Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
Compare Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B, both from Qwen, context windows of 1.0M vs 1.0M, tested across 53 shared challenges.
Our Verdict
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15
Input
$0.40
5.0× cheaper
Output
$2.40
2.5× cheaper
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
Input
$2.00
Output
$6.00
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 is cheaper on both — 5.0× input, 2.5× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
54%
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 uses 10.0x more emoji
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
54%Vocabulary53%
18wSentence Length18w
0.51Hedging0.83
5.3Bold3.1
2.9Lists4.3
0.10Emoji0.00
0.75Headings1.34
0.09Transitions0.05
Based on 23 + 27 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
