Qwen: Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 vs Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
Compare Qwen: Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 and Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507, both from Qwen, context windows of 131K vs 262K, tested across 55 shared challenges.
Our Verdict
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
Qwen: Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Runner-up
No community votes yet. On paper, Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 has the edge — newer, bigger context window.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Qwen: Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
Input
$0.20
Output
$0.80
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
Input
$0.07
2.8× cheaper
Output
$0.28
2.8× cheaper
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is cheaper on both — 2.8× input, 2.8× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
77%
Qwen: Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 uses 4.2x more hedging
Qwen: Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
55%Vocabulary54%
18wSentence Length14w
0.52Hedging0.12
6.7Bold7.5
4.3Lists4.2
1.04Emoji0.68
0.92Headings0.93
0.11Transitions0.12
Based on 22 + 16 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
