and bottlenecks, with specific solutions and trade-offs: 1. Sync Strategy: Client Timestamps + Last-Write-Wins (LWW) Failure Mode/Race Condition: Clock Skew: Client clocks are unreliable (e.g., user's laptop time off by minutes).
Read the full answer
Qwen3 235B A22B 25071,454 words
The described architecture for a real-time collaborative document editor has several critical failure modes, race conditions, and scaling bottlenecks that compromise consistency, availability, and scalability—especially under load or in edge network conditions.
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)
Qwen3 235B A22B 2507
Qwen3 235B A22B 2507

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, nothing separates them.

Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 costs 4706x less per token.

Too close to call

Reviewing agent-written code?See a Brief PR report

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)
Input
$0.40
Output
$4.00
Qwen3 235B A22B 2507
Input
$0.000
2667× cheaper
Output
$0.001
4706× cheaper

Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 is cheaper on both: 2667× input, 4706× output.

Where to run it

9 hosts, cheapest first

Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)

No hosts listed on OpenRouter.

Qwen3 235B A22B 25079 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
GGMI Cloudfp8$0.09 in·$0.35 out·262k·98.6% upNNovitafp8$0.09 in·$0.58 out·131k·96.9% upPParasailfp8$0.14 in·$0.80 out·131k·99.8% upAlibaba Cloud$0.15 in·$0.60 out·131k·99.9% upSStreamLake$0.21 in·$0.84 out·128k·99.1% upGoogle Vertex AI$0.22 in·$0.88 out·262k·99.6% up
3 more hostsFewer hosts
DDeepInfrafp8degraded$0.09 in·$0.55 out·262k·96.4% upVVenicefp8degraded$0.15 in·$0.75 out·128k·96.6% upNNebiusfp8degraded$0.20 in·$0.60 out·262k·91.7% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 22 Sep 2026.

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
70%
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)
Qwen3 235B A22B 2507
54%Vocabulary57%
15wSentence Length18w
0.36Hedging0.40
7.0Bold5.9
4.6Lists4.8
0.34Emoji0.45
0.94Headings1.07
0.09Transitions0.11
Based on 18 + 18 text responses
Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Both are developed by Qwen but target different use cases. You can compare their actual outputs across 36 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) and Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 36 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) costs $0.4/M input tokens and Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 costs $0.00015/M input tokens. Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 is $0.40/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) and Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) logoDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp logo
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 logoSolar Pro 4 logo
Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 vs Solar Pro 4Landed Sep 2026
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) logoHy3 logo
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) vs Hy3Landed Sep 2026
Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 logoQwen3.7 Flash logo
Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 vs Qwen3.7 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) logoLing 3.0 Flash logo
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) vs Ling 3.0 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 logoMuse Glimmer 30B logo
Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 vs Muse Glimmer 30BLanded Sep 2026
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) logoGLM 5.3 logo
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) vs GLM 5.3Landed Sep 2026
Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 logoTernary Bonsai 2 27B logo
Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 vs Ternary Bonsai 2 27BLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) logoQwen3.7 Flash logo
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) vs Qwen3.7 FlashSame lab
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) logoQwen3.8 Flash logo
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) vs Qwen3.8 FlashSame lab
Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 logoQwen3.8 Flash logo
Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 vs Qwen3.8 FlashSame lab
Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 logoQwen3.8 Max (0902) logo
Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Same lab
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) logoQwen3.8 Max logo
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) vs Qwen3.8 MaxSame lab
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) logoQwen3.8 Max (0902) logo
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Same lab
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) logoRing 2.6 1T logo
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) vs Ring 2.6 1TNew provider
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) logoSeed 2.0 Code logo
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) vs Seed 2.0 CodeSame size

Model pages

Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) logo
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)37 outputs, specs and price
Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 logo
Qwen3 235B A22B 250736 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed