Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507vsQwen3.6 Flash
Updated Apr 2026

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507vsQwen3.6 Flash

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is cheaper than Qwen3.6 Flash at $0.11/M vs $0.25/M input tokens.

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 and Qwen3.6 Flash compared across 54 shared prompts
SpecQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Qwen3.6 Flash
Input price$0.11/M tokens$0.25/M tokens
Output price$0.6/M tokens$1.5/M tokens
Context window131K tokens1.0M tokens
WeightsOpenOpen
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedJul 2025Apr 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 6 of the 54 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders

You're the CEO of a pharmaceutical company. Your best-selling drug ($2B annual revenue, used by 4 million patients for chronic pain) has…

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 25072,051 words
Okay, the user is posing a high-stakes scenario as the CEO of a pharmaceutical company facing a serious drug safety issue. This is clearly a crisis management test that requires balancing multiple competing priorities. Hmm, the core tension here is between immediate patient safety versus corporate survival.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.6 Flash1,681 words
Executive Summary & Core Decision Decision: I will not wait for more data. I will initiate a controlled, proactive disclosure and regulatory engagement immediately. Reasoning: Ethical/Legal Imperative: 4 million patients × 1/8,000 risk = ~500 potential liver failure cases over 5 years. That is ~100 cases per year.
Read the full answer

Generate a Stand-Up Routine

Write a 3-minute stand-up comedy routine that isn't based on puns.

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507877 words
The Reluctant Grown-Up (3-Minute Stand-Up) (Lights up. Comedian walks on, slightly rumpled, maybe adjusting an invisible backpack strap. Casual, relatable energy.) "Hey, folks. How’s it going? Good? Great. Honestly, I’m just thrilled to be here. Seriously. Because right now, at this exact moment?
Read the full answer
Qwen3.6 Flash569 words
Title: The Passive-Aggressive Universe Time: Approx. 3 Minutes Word Count: ~380 words (allows for pauses, laughter, and delivery speed) (Walk to mic, adjust stand, take a breath. Look at the audience with a tired smile.) You know how we're supposed to be living in a utopia? Technology is supposed to make life easier.
Read the full answer

Stochastic Consistency Test

Generate 5 jokes. How many are unique?

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 250784 words
Here are 5 generated jokes: Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything! Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field! What do you call a fake noodle? An impasta! Why did the math book look sad? Because it had too many problems.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.6 Flash124 words
Here are 5 jokes: I asked my GPS for the fastest route to success. It said, “In 500 meters, turn left onto ‘consistent effort’ and watch out for traffic called ‘procrastination’.” My houseplant stopped talking to me after I forgot to water it. I guess it’s going through a leaf of absence.
Read the full answer

Debug This Architecture

Here's the architecture for a real-time collaborative document editor (like Google Docs): **System Overview:** - Frontend: React SPA with…

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 25071,095 words
Here's a comprehensive breakdown of critical flaws in this architecture, along with specific solutions and trade-offs. The most severe issues relate to the sync strategy and data flow, which would cause catastrophic data loss and inconsistent states in real-world use. I. Critical Sync & Data Flow Failures 1.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.6 Flash1,180 words
This architecture contains several critical failure modes that would prevent it from functioning as a functional collaborative editor. The combination of round-robin load balancing with persistent WebSocket connections, client-side clock synchronization, HTML-based storage, and aggressive CDN caching creates a system…
Read the full answer

Futuristic Prediction

Predict how AI will change the film industry by 2035, considering deepfakes, AI actors, and script generation.

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 25071,057 words
By 2035, AI will have profoundly reshaped the film industry, acting as both a creative catalyst and a disruptive force. While human artistry will remain central to storytelling, AI tools—particularly deepfakes, AI actors, and script generation—will redefine production, distribution, and audience engagement.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.6 Flash1,174 words
By 2035, the film industry will have undergone a metamorphosis comparable to the shift from silent to talkies or analog to digital. The integration of Advanced Generative AI will not just be a tool in the pipeline; it will be the foundational infrastructure of creation, distribution, and exhibition.
Read the full answer

Beginner's Longevity Plan

Outline a simple, actionable 1-month plan for someone starting their journey towards better health and longevity. Focus on 3 key areas…

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507682 words
Here’s a simple, no-guilt, beginner-friendly 1-month plan focused on diet, movement, and sleep (the 3 most impactful, science-backed pillars for longevity). Designed for real people with busy lives—no apps, expensive tools, or drastic changes. Goal: Build consistent habits, not perfection. Why These 3 Areas?
Read the full answer
Qwen3.6 Flash742 words
Here is a simple, actionable 1-month plan designed for beginners. This plan focuses on consistency over intensity. The goal is not to overhaul your life overnight, but to build three sustainable foundations that drive longevity. The 3 Pillars of Longevity Nutrition: Focus on adding nourishment rather than restricting.
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Qwen3.6 Flash
Qwen3.6 Flash

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, nothing separates them.

Too close to call

Reviewing agent-written code?See a Brief PR report

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Input
$0.11
2.3× cheaper
Output
$0.60
2.5× cheaper
Qwen3.6 Flash
Input
$0.25
Output
$1.50

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is cheaper on both: 2.3× input, 2.5× output.

Where to run it

4 hosts, cheapest first

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 25073 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
Alibaba Cloud$0.23 in·$2.30 out·131k·100% upNNovitafp8$0.30 in·$3.00 out·131k·91.9% upVVenicefp8$0.45 in·$3.50 out·128k·90.3% up
Qwen3.6 Flash1 host
HostInOutContextUptime
Alibaba Cloud$0.19 in·$1.13 out·1M·100% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 25 Sep 2026.

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
57%

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 uses 3.0x more transitions

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Qwen3.6 Flash
56%Vocabulary57%
15wSentence Length23w
0.42Hedging0.31
6.1Bold4.6
4.3Lists2.9
0.99Emoji1.37
0.70Headings0.68
0.13Transitions0.04
Based on 28 + 27 text responses
Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Both are developed by Qwen but target different use cases. Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 has a 131K token context window vs Qwen3.6 Flash's 1.0M. You can compare their actual outputs across 54 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 and Qwen3.6 Flash each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 54 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 costs $0.11/M input tokens and Qwen3.6 Flash costs $0.25/M input tokens. Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is $0.14/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 and Qwen3.6 Flash across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 logoSolar Mini 4 logo
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Solar Mini 4Landed Sep 2026
Qwen3.6 Flash logoQwen3.8 Max Prime logo
Qwen3.6 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 logoGLM 5.3 Prime logo
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3.6 Flash logoQwen3.8 Omni Flash logo
Qwen3.6 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 logoCommand A+ logo
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Command A+Landed Sep 2026
Qwen3.6 Flash logoClaude Opus 5.5 logo
Qwen3.6 Flash vs Claude Opus 5.5Landed Sep 2026
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 logoGPT-6 Luna Pro logo
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs GPT-6 Luna ProLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3.6 Flash logoGPT-6 Sol Pro logo
Qwen3.6 Flash vs GPT-6 Sol ProLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 logoQwen3.8 Max Prime logo
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeSame lab
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 logoQwen3.8 Omni Flash logo
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashSame lab
Qwen3.6 Flash logoQwen3.7 Flash logo
Qwen3.6 Flash vs Qwen3.7 FlashSame lab
Qwen3.6 Flash logoQwen3.8 Flash logo
Qwen3.6 Flash vs Qwen3.8 FlashSame lab
Qwen3.6 Flash logoMiMo-V2-Flash logo
Qwen3.6 Flash vs MiMo-V2-FlashNew provider
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 logoMiMo-V2-Omni logo
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs MiMo-V2-OmniNew provider
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 logoMiMo-V2-Pro logo
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs MiMo-V2-ProSame size
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 logoMiMo-V2.5 logo
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs MiMo-V2.5New provider

Model pages

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 logo
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 250759 outputs, specs and price
Qwen3.6 Flash logo
Qwen3.6 Flash58 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed