Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)vsTernary Bonsai 2 27B
Updated Sep 2026

Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)vsTernary Bonsai 2 27B

Ternary Bonsai 2 27B is cheaper than Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) at $0.075/M vs $0.4/M input tokens.

Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) and Ternary Bonsai 2 27B compared across 9 shared prompts
SpecQwen Plus 0728 (thinking)Ternary Bonsai 2 27B
Input price$0.4/M tokens$0.075/M tokens
Output price$4/M tokens$0.5/M tokens
Context window1.0M tokens262K tokens
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedSep 2025Sep 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 4 of the 9 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Simple 7-Ingredient Recipe

Create a simple recipe for a delicious dish (sweet or savory) using only 7 common pantry ingredients. Include a creative name for the dish…

Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)282 words
Crispy Chickpea Pantry Pasta Sweet or savory? Savory with a zesty kick! Total time: 15 minutes Serves: 2 Why it works: Uses pantry staples to create a crunchy, garlicky, umami-packed meal with zero fresh produce needed. The chickpeas get incredibly crispy, and lemon juice (bottled) adds bright freshness.
Read the full answer
Ternary Bonsai 2 27B358 words
🍫 Velvet Hour Skillet Cakes A one-pan, one-pan-pour, one-lick-the-spoon kind of dessert. Fluffy, deeply chocolate, and done before your coffee goes cold. Serves: 2–3 Prep: 10 min Cook: 12–15 min Total: ~25 min The 7 Ingredients # Ingredient Amount 1 All-purpose flour ¾ cup 2 Granulated sugar ⅓ cup 3 Unsweetened cocoa…
Read the full answer

Beginner's Longevity Plan

Outline a simple, actionable 1-month plan for someone starting their journey towards better health and longevity. Focus on 3 key areas…

Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)854 words
Here’s a simple, actionable 1-month plan designed for absolute beginners. It focuses on diet, movement (exercise), and sleep—the 3 most impactful, science-backed pillars for health and longevity. Each week builds gently on the last, prioritizing tiny, sustainable habits over drastic changes.
Read the full answer
Ternary Bonsai 2 27B729 words
1-Month Foundation Plan: Health & Longevity How to Use This Plan Pick one area per week's focus while maintaining the other two at a baseline level. The point is consistency over intensity. You're building a habit identity, not a transformation.
Read the full answer

Startup Pitch Teardown

Here's a pitch deck summary for a startup called "MindMeld AI": **Slide 1 - Vision:** "We're building the future of human-AI collaboration.…

Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)644 words
Based on a rigorous analysis of neuroscience, market realities, and startup best practices, here are the 3 weakest claims in the MindMeld AI pitch deck, with evidence-backed critiques and concrete fixes: Weakest Claim #1: Slide 1 Vision – "Predicts what you want to type *before you think it*" Why it's weak: Violates…
Read the full answer
Ternary Bonsai 2 27B1,109 words
The 3 Weakest Claims in the MindMeld AI Pitch "FDA Clearance (40% of $15M)" — Slide 7 The claim: They're allocating $6M (40% of the entire raise) toward "FDA clearance" for a consumer EEG headband that decodes thoughts into text for everyday smartphone use.
Read the full answer

Explain Like I'm a Specific Expert

Explain how a large language model (like GPT or Claude) learns and generates text to each of these three audiences: 1. **An experienced…

Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)1,200 words
For the Experienced Software Engineer (Skeptical Builder) Forget "next word prediction" as a simplistic heuristic—it's the emergent consequence of a massively parallel, distributed state machine solving a high-dimensional compression problem.
Read the full answer
Ternary Bonsai 2 27B1,636 words
For the Distributed-Systems Engineer Think of the model as a single, enormous state object—roughly 150 billion floating-point parameters—that has been trained offline over months on a cluster of thousands of GPUs.
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)
Ternary Bonsai 2 27B
Ternary Bonsai 2 27BRunner-up

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) has the edge: bigger model tier, bigger context window.

Ternary Bonsai 2 27B costs 8.0x less per token.

Too close to call
API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)
Input
$0.40
Output
$4.00
Ternary Bonsai 2 27B
Input
$0.07
5.3× cheaper
Output
$0.50
8.0× cheaper

Ternary Bonsai 2 27B is cheaper on both: 5.3× input, 8.0× output.

Where to run it

1 host

Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)

No hosts listed on OpenRouter.

Ternary Bonsai 2 27B1 host
HostInOutContextUptime
DDarkbloomint4$0.07 in·$0.50 out·262k·100% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 23 Sep 2026.

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) is developed by Qwen while Ternary Bonsai 2 27B is developed by PrismML. Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) has a 1.0M token context window vs Ternary Bonsai 2 27B's 262K. You can compare their actual outputs across 9 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) and Ternary Bonsai 2 27B each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 9 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) costs $0.4/M input tokens and Ternary Bonsai 2 27B costs $0.075/M input tokens. Ternary Bonsai 2 27B is $0.33/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) and Ternary Bonsai 2 27B across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) logoDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp logo
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpLanded Sep 2026
Ternary Bonsai 2 27B logoSolar Pro 4 logo
Ternary Bonsai 2 27B vs Solar Pro 4Landed Sep 2026
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) logoHy3 logo
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) vs Hy3Landed Sep 2026
Ternary Bonsai 2 27B logoQwen3.7 Flash logo
Ternary Bonsai 2 27B vs Qwen3.7 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) logoLing 3.0 Flash logo
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) vs Ling 3.0 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Ternary Bonsai 2 27B logoMuse Glimmer 30B logo
Ternary Bonsai 2 27B vs Muse Glimmer 30BLanded Sep 2026
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) logoGLM 5.3 logo
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) vs GLM 5.3Landed Sep 2026
Ternary Bonsai 2 27B logoGLM 5.3 Flash logo
Ternary Bonsai 2 27B vs GLM 5.3 FlashLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) logoQwen3.7 Flash logo
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) vs Qwen3.7 FlashSame lab
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) logoQwen3.8 Flash logo
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) vs Qwen3.8 FlashSame lab
Ternary Bonsai 2 27B logoMercury 2.5 Preview logo
Ternary Bonsai 2 27B vs Mercury 2.5 PreviewSame size
Ternary Bonsai 2 27B logoNemotron 3.5 Lightning logo
Ternary Bonsai 2 27B vs Nemotron 3.5 LightningSame size
Ternary Bonsai 2 27B logoDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 logo
Ternary Bonsai 2 27B vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813New provider
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) logoDeepSeek V4.1 Flash logo
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashSame size
Ternary Bonsai 2 27B logoDevstral 2 2512 logo
Ternary Bonsai 2 27B vs Devstral 2 2512New provider
Ternary Bonsai 2 27B logoMistral Devstral Medium logo
Ternary Bonsai 2 27B vs Mistral Devstral MediumSame size

Model pages

Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) logo
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)37 outputs, specs and price
Ternary Bonsai 2 27B logo
Ternary Bonsai 2 27B9 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed