Qwen3 30B A3B
Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.
Qwen3 30B A3B vs Qwen3 Coder
Compare Qwen3 30B A3B and Qwen3 Coder, both from Qwen, in 39 community votes, qwen3 coder wins 77% of head-to-head duels, tested across 37 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.
Which is better, Qwen3 30B A3B or Qwen3 Coder?
Qwen3 Coder is the better choice overall, winning 77% of 39 blind community votes on Rival. Qwen3 30B A3B costs $0/M input tokens vs $0.22/M for Qwen3 Coder. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between Qwen3 30B A3B and Qwen3 Coder
Qwen3 30B A3B is made by qwen while Qwen3 Coder is from qwen. On pricing, Qwen3 30B A3B costs $0/M input tokens vs $0.22/M for Qwen3 Coder. In community voting, In 39 community votes, Qwen3 Coder wins 77% of head-to-head duels.
In 39 community votes, Qwen3 Coder wins 77% of head-to-head duels. Qwen3 30B A3B leads in Analysis, while Qwen3 Coder leads in Image Generation, Web Design, Reasoning. Based on blind community voting from the Rival open dataset of 39+ human preference judgments for this pair.
Image Generation: Qwen3 Coder wins 100% of votes
Analysis: Qwen3 30B A3B wins 57% of votes
Web Design: Qwen3 Coder wins 86% of votes
Reasoning: Qwen3 Coder wins 75% of votes
Conversation: Qwen3 Coder wins 67% of votes
Our Verdict
Qwen3 CoderWinner
Qwen3 30B A3BRunner-up
Pick Qwen3 Coder. In 39 blind votes, Qwen3 Coder wins 77% of the time. That's not luck.
Pick Qwen3 30B A3B for Analysis. Pick Qwen3 Coder for Image Generation, Web Design, Reasoning.
Clear winner
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
87%
Qwen3 Coder uses 142.7x more headings
Qwen3 30B A3B
Qwen3 Coder
60%Vocabulary61%
11wSentence Length72w
0.24Hedging0.61
7.6Bold4.7
4.6Lists5.6
0.36Emoji0.12
0.00Headings1.43
0.06Transitions0.20
Based on 4 + 22 text responses
vsAsk them anything yourself
279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.
We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.
Free preview13 of 58 slides
FAQ