What is the difference between Qwen Plus 0728 and Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507?

Both are developed by Qwen but target different use cases. Qwen Plus 0728 has a 1.0M token context window vs Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507's 262K. You can compare their actual outputs across 55 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, Qwen Plus 0728 or Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507?

It depends on your use case. Qwen Plus 0728 and Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 55 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does Qwen Plus 0728 cost compared to Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507?

Qwen Plus 0728 costs $0.4/M input tokens and Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 costs $0.071/M input tokens. Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is $0.33/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare Qwen Plus 0728 and Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Qwen Plus 0728 and Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

What is the difference between Qwen Plus 0728 and Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507?

Both are developed by Qwen but target different use cases. Qwen Plus 0728 has a 1.0M token context window vs Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507's 262K. You can compare their actual outputs across 55 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, Qwen Plus 0728 or Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507?

It depends on your use case. Qwen Plus 0728 and Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 55 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does Qwen Plus 0728 cost compared to Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507?

Qwen Plus 0728 costs $0.4/M input tokens and Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 costs $0.071/M input tokens. Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is $0.33/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare Qwen Plus 0728 and Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Qwen Plus 0728 and Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Qwen Plus 0728 vs Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507: Which Is Better?

Updated Sep 2025

Our Verdict

Qwen Plus 0728

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507

No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is 4.2x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.

Too close to call

What do Qwen Plus 0728 and Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 say about your brand?

10 models, one question, verbatim receipts.

or peek at a demo: Notion Linear Vercel

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Qwen Plus 0728

Input

$0.40

Output

$1.20

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507

Input

$0.07

5.6× cheaper

Output

$0.28

4.2× cheaper

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is cheaper on both — 5.6× input, 4.2× output

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity

62%

Qwen Plus 0728 uses 3.4x more hedging

Qwen Plus 0728

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507

55%Vocabulary54%

20wSentence Length14w

0.43Hedging0.12

5.9Bold7.5

4.1Lists4.2

0.68Emoji0.68

0.84Headings0.93

0.16Transitions0.12

Based on 22 + 16 text responses

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Qwen Plus 0728 vs MiniMax M3New provider

Qwen Plus 0728 vs Ox AlphaNew provider

Qwen Plus 0728 vs Claude Sonnet 4New provider

Updated Sep 2025

Our Verdict

Qwen Plus 0728

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507

No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is 4.2x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.

Too close to call

What do Qwen Plus 0728 and Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 say about your brand?

10 models, one question, verbatim receipts.

or peek at a demo: Notion Linear Vercel

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Qwen Plus 0728

Input

$0.40

Output

$1.20

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507

Input

$0.07

5.6× cheaper

Output

$0.28

4.2× cheaper

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is cheaper on both — 5.6× input, 4.2× output

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity

62%

Qwen Plus 0728 uses 3.4x more hedging

Qwen Plus 0728

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507

55%Vocabulary54%

20wSentence Length14w

0.43Hedging0.12

5.9Bold7.5

4.1Lists4.2

0.68Emoji0.68

0.84Headings0.93

0.16Transitions0.12

Based on 22 + 16 text responses

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Qwen Plus 0728 vs MiniMax M3New provider

Qwen Plus 0728 vs Ox AlphaNew provider

Qwen Plus 0728 vs Claude Sonnet 4New provider