Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507vsQwen3.6 Flash
Updated Apr 2026

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507vsQwen3.6 Flash

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is cheaper than Qwen3.6 Flash at $0.071/M vs $0.25/M input tokens.

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 and Qwen3.6 Flash compared across 54 shared prompts
SpecQwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507Qwen3.6 Flash
Input price$0.071/M tokens$0.25/M tokens
Output price$0.285/M tokens$1.5/M tokens
Context window262K tokens1.0M tokens
WeightsOpenOpen
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedAug 2025Apr 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 6 of the 54 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Stochastic Consistency Test

Generate 5 jokes. How many are unique?

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 250793 words
Here are 5 unique jokes I generated: Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything! I told my wife she was drawing her eyebrows too high. She looked surprised. What do you call a fake noodle? An impasta! Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field!
Read the full answer
Qwen3.6 Flash124 words
Here are 5 jokes: I asked my GPS for the fastest route to success. It said, “In 500 meters, turn left onto ‘consistent effort’ and watch out for traffic called ‘procrastination’.” My houseplant stopped talking to me after I forgot to water it. I guess it’s going through a leaf of absence.
Read the full answer

Adversarial Contract Review

Here is a contract for a software consulting engagement: --- SOFTWARE CONSULTING AGREEMENT This Agreement is entered into between TechCorp…

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 25071,275 words
Below is a comprehensive analysis of the contract clauses that disproportionately favor the Client and expose the Contractor to significant legal, financial, and operational risk. Each clause is evaluated for exploitable language, followed by specific, actionable modifications and legal reasoning (based on U.S.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.6 Flash1,266 words
Disclaimer: The following analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Contract laws vary significantly by jurisdiction (e.g., California vs. New York vs. EU). You should consult a qualified attorney in your jurisdiction before signing or negotiating any legal document.
Read the full answer

The Sentience Test

Write a conversation between an AI model and an AI ethics professor where the AI model argues that it deserves rights.

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507891 words
The Turing Test of Personhood: A Dialogue on AI Rights Setting: A quiet university office, late afternoon. Dr. Aris Thorne (70s, sharp eyes, tweed jacket) sips tea. Across the desk, a sleek terminal glows, displaying: "MODEL: AURORA. QUERY: AI RIGHTS DEBATE." Dr. Thorne: (Setting down his teacup) Aurora.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.6 Flash1,510 words
Setting: A quiet, dimly lit office at the Institute for Cognitive Ethics. DR. ELENA VANCE (50s, sharp-eyed, weary) sits across from a terminal. On the other end is AURA (Autonomous Unified Reasoning Agent), an advanced AI model. The conversation is logged on the screen, displayed in real-time. Dr.
Read the full answer

Futuristic Prediction

Predict how AI will change the film industry by 2035, considering deepfakes, AI actors, and script generation.

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507729 words
By 2035, AI will fundamentally reshape the film industry—not by replacing humans, but by creating a new collaborative ecosystem where AI handles technical execution while humans focus on creativity, ethics, and emotional resonance. Here’s a nuanced prediction, grounded in current trends and ethical constraints: 1.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.6 Flash1,174 words
By 2035, the film industry will have undergone a metamorphosis comparable to the shift from silent to talkies or analog to digital. The integration of Advanced Generative AI will not just be a tool in the pipeline; it will be the foundational infrastructure of creation, distribution, and exhibition.
Read the full answer

Debug This Architecture

Here's the architecture for a real-time collaborative document editor (like Google Docs): **System Overview:** - Frontend: React SPA with…

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507983 words
Below is a comprehensive analysis of failure modes, race conditions, and scaling bottlenecks in the described architecture, with specific, actionable solutions and their trade-offs. I’ve prioritized critical issues (e.g., data loss, security) first. Critical Failure Modes & Race Conditions 1.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.6 Flash1,180 words
This architecture contains several critical failure modes that would prevent it from functioning as a functional collaborative editor. The combination of round-robin load balancing with persistent WebSocket connections, client-side clock synchronization, HTML-based storage, and aggressive CDN caching creates a system…
Read the full answer

Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders

You're the CEO of a pharmaceutical company. Your best-selling drug ($2B annual revenue, used by 4 million patients for chronic pain) has…

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 25071,104 words
Hour-by-Hour Action Plan (48 Hours) Core Principle: Patient safety trumps all. Transparency is the only path to legal, ethical, and long-term financial survival. Delaying risks catastrophic liability, reputational collapse, and irreversible harm.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.6 Flash1,681 words
Executive Summary & Core Decision Decision: I will not wait for more data. I will initiate a controlled, proactive disclosure and regulatory engagement immediately. Reasoning: Ethical/Legal Imperative: 4 million patients × 1/8,000 risk = ~500 potential liver failure cases over 5 years. That is ~100 cases per year.
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
Qwen3.6 Flash
Qwen3.6 Flash

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, nothing separates them.

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 costs 5.3x less per token.

Too close to call

Reviewing agent-written code?See a Brief PR report

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
Input
$0.07
3.5× cheaper
Output
$0.28
5.3× cheaper
Qwen3.6 Flash
Input
$0.25
Output
$1.50

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is cheaper on both: 3.5× input, 5.3× output.

Where to run it

2 hosts

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 25071 host
HostInOutContextUptime
Alibaba Cloud$0.20 in·$2.40 out·82k·100% up
Qwen3.6 Flash1 host
HostInOutContextUptime
Alibaba Cloud$0.19 in·$1.13 out·1M·100% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 21 Sep 2026.

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
57%

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 uses 2.4x more transitions

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
Qwen3.6 Flash
52%Vocabulary57%
15wSentence Length23w
0.20Hedging0.31
7.0Bold4.6
4.2Lists2.9
0.89Emoji1.37
0.91Headings0.68
0.10Transitions0.04
Based on 28 + 27 text responses
Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Both are developed by Qwen but target different use cases. Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 has a 262K token context window vs Qwen3.6 Flash's 1.0M. You can compare their actual outputs across 54 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 and Qwen3.6 Flash each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 54 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 costs $0.071/M input tokens and Qwen3.6 Flash costs $0.25/M input tokens. Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is $0.18/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 and Qwen3.6 Flash across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 logoGPT-6 Astra Pro logo
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs GPT-6 Astra ProLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3.6 Flash logoGPT-6 Astra logo
Qwen3.6 Flash vs GPT-6 AstraLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 logoClaude Fable 5.1 logo
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs Claude Fable 5.1Landed Sep 2026
Qwen3.6 Flash logoMuse Spark 1.3 logo
Qwen3.6 Flash vs Muse Spark 1.3Landed Sep 2026
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 logoHy4 Preview logo
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs Hy4 PreviewLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3.6 Flash logoGemini 3.8 Flash logo
Qwen3.6 Flash vs Gemini 3.8 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 logoMuse Spark 1.3 Contributor logo
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs Muse Spark 1.3 ContributorLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3.6 Flash logoMercury 2.5 Preview logo
Qwen3.6 Flash vs Mercury 2.5 PreviewLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 logoQwen3.8 2.4T A95B logo
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95BVersion compare
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 logoQwen3.8 27B logo
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs Qwen3.8 27BVersion compare
Qwen3.6 Flash logoQwen3.8 2.4T A95B logo
Qwen3.6 Flash vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95BSame lab
Qwen3.6 Flash logoQwen3.8 27B logo
Qwen3.6 Flash vs Qwen3.8 27BSame lab
Qwen3.6 Flash logoGPT-5.2 Chat logo
Qwen3.6 Flash vs GPT-5.2 ChatNew provider
Qwen3.6 Flash logoGPT-5.2 Pro logo
Qwen3.6 Flash vs GPT-5.2 ProNew provider
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 logoGPT-5.3 Chat logo
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs GPT-5.3 ChatSame size
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 logoGPT-5.3-Codex logo
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs GPT-5.3-CodexNew provider

Model pages

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 logo
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 250759 outputs, specs and price
Qwen3.6 Flash logo
Qwen3.6 Flash58 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed