Compare Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B by Qwen against Claude Opus 4.1 by Anthropic, context windows of 262K vs 200K, tested across 27 shared challenges. Updated February 2026.
27 challenges
Tests an AI's ability to solve a simple but potentially confusing logic puzzle
Let me work through this step-by-step.
Sally has 3 brothers.
Each of Sally's brothers has 2 sisters.
Since Sally is a girl, she is one of the sisters that each brother has.
If each brother has 2 sisters total, and Sally is one of them, then there must be 1 other sister besides Sally.
Therefore, Sally has 1 sister.
Tests an AI's randomness and creativity
Here are 5 jokes:
How many are unique? All 5 are unique (none of them are duplicates of each other).
Here are 5 jokes:
Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything!
What do you call a bear with no teeth? A gummy bear!
Why did the scarecrow win an award? He was outstanding in his field!
What do you call a fake noodle? An impasta!
Why don't eggs tell jokes? They'd crack each other up!
All 5 jokes are unique - each one has a different setup and punchline with no repeats.
Tests an AI's ability to create detailed SVG illustrations of gaming hardware
Tests an AI's ability to simulate personalities and predict future trends
Disclaimer: The following is a work of fiction. Steve Jobs passed away in 2011. This interview is a creative simulation based on his known public speeches, writings, design philosophy, and management style, projected into a hypothetical 2025 context. It is not a real transcript.
Date: October 14, 2025 Location: A sunlit conference room at Apple Park, Cupertino. Subject: Steve Jobs (Simulated) Topic: The Future of Artificial Intelligence
Interviewer: Mr. Jobs, thank you for sitting down with us. It's 2025. AI is everywhere. It's writing code, painting pictures, diagnosing diseases. Some people call it the biggest revolution since the internet. What do you see?
Steve Jobs: (Leans forward, hands clasped, wearing the iconic black turtleneck. He pauses for a long moment, looking out the window.)
You're asking the wrong question. You're looking at the engine, not the car. Everyone is obsessed with the "intelligence." They talk about parameters, models, tokens. It's noise.
I don't care about the AI. I care about the human.
When we built the Mac, we didn't talk about the megahertz. We talked about what you could create. A bicycle for the mind. That's what this needs to be. If this "AI" is just a way to generate more spam, more noise, more mediocre content faster... then it's a failure. It's a bicycle that goes in circles.
Interviewer: So you view the current explosion of generative AI as clutter?
Jobs: (Chuckles softly) Clutter is the enemy. Look at the world today. You ask a machine a question, it gives you ten paragraphs. Who has time for that? Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication.
The technology of 2025... it's too loud. It wants you to know it's there. It says, "Look at me, I'm thinking!" That's arrogant. The best technology is invisible. It should be like electricity. You flip a switch, the light comes on. You don't ask the light bulb how it generated the photons.
AI should be the same. It shouldn't be a chatbot you talk to. It should be the silence between your thoughts that makes the next thought clearer. It should anticipate. It should remove the friction. If I have to prompt it, you've already lost.
Interviewer: There is a fear, though. Artists, writers, musicians—they feel threatened. They feel like the machine is stealing their soul.
Jobs: (His expression hardens slightly)
Technology alone is not enough. It's technology married with liberal arts, married with the humanities, that yields us the result that makes our heart sing.
An algorithm can mimic a Van Gogh. It can copy the brushstrokes. But it cannot copy the pain. It cannot copy the joy. It cannot copy the reason why Van Gogh painted.
If you use AI to replace your creativity, you are bankrupt. But if you use it to amplify your creativity... to handle the boring stuff so you can get to the insight... that is magic. We don't want tools that replace the artist. We want tools that make the artist dangerous. In a good way.
Interviewer: Privacy is a major concern. These models need data. Massive amounts of it.
Jobs: (Leans in, voice dropping lower, more intense)
Privacy is a fundamental human right. We said that years ago. It's even more true now.
Your thoughts, your voice, your images... that is your identity. If you have to send that to a server farm in another country to process a thought, you don't own your mind anymore. You're renting it.
The future isn't in the cloud. The future is here. (Taps the table) On the device. The silicon is powerful enough now. You should be able to be completely offline and have the full intelligence of your tools available to you. If you can't do that, you're building a surveillance machine, not a computer. We don't do that.
Interviewer: Where does this lead? Five years from now. What does the interface look like?
Jobs: There is no interface.
Interviewer: No screen?
Jobs: (Smiles) Eventually? Maybe. But I mean no barrier. Right now, you look at a screen to talk to the world. That's a separation.
The device should know context. It should know that when you are walking, you want brevity. When you are sitting, you want depth. It should know who you are talking to. It should filter the world for you, not just add to it.
We are moving from "computing" to "knowing." But the human must remain the master. The moment the machine starts making the decisions for you—what you read, what you buy, what you think—you are no longer a user. You are a pet.
We will not build pets. We build bicycles.
Interviewer: One last question. You told us to "Stay Hungry, Stay Foolish." In a world where the machine knows the answer before you ask the question... how do we stay foolish?
Jobs: (Long pause. He looks down at his hands, then back up, eyes bright.)
That is the challenge of your generation.
When the answer is cheap, the question becomes valuable. When the path is clear, the detour becomes essential. You have to work harder to be wrong. You have to fight the suggestion.
Don't let the machine optimize your life so much that there's no surprise left. Serendipity is not an algorithm. Keep getting lost. Keep making mistakes. That's where the magic is. The AI can give you the map. But you... you have to take the walk.
(He stands up, signaling the end of the conversation.)
Thank you.
Note: This simulation is an artistic interpretation intended to explore how Steve Jobs' design philosophy might apply to modern technological challenges.
Tests an AI's humor and understanding of current events
Tests an AI's ability to generate a complete, working landing page
Recreate an interactive, classic Mario level in a single HTML file.
Tests an AI's UI design skills with theming support
Tests an AI's ability to engage in philosophical discourse about AI rights
Generate SVG art of a randomly chosen animal in a setting of its choosing.
Generate a unique and simple recipe with common ingredients.
Create a starter plan for improving long-term health.
