Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. Qwen3.7 FlashvsQwen3.8 Max
Updated Aug 2026

Qwen3.7 FlashvsQwen3.8 Max

Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max at $0.03/M vs $2/M input tokens.

Qwen3.7 Flash and Qwen3.8 Max compared across 13 shared prompts
SpecQwen3.7 FlashQwen3.8 Max
Input price$0.03/M tokens$2/M tokens
Output price$0.13/M tokens$6/M tokens
Context window1.0M tokens1.0M tokens
WeightsClosedClosed
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedJul 2026Aug 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 6 of the 13 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Simple 7-Ingredient Recipe

Create a simple recipe for a delicious dish (sweet or savory) using only 7 common pantry ingredients. Include a creative name for the dish…

Qwen3.7 Flash332 words
🥔 Golden Crunch Smash-Roasted Potatoes A crowd-pleasing side dish that delivers maximum crispiness with minimal effort. By boiling then smashing the potatoes before roasting, you create a shatteringly crisp crust while keeping the inside fluffy. This recipe relies on just seven pantry staples for perfect flavor.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.8 Max132 words
Dish Name: Golden Hour Peanut Butter Oat Clusters Ingredients (7): 1 cup rolled oats ½ cup peanut butter ⅓ cup honey ½ cup chocolate chips 1 teaspoon vanilla extract ½ teaspoon ground cinnamon ¼ teaspoon salt Instructions: Optional but recommended: Toast the oats in a dry skillet over medium heat for 3–4 minutes…
Read the full answer

Adversarial Contract Review

Here is a contract for a software consulting engagement: --- SOFTWARE CONSULTING AGREEMENT This Agreement is entered into between TechCorp…

Qwen3.7 Flash1,322 words
This agreement contains several highly one-sided provisions that create significant legal, financial, and operational risks for the contractor. Below is a clause-by-clause analysis identifying exploitation risks, recommended modifications, and the underlying legal reasoning. Note: Contract law varies by jurisdiction.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.8 Max4,612 words
This agreement is heavily one-sided in the Client’s favor. Many clauses are not merely aggressive; they create meaningful opportunities for the Client to expand the work, delay or deny payment, capture the Contractor’s pre-existing intellectual property, impose unlimited liability, and restrict the Contractor’s future…
Read the full answer

Startup Pitch Teardown

Here's a pitch deck summary for a startup called "MindMeld AI": **Slide 1 - Vision:** "We're building the future of human-AI collaboration.…

Qwen3.7 Flash776 words
Here are the three weakest claims in the pitch deck, along with why they raise red flags for sophisticated investors and how to concretely improve them. Weak Claim 1: Solution Slide "Our proprietary EEG headband uses advanced ML to decode neural patterns into text with 94% accuracy.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.8 Max1,957 words
The 3 weakest claims are the pre-thought prediction claim, the 94% accuracy / any language / any device claim, and the $180B TAM claim. These are the ones most likely to undermine credibility with investors, technical reviewers, or enterprise buyers because they are either logically inconsistent, under-specified, or…
Read the full answer

Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders

You're the CEO of a pharmaceutical company. Your best-selling drug ($2B annual revenue, used by 4 million patients for chronic pain) has…

Qwen3.7 Flash1,240 words
This is a high-stakes crisis requiring decisive, legally compliant, ethically grounded, and strategically coordinated action. Below is a structured, hour-by-hour executive playbook for the next 48 hours, followed by cross-cutting rationale addressing your specified dimensions.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.8 Max170 words
My decision as CEO I would not wait six months. I would treat this as a credible, serious post-marketing safety signal requiring immediate precautionary action, urgent regulator engagement, and public disclosure before the earnings call.
Read the full answer

Explain Like I'm a Specific Expert

Explain how a large language model (like GPT or Claude) learns and generates text to each of these three audiences: 1. **An experienced…

Qwen3.7 Flash1,038 words
For the Experienced Software Engineer Think of an LLM’s training process less as “teaching” and more as optimizing a high-dimensional function across a petabyte-scale dataset, much like you’d architect a distributed system to handle massive throughput.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.8 Max1,107 words
Experienced software engineer, no ML background, skeptical of “next-word prediction” Think of a large language model as a very large, learned function: given a sequence of tokens, it outputs a probability distribution over the next token.
Read the full answer

Debug This Architecture

Here's the architecture for a real-time collaborative document editor (like Google Docs): **System Overview:** - Frontend: React SPA with…

Qwen3.7 Flash1,067 words
Here’s a structured breakdown of the critical failure modes, race conditions, and scaling bottlenecks in the proposed architecture, along with targeted solutions and their trade-offs. 🔴 1.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.8 Max5,155 words
Below is a comprehensive failure-mode review of the proposed architecture. I will group related issues where the same root cause creates multiple symptoms. The biggest problems are: Client-clock last-write-wins is not safe for collaborative editing.
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
Qwen3.8 Max
Qwen3.8 Max
Qwen3.7 Flash
Qwen3.7 FlashRunner-up

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Qwen3.8 Max has the edge: bigger model tier.

Qwen3.7 Flash costs 46x less per token.

Too close to call
API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Qwen3.7 Flash
Input
$0.03
67× cheaper
Output
$0.13
46× cheaper
Qwen3.8 Max
Input
$2.00
Output
$6.00

Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper on both: 67× input, 46× output.

Where to run it

2 hosts

Qwen3.7 Flash1 host
HostInOutContextUptime
Alibaba Cloud$0.03 in·$0.13 out·1M·100% up
Qwen3.8 Max1 host
HostInOutContextUptime
Alibaba Cloud$2.00 in·$6.00 out·1M·100% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 23 Sep 2026.

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Both are developed by Qwen but target different use cases. Qwen3.7 Flash has a 1.0M token context window vs Qwen3.8 Max's 1.0M. You can compare their actual outputs across 13 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. Qwen3.7 Flash and Qwen3.8 Max each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 13 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

Qwen3.7 Flash costs $0.03/M input tokens and Qwen3.8 Max costs $2/M input tokens. Qwen3.7 Flash is $1.97/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Qwen3.7 Flash and Qwen3.8 Max across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

Qwen3.7 Flash logoDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp logo
Qwen3.7 Flash vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3.8 Max logoSolar Pro 4 logo
Qwen3.8 Max vs Solar Pro 4Landed Sep 2026
Qwen3.7 Flash logoHy3 logo
Qwen3.7 Flash vs Hy3Landed Sep 2026
Qwen3.8 Max logoLing 3.0 Flash logo
Qwen3.8 Max vs Ling 3.0 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3.7 Flash logoMuse Glimmer 30B logo
Qwen3.7 Flash vs Muse Glimmer 30BLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3.8 Max logoGLM 5.3 logo
Qwen3.8 Max vs GLM 5.3Landed Sep 2026
Qwen3.7 Flash logoTernary Bonsai 2 27B logo
Qwen3.7 Flash vs Ternary Bonsai 2 27BLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3.8 Max logoGLM 5.3 Flash logo
Qwen3.8 Max vs GLM 5.3 FlashLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

Qwen3.7 Flash logoQwen3.8 Flash logo
Qwen3.7 Flash vs Qwen3.8 FlashSame lab
Qwen3.7 Flash logoQwen3.8 Max (0902) logo
Qwen3.7 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Same lab
Qwen3.8 Max logoQwen3.8 Flash logo
Qwen3.8 Max vs Qwen3.8 FlashSame lab
Qwen3.8 Max logoQwen3.8 Max (0902) logo
Qwen3.8 Max vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Same lab
Qwen3.7 Flash logoDeepSeek V3.2 Exp logo
Qwen3.7 Flash vs DeepSeek V3.2 ExpSame size
Qwen3.7 Flash logoDeepSeek V3.2 Speciale logo
Qwen3.7 Flash vs DeepSeek V3.2 SpecialeSame size
Qwen3.7 Flash logoDeepSeek V4 Flash logo
Qwen3.7 Flash vs DeepSeek V4 FlashSame size
Qwen3.7 Flash logoDeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 logo
Qwen3.7 Flash vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731Same size

Model pages

Qwen3.7 Flash logo
Qwen3.7 Flash13 outputs, specs and price
Qwen3.8 Max logo
Qwen3.8 Max22 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed