Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 Max Preview
Compare Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 and Qwen: Qwen3.6 Max Preview, both from Qwen, context windows of 131K vs 262K, tested across 49 shared challenges.
Our Verdict
Qwen: Qwen3.6 Max Preview
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Runner-up
No community votes yet. On paper, Qwen: Qwen3.6 Max Preview has the edge — newer, bigger context window.
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is 10x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Input
$0.11
9.5× cheaper
Output
$0.60
10× cheaper
Qwen: Qwen3.6 Max Preview
Input
$1.04
Output
$6.24
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is cheaper on both — 9.5× input, 10× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
55%
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 uses 7.9x more transitions
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Qwen: Qwen3.6 Max Preview
56%Vocabulary62%
14wSentence Length21w
0.37Hedging0.22
5.7Bold3.8
4.0Lists2.9
0.54Emoji1.88
0.70Headings0.62
0.14Transitions0.02
Based on 22 + 26 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
