MiniMax M2.7 vs Qwen: Qwen3.5 122B A10B
Compare MiniMax M2.7 by MiniMax against Qwen: Qwen3.5 122B A10B by Qwen, in 6 community votes, qwen: qwen3.5 122b a10b wins 67% of head-to-head duels, context windows of 205K vs 262K, tested across 53 shared challenges.
Image Generation: Qwen: Qwen3.5 122B A10B wins 100% of votes
Our Verdict
Qwen: Qwen3.5 122B A10BWinner
MiniMax M2.7Runner-up
Pick Qwen: Qwen3.5 122B A10B. In 6 blind votes, Qwen: Qwen3.5 122B A10B wins 67% of the time. That's not luck.
Qwen: Qwen3.5 122B A10B particularly excels in Image Generation.
Clear winner
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
MiniMax M2.7
Input
$0.30
1.3× cheaper
Output
$1.20
2.7× cheaper
Qwen: Qwen3.5 122B A10B
Input
$0.40
Output
$3.20
MiniMax M2.7 is cheaper on both — 1.3× input, 2.7× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
38%
MiniMax M2.7 uses 2.7x more emoji
MiniMax M2.7
Qwen: Qwen3.5 122B A10B
56%Vocabulary49%
26wSentence Length15w
0.50Hedging0.29
6.8Bold6.2
3.5Lists4.8
0.28Emoji0.10
1.20Headings0.88
0.11Transitions0.20
Based on 23 + 24 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
