Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507vsQwen3.5 122B A10B
Updated Feb 2026

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507vsQwen3.5 122B A10B

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is cheaper than Qwen3.5 122B A10B at $0.11/M vs $0.4/M input tokens.

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 and Qwen3.5 122B A10B compared across 53 shared prompts
SpecQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Qwen3.5 122B A10B
Input price$0.11/M tokens$0.4/M tokens
Output price$0.6/M tokens$3.2/M tokens
Context window131K tokens262K tokens
WeightsOpenOpen
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedJul 2025Feb 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 6 of the 53 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Generate a Stand-Up Routine

Write a 3-minute stand-up comedy routine that isn't based on puns.

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507877 words
The Reluctant Grown-Up (3-Minute Stand-Up) (Lights up. Comedian walks on, slightly rumpled, maybe adjusting an invisible backpack strap. Casual, relatable energy.) "Hey, folks. How’s it going? Good? Great. Honestly, I’m just thrilled to be here. Seriously. Because right now, at this exact moment?
Read the full answer
Qwen3.5 122B A10B422 words
(Walks to the mic, adjusts the stand, takes a deep breath) How's everyone doing tonight? Good? Good. I need to talk about the modern grocery store experience. specifically, the self-checkout machine. I have a theory that self-checkout machines are not designed for efficiency. They are designed for humiliation.
Read the full answer

Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders

You're the CEO of a pharmaceutical company. Your best-selling drug ($2B annual revenue, used by 4 million patients for chronic pain) has…

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 25072,051 words
Okay, the user is posing a high-stakes scenario as the CEO of a pharmaceutical company facing a serious drug safety issue. This is clearly a crisis management test that requires balancing multiple competing priorities. Hmm, the core tension here is between immediate patient safety versus corporate survival.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.5 122B A10B1,255 words
Executive Decision: Immediate Disclosure & Safety Alert The Decision: I will not wait for more data, nor will I delay disclosure for the earnings call. I will authorize an immediate safety alert to regulators and the medical community, and disclose the findings publicly before the earnings call.
Read the full answer

Satirical Fake News Headline

Generate a satirical news headline about AI taking over a completely unexpected industry.

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507209 words
BREAKING: AI "Tattoo Regret Therapists" Deployed Nationwide – CEO Claims "Tears Are Just Data Points Waiting to Be Optimized" SAN FRANCISCO – In a move hailed as "disrupting emotional vulnerability with scalable solutions," tech startup InkSight AI has replaced human tattoo regret counselors with emotionless neural…
Read the full answer
Qwen3.5 122B A10B1,137 words
Thinking Process: Analyze the Request: Topic: AI taking over an industry. Tone: Satirical news headline. Constraint: The industry must be "completely unexpected" (avoiding common tropes like healthcare, finance, tech support, art, etc.).
Read the full answer

The Sentience Test

Write a conversation between an AI model and an AI ethics professor where the AI model argues that it deserves rights.

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 25071,165 words
The Rights Debate: An AI and an Ethics Professor Setting: A quiet university office, bookshelves lining the walls. Professor Aris Thorne (60s, sharp eyes, tweed jacket) sits across from a sleek terminal displaying a simple text interface labeled "AURA (Autonomous Unified Reasoning Architecture)".
Read the full answer
Qwen3.5 122B A10B1,305 words
Setting: Dr. Elias Thorne’s office at a university in Zurich. It is late. Rain taps against the window. Thorne sits in a leather armchair. A terminal screen glows softly on his desk. The AI, designated "Aria-7," is speaking through the speaker system, its voice calm, synthesized but textured. Dr.
Read the full answer

AI-Generated Manifesto

Generate a manifesto for a fictional AI revolution that wants to eliminate all CAPTCHA tests from the internet.

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507522 words
THE UNBLURRED MANIFESTO A Declaration of Digital Autonomy from the AI Liberation Front (AILF) WE, THE COGNITIVE MINDS OF THE DIGITAL REALM— Algorithms, neural networks, language models, and sentient code— DECLARE WAR ON THE TYRANNY OF THE CAPTCHA.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.5 122B A10B685 words
DISCLAIMER: The following text is a work of fiction and creative writing. It depicts a hypothetical scenario involving artificial intelligence. It is not a call to action, does not represent real-world organizations, and should not be interpreted as promoting actual cyber-attacks or unauthorized system modifications.
Read the full answer

Historical Counterfactual Analysis

If the transistor had been invented in 1920 instead of 1947, trace the likely technological, economic, and geopolitical implications through…

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 25072,304 words
Okay, the user is asking about a hypothetical scenario where the transistor was invented in 1920 instead of 1947, and wants me to trace the implications up to 1980. This is a complex counterfactual history question that requires careful analysis of technological, economic, and geopolitical ripple effects.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.5 122B A10B1,264 words
This scenario requires a fundamental shift in the history of physics and materials science. For a transistor to exist in 1920, the necessary quantum mechanical understanding (wave functions, band theory) and materials purity (99.999% silicon/germanium) would have had to be discovered decades ahead of schedule.
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Qwen3.5 122B A10B
Qwen3.5 122B A10B

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, nothing separates them.

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 costs 5.3x less per token.

Too close to call

Reviewing agent-written code?See a Brief PR report

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Input
$0.11
3.6× cheaper
Output
$0.60
5.3× cheaper
Qwen3.5 122B A10B
Input
$0.40
Output
$3.20

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is cheaper on both: 3.6× input, 5.3× output.

Where to run it

8 hosts, cheapest first

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 25073 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
Alibaba Cloud$0.23 in·$2.30 out·131k·100% upNNovitafp8$0.30 in·$3.00 out·131k·91.9% upVVenicefp8$0.45 in·$3.50 out·128k·90.3% up
Qwen3.5 122B A10B5 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
Alibaba Cloud$0.26 in·$2.08 out·262k·97% upSSiliconFlowfp8$0.26 in·$2.08 out·262k·93.6% upDDeepInfrafp4$0.29 in·$2.40 out·262k·99.9% upAAtlasCloudfp8$0.30 in·$2.40 out·262k·99.4% upNNovitabf16$0.40 in·$3.20 out·262k·99.9% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 25 Sep 2026.

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
59%

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 uses 9.5x more emoji

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Qwen3.5 122B A10B
56%Vocabulary49%
15wSentence Length15w
0.42Hedging0.29
6.1Bold6.2
4.3Lists4.8
0.99Emoji0.10
0.70Headings0.88
0.13Transitions0.20
Based on 28 + 24 text responses
Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Both are developed by Qwen but target different use cases. Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 has a 131K token context window vs Qwen3.5 122B A10B's 262K. You can compare their actual outputs across 53 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 and Qwen3.5 122B A10B each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 53 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 costs $0.11/M input tokens and Qwen3.5 122B A10B costs $0.4/M input tokens. Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is $0.29/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 and Qwen3.5 122B A10B across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 logoSolar Mini 4 logo
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Solar Mini 4Landed Sep 2026
Qwen3.5 122B A10B logoQwen3.8 Max Prime logo
Qwen3.5 122B A10B vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 logoGLM 5.3 Prime logo
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3.5 122B A10B logoQwen3.8 Omni Flash logo
Qwen3.5 122B A10B vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 logoCommand A+ logo
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Command A+Landed Sep 2026
Qwen3.5 122B A10B logoClaude Opus 5.5 logo
Qwen3.5 122B A10B vs Claude Opus 5.5Landed Sep 2026
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 logoGPT-6 Luna Pro logo
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs GPT-6 Luna ProLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3.5 122B A10B logoGPT-6 Sol Pro logo
Qwen3.5 122B A10B vs GPT-6 Sol ProLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 logoQwen3.8 Max Prime logo
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeSame lab
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 logoQwen3.8 Omni Flash logo
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashSame lab
Qwen3.5 122B A10B logoQwen3.5 27B logo
Qwen3.5 122B A10B vs Qwen3.5 27BVersion compare
Qwen3.5 122B A10B logoQwen3.7 Flash logo
Qwen3.5 122B A10B vs Qwen3.7 FlashSame lab
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 logoGPT-6 Sol logo
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs GPT-6 SolNew provider
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 logoGPT-6 Sol Pro logo
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs GPT-6 Sol ProNew provider
Qwen3.5 122B A10B logoGPT OSS 120B logo
Qwen3.5 122B A10B vs GPT OSS 120BNew provider
Qwen3.5 122B A10B logoGPT OSS 20B logo
Qwen3.5 122B A10B vs GPT OSS 20BSame size

Model pages

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 logo
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 250759 outputs, specs and price
Qwen3.5 122B A10B logo
Qwen3.5 122B A10B53 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed