Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs Qwen3.8 Max
Compare Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 and Qwen3.8 Max, both from Qwen, context windows of 262K vs 1.0M, tested across 21 shared challenges.
Our Verdict
Qwen3.8 Max
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507Runner-up
No community votes yet. On paper, Qwen3.8 Max has the edge — bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window.
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is 21x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Slight edge
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
Input
$0.07
28× cheaper
Output
$0.28
21× cheaper
Qwen3.8 Max
Input
$2.00
Output
$6.00
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is cheaper on both — 28× input, 21× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
38%
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 uses 67.9x more emoji
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
Qwen3.8 Max
54%Vocabulary48%
14wSentence Length17w
0.12Hedging0.95
7.5Bold4.3
4.2Lists8.2
0.68Emoji0.00
0.93Headings1.92
0.12Transitions0.02
Based on 16 + 13 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
