Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B vs Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05

Compare Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B by Qwen against Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 by Google AI, context windows of 262K vs 1.0M, tested across 38 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.

Which is better, Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B or Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05?

Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B and Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 are both competitive models. Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B costs $0.6/M input tokens vs $1.25/M for Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05. Context windows: 262K vs 1049K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.

Key Differences Between Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B and Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05

Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B is made by qwen while Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 is from google. Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B has a 262K token context window compared to Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05's 1049K. On pricing, Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B costs $0.6/M input tokens vs $1.25/M for Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05.

Our Verdict
Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05

No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.

Too close to call
Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
98%

Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B uses 22.8x more emoji

Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
54%Vocabulary51%
14wSentence Length15w
0.39Hedging0.31
6.9Bold4.8
4.2Lists4.1
0.23Emoji0.00
0.93Headings0.98
0.17Transitions0.05
Based on 23 + 20 text responses
vs

Ask them anything yourself

Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17BGemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05

279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.

We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.

AI Hallucination Index 2026
Free preview13 of 58 slides
FAQ

Common questions