What is the difference between Qwen3.5 122B A10B and Qwen3.5 397B A17B?

Both are developed by Qwen but target different use cases. Qwen3.5 122B A10B has a 262K token context window vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B's 262K. You can compare their actual outputs across 53 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, Qwen3.5 122B A10B or Qwen3.5 397B A17B?

It depends on your use case. Qwen3.5 122B A10B and Qwen3.5 397B A17B each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 53 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does Qwen3.5 122B A10B cost compared to Qwen3.5 397B A17B?

Qwen3.5 122B A10B costs $0.4/M input tokens and Qwen3.5 397B A17B costs $0.6/M input tokens. Qwen3.5 122B A10B is $0.20/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare Qwen3.5 122B A10B and Qwen3.5 397B A17B on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Qwen3.5 122B A10B and Qwen3.5 397B A17B across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

What is the difference between Qwen3.5 122B A10B and Qwen3.5 397B A17B?

Both are developed by Qwen but target different use cases. Qwen3.5 122B A10B has a 262K token context window vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B's 262K. You can compare their actual outputs across 53 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, Qwen3.5 122B A10B or Qwen3.5 397B A17B?

It depends on your use case. Qwen3.5 122B A10B and Qwen3.5 397B A17B each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 53 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does Qwen3.5 122B A10B cost compared to Qwen3.5 397B A17B?

Qwen3.5 122B A10B costs $0.4/M input tokens and Qwen3.5 397B A17B costs $0.6/M input tokens. Qwen3.5 122B A10B is $0.20/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare Qwen3.5 122B A10B and Qwen3.5 397B A17B on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Qwen3.5 122B A10B and Qwen3.5 397B A17B across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Updated Feb 2026

Qwen3.5 122B A10BvsQwen3.5 397B A17B

Qwen3.5 122B A10B is cheaper than Qwen3.5 397B A17B at $0.4/M vs $0.6/M input tokens.

Qwen3.5 122B A10B and Qwen3.5 397B A17B compared across 53 shared prompts
Spec	Qwen3.5 122B A10B	Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Input price	$0.4/M tokens	$0.6/M tokens
Output price	$3.2/M tokens	$3.6/M tokens
Context window	262K tokens	262K tokens
Released	Feb 2026	Feb 2026
SWE-bench Verified	72.0%	76.4%

Our Verdict

Qwen3.5 397B A17B

Qwen3.5 122B A10BRunner-up

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Qwen3.5 397B A17B has the edge: bigger model tier.

Too close to call

What do Qwen3.5 122B A10B and Qwen3.5 397B A17B say about your brand?

10 models, one question, verbatim receipts.

or peek at a demo: Notion Linear Vercel

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Qwen3.5 122B A10B

Input

$0.40

1.5× cheaper

Output

$3.20

1.1× cheaper

Qwen3.5 397B A17B

Input

$0.60

Output

$3.60

Qwen3.5 122B A10B is cheaper on both — 1.5× input, 1.1× output

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity

89%

Qwen3.5 397B A17B uses 2.2x more emoji

Qwen3.5 122B A10B

Qwen3.5 397B A17B

49%Vocabulary54%

15wSentence Length14w

0.29Hedging0.39

6.2Bold6.9

4.8Lists4.2

0.10Emoji0.23

0.88Headings0.93

0.20Transitions0.17

Based on 24 + 23 text responses

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Qwen3.5 122B A10B vs Ox AlphaNew provider

Qwen3.5 122B A10B vs MiniMax M3New provider

Qwen3.5 122B A10B vs GPT-5New provider

Qwen3.5 122B A10B vs Llama 4 MaverickNew provider

Qwen3.5 122B A10B vs OpenAI o3New provider

Qwen3.5 122B A10B vs o3 MiniNew provider

Qwen3.5 122B A10B vs OpenAI o4-miniNew provider

Qwen3.5 122B A10B vs OpenAI o4 Mini HighNew provider

Updated Feb 2026

Qwen3.5 122B A10BvsQwen3.5 397B A17B

Qwen3.5 122B A10B is cheaper than Qwen3.5 397B A17B at $0.4/M vs $0.6/M input tokens.

Qwen3.5 122B A10B and Qwen3.5 397B A17B compared across 53 shared prompts
Spec	Qwen3.5 122B A10B	Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Input price	$0.4/M tokens	$0.6/M tokens
Output price	$3.2/M tokens	$3.6/M tokens
Context window	262K tokens	262K tokens
Released	Feb 2026	Feb 2026
SWE-bench Verified	72.0%	76.4%

Our Verdict

Qwen3.5 397B A17B

Qwen3.5 122B A10BRunner-up

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Qwen3.5 397B A17B has the edge: bigger model tier.

Too close to call

What do Qwen3.5 122B A10B and Qwen3.5 397B A17B say about your brand?

10 models, one question, verbatim receipts.

or peek at a demo: Notion Linear Vercel

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Qwen3.5 122B A10B

Input

$0.40

1.5× cheaper

Output

$3.20

1.1× cheaper

Qwen3.5 397B A17B

Input

$0.60

Output

$3.60

Qwen3.5 122B A10B is cheaper on both — 1.5× input, 1.1× output

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity

89%

Qwen3.5 397B A17B uses 2.2x more emoji

Qwen3.5 122B A10B

Qwen3.5 397B A17B

49%Vocabulary54%

15wSentence Length14w

0.29Hedging0.39

6.2Bold6.9

4.8Lists4.2

0.10Emoji0.23

0.88Headings0.93

0.20Transitions0.17

Based on 24 + 23 text responses

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Qwen3.5 122B A10B vs Ox AlphaNew provider

Qwen3.5 122B A10B vs MiniMax M3New provider

Qwen3.5 122B A10B vs GPT-5New provider

Qwen3.5 122B A10B vs Llama 4 MaverickNew provider

Qwen3.5 122B A10B vs OpenAI o3New provider

Qwen3.5 122B A10B vs o3 MiniNew provider

Qwen3.5 122B A10B vs OpenAI o4-miniNew provider

Qwen3.5 122B A10B vs OpenAI o4 Mini HighNew provider