Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B vs Claude Opus 4

Compare Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B by Qwen against Claude Opus 4 by Anthropic, context windows of 262K vs 200K, tested across 35 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.

Which is better, Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B or Claude Opus 4?

Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B and Claude Opus 4 are both competitive models. Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B costs $0.6/M input tokens vs $15/M for Claude Opus 4. Context windows: 262K vs 200K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.

Key Differences Between Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B and Claude Opus 4

Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B is made by qwen while Claude Opus 4 is from anthropic. Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B has a 262K token context window compared to Claude Opus 4's 200K. On pricing, Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B costs $0.6/M input tokens vs $15/M for Claude Opus 4.

Our Verdict
Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Claude Opus 4
Claude Opus 4

No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.

Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B is 21x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.

Too close to call
Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
97%

Claude Opus 4 uses 4.3x more sentence length

Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Claude Opus 4
54%Vocabulary64%
14wSentence Length62w
0.39Hedging0.52
6.9Bold4.4
4.2Lists9.1
0.23Emoji0.11
0.93Headings1.87
0.17Transitions0.27
Based on 23 + 16 text responses
vs

Ask them anything yourself

Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17BClaude Opus 4

279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.

We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.

AI Hallucination Index 2026
Free preview13 of 58 slides
FAQ

Common questions