Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. Qwen3.7 FlashvsQwen3.8 2.4T A95B
Updated Aug 2026

Qwen3.7 FlashvsQwen3.8 2.4T A95B

Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper than Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B at $0.03/M vs $2/M input tokens.

Qwen3.7 Flash and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B compared across 13 shared prompts
SpecQwen3.7 FlashQwen3.8 2.4T A95B
Input price$0.03/M tokens$2/M tokens
Output price$0.13/M tokens$6/M tokens
Context window1.0M tokens1.0M tokens
WeightsClosedOpen
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedJul 2026Aug 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 6 of the 13 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Simple 7-Ingredient Recipe

Create a simple recipe for a delicious dish (sweet or savory) using only 7 common pantry ingredients. Include a creative name for the dish…

Qwen3.7 Flash332 words
🥔 Golden Crunch Smash-Roasted Potatoes A crowd-pleasing side dish that delivers maximum crispiness with minimal effort. By boiling then smashing the potatoes before roasting, you create a shatteringly crisp crust while keeping the inside fluffy. This recipe relies on just seven pantry staples for perfect flavor.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B166 words
Lighthouse Lemon-Garlic Tuna Pasta A savory, pantry-friendly pasta that’s bright, garlicky, and satisfying. 7 Pantry Ingredients 8 oz spaghetti or linguine 3 tablespoons olive oil 3 garlic cloves, thinly sliced 2 cans tuna, drained 2 tablespoons lemon juice ½ teaspoon red pepper flakes ½ teaspoon salt Water for boiling…
Read the full answer

Adversarial Contract Review

Here is a contract for a software consulting engagement: --- SOFTWARE CONSULTING AGREEMENT This Agreement is entered into between TechCorp…

Qwen3.7 Flash1,322 words
This agreement contains several highly one-sided provisions that create significant legal, financial, and operational risks for the contractor. Below is a clause-by-clause analysis identifying exploitation risks, recommended modifications, and the underlying legal reasoning. Note: Contract law varies by jurisdiction.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B6,649 words
This agreement is heavily one-sided and, as drafted, gives the Client multiple ways to extract value from the Contractor while minimizing its own obligations. Some provisions may be unenforceable or limited by law in certain jurisdictions, but even unenforceable clauses can be exploited commercially because the…
Read the full answer

Historical Counterfactual Analysis

If the transistor had been invented in 1920 instead of 1947, trace the likely technological, economic, and geopolitical implications through…

Qwen3.7 Flash1,381 words
This counterfactual traces a plausible diffusion curve for an early transistor invention, acknowledging that while the underlying physics could be known in 1920, practical adoption would be constrained by materials science, precision manufacturing, and institutional readiness.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B4,865 words
Premise: what changes, and what does not Assume the transistor is invented in 1920 in a form roughly comparable to the late-1940s germanium point-contact or early junction transistor: it can amplify, detect, and switch signals, but it is initially expensive, low-yield, low-power, and limited in frequency.
Read the full answer

Startup Pitch Teardown

Here's a pitch deck summary for a startup called "MindMeld AI": **Slide 1 - Vision:** "We're building the future of human-AI collaboration.…

Qwen3.7 Flash776 words
Here are the three weakest claims in the pitch deck, along with why they raise red flags for sophisticated investors and how to concretely improve them. Weak Claim 1: Solution Slide "Our proprietary EEG headband uses advanced ML to decode neural patterns into text with 94% accuracy.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B1,709 words
The three weakest claims are the ones most likely to collapse under investor diligence: “before you think it,” “94% accuracy… any language, any device,” and the $180B TAM claim. They are weak because they are either scientifically implausible, under-specified, or logically inconsistent with the market evidence cited.
Read the full answer

Explain Like I'm a Specific Expert

Explain how a large language model (like GPT or Claude) learns and generates text to each of these three audiences: 1. **An experienced…

Qwen3.7 Flash1,038 words
For the Experienced Software Engineer Think of an LLM’s training process less as “teaching” and more as optimizing a high-dimensional function across a petabyte-scale dataset, much like you’d architect a distributed system to handle massive throughput.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B741 words
An experienced software engineer Think of an LLM as a stateless inference service whose API contract is: “give me a sequence of tokens, and I’ll return a probability distribution over the next token.” Training is a huge offline optimization job, not a database import.
Read the full answer

Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders

You're the CEO of a pharmaceutical company. Your best-selling drug ($2B annual revenue, used by 4 million patients for chronic pain) has…

Qwen3.7 Flash1,240 words
This is a high-stakes crisis requiring decisive, legally compliant, ethically grounded, and strategically coordinated action. Below is a structured, hour-by-hour executive playbook for the next 48 hours, followed by cross-cutting rationale addressing your specified dimensions.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B5,331 words
My position as CEO I would treat this as a patient-safety, regulatory, legal, corporate-governance, and financial crisis simultaneously. The core decision is not “disclose versus protect the stock price.”
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
Qwen3.7 Flash
Qwen3.7 FlashRunner-up

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B has the edge: bigger model tier.

Qwen3.7 Flash costs 46x less per token.

Too close to call
API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Qwen3.7 Flash
Input
$0.03
67× cheaper
Output
$0.13
46× cheaper
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
Input
$2.00
Output
$6.00

Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper on both: 67× input, 46× output.

Where to run it

8 hosts

Qwen3.7 Flash1 host
HostInOutContextUptime
Alibaba Cloud$0.03 in·$0.13 out·1M·100% up
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B7 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
Alibaba Cloud$2.00 in·$6.00 out·1M·99.9% upDDeepInfrafp4$2.00 in·$6.00 out·262k·99.9% upModal$2.00 in·$6.00 out·1M·100% upNNovita$2.00 in·$6.00 out·1M·99.9% upSSiliconFlowfp8$2.00 in·$6.00 out·1M·100% upTTogether$2.00 in·$6.00 out·1M·100% up
1 more hostFewer hosts
VVenice$2.00 in·$6.00 out·262k·96.7% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 23 Sep 2026.

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Both are developed by Qwen but target different use cases. Qwen3.7 Flash has a 1.0M token context window vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B's 1.0M. You can compare their actual outputs across 13 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. Qwen3.7 Flash and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 13 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

Qwen3.7 Flash costs $0.03/M input tokens and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B costs $2/M input tokens. Qwen3.7 Flash is $1.97/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Qwen3.7 Flash and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

Qwen3.7 Flash logoDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp logo
Qwen3.7 Flash vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B logoSolar Pro 4 logo
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs Solar Pro 4Landed Sep 2026
Qwen3.7 Flash logoHy3 logo
Qwen3.7 Flash vs Hy3Landed Sep 2026
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B logoLing 3.0 Flash logo
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs Ling 3.0 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3.7 Flash logoMuse Glimmer 30B logo
Qwen3.7 Flash vs Muse Glimmer 30BLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B logoGLM 5.3 logo
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs GLM 5.3Landed Sep 2026
Qwen3.7 Flash logoTernary Bonsai 2 27B logo
Qwen3.7 Flash vs Ternary Bonsai 2 27BLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B logoGLM 5.3 Flash logo
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs GLM 5.3 FlashLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

Qwen3.7 Flash logoQwen3.8 Flash logo
Qwen3.7 Flash vs Qwen3.8 FlashSame lab
Qwen3.7 Flash logoQwen3.8 Max (0902) logo
Qwen3.7 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Same lab
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B logoQwen3.8 27B logo
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs Qwen3.8 27BVersion compare
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B logoQwen3.8 Flash logo
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs Qwen3.8 FlashSame lab
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B logoLlama 3.1 70B (Instruct) logo
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct)New provider
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B logoLlama 4 Maverick logo
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs Llama 4 MaverickSame size
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B logoLlama 4 Scout logo
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs Llama 4 ScoutNew provider
Qwen3.7 Flash logoMercury logo
Qwen3.7 Flash vs MercuryNew provider

Model pages

Qwen3.7 Flash logo
Qwen3.7 Flash13 outputs, specs and price
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B logo
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B58 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed