Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B vs MiniMax M1

Compare Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B by Qwen against MiniMax M1 by MiniMax, in 1 community votes, qwen: qwen3.5 397b a17b wins 100% of head-to-head duels, context windows of 262K vs 1.0M, tested across 26 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.

Which is better, Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B or MiniMax M1?

Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B is the better choice overall, winning 100% of 1 blind community votes on Rival. Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B costs $0.6/M input tokens vs $0.3/M for MiniMax M1. Context windows: 262K vs 1000K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.

Key Differences Between Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B and MiniMax M1

Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B is made by qwen while MiniMax M1 is from minimax. Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B has a 262K token context window compared to MiniMax M1's 1000K. On pricing, Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B costs $0.6/M input tokens vs $0.3/M for MiniMax M1. In community voting, In 1 community votes, Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B wins 100% of head-to-head duels.

In 1 community votes, Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B wins 100% of head-to-head duels. Based on blind community voting from the Rival open dataset of 1+ human preference judgments for this pair.

Our Verdict
Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17BWinner
MiniMax M1
MiniMax M1Runner-up

Pick Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B. In 1 blind votes, Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B wins 100% of the time. That's not luck.

Clear winner
Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
98%

Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B uses 5.3x more transitions

Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B
MiniMax M1
54%Vocabulary53%
14wSentence Length17w
0.39Hedging0.51
6.9Bold7.4
4.2Lists6.2
0.23Emoji0.10
0.93Headings0.86
0.17Transitions0.03
Based on 23 + 14 text responses
vs

Ask them anything yourself

Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17BMiniMax M1

279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.

We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.

AI Hallucination Index 2026
Free preview13 of 58 slides
FAQ

Common questions