MiniMax M2.5vsQwen3.5 397B A17B
MiniMax M2.5 is cheaper than Qwen3.5 397B A17B at $0.3/M vs $0.6/M input tokens.
| Spec | MiniMax M2.5 | Qwen3.5 397B A17B |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.3/M tokens | $0.6/M tokens |
| Output price | $1.2/M tokens | $3.6/M tokens |
| Context window | 205K tokens | 262K tokens |
| Released | Feb 2026 | Feb 2026 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 80.2% | 76.4% |
Our Verdict
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
MiniMax M2.5Runner-up
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Qwen3.5 397B A17B has the edge: bigger model tier.
MiniMax M2.5 costs 3.0x less per token.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
MiniMax M2.5
Input
$0.30
2.0× cheaper
Output
$1.20
3.0× cheaper
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Input
$0.60
Output
$3.60
MiniMax M2.5 is cheaper on both — 2.0× input, 3.0× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
52%
Qwen3.5 397B A17B uses 15.6x more emoji
MiniMax M2.5
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
55%Vocabulary54%
25wSentence Length14w
0.58Hedging0.39
6.0Bold6.9
4.4Lists4.2
0.01Emoji0.23
1.11Headings0.93
0.16Transitions0.17
Based on 23 + 23 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
Common questions
Keep exploring
More comparisons
MiniMax M2.5 vs Ox AlphaNew provider
Qwen3.5 397B A17B vs MiniMax M3Cross-provider
MiniMax M2.5 vs GPT-5New provider
MiniMax M2.5 vs Llama 4 MaverickNew provider
MiniMax M2.5 vs Ling 2.6 FlashNew provider
MiniMax M2.5 vs Llama 3 70BNew provider
MiniMax M2.5 vs Llama 3.1 405BNew provider
MiniMax M2.5 vs Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct)New provider