Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B vs Claude Opus 4
Compare Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B by Qwen against Claude Opus 4 by Anthropic, context windows of 262K vs 200K, tested across 35 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.
Which is better, Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B or Claude Opus 4?
Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B and Claude Opus 4 are both competitive models. Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B costs $0.6/M input tokens vs $15/M for Claude Opus 4. Context windows: 262K vs 200K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B and Claude Opus 4
Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B is made by qwen while Claude Opus 4 is from anthropic. Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B has a 262K token context window compared to Claude Opus 4's 200K. On pricing, Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B costs $0.6/M input tokens vs $15/M for Claude Opus 4.
No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.
Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B is 21x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Style Comparison
Claude Opus 4 uses 4.3x more sentence length
Ask them anything yourself
279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.
We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.








