Qwen3.5 397B A17BvsRing 2.6 1T
Ring 2.6 1T is cheaper than Qwen3.5 397B A17B at $0/M vs $0.6/M input tokens.
| Spec | Qwen3.5 397B A17B | Ring 2.6 1T |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.6/M tokens | Free |
| Output price | $3.6/M tokens | Free |
| Context window | 262K tokens | 262K tokens |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Feb 2026 | May 2026 |
Our Verdict
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Ring 2.6 1T
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, nothing separates them.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Input
$0.60
Output
$3.60
Ring 2.6 1T
Input
$0.000
Output
$0.000
Where to run it
10 hosts, cheapest first
Ring 2.6 1T
No hosts listed on OpenRouter.
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 11 Sep 2026.
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
31%
Qwen3.5 397B A17B uses 3.1x more transitions
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Ring 2.6 1T
54%Vocabulary61%
14wSentence Length21w
0.39Hedging0.32
6.9Bold6.3
4.2Lists2.5
0.23Emoji0.47
0.93Headings0.50
0.17Transitions0.06
Based on 23 + 20 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
Common questions
Keep exploring
More comparisons
Ring 2.6 1T vs Ox AlphaNew provider
Ring 2.6 1T vs GPT-5New provider
Ring 2.6 1T vs MiniMax M3New provider
Ring 2.6 1T vs Llama 4 MaverickNew provider
Ring 2.6 1T vs MiniMax M2New provider
Qwen3.5 397B A17B vs MiniMax M2-herNew provider
Qwen3.5 397B A17B vs MiniMax M2.1New provider
Qwen3.5 397B A17B vs MiniMax M2.5New provider