Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. Qwen3.7 PlusvsQwen3.8 27B
Updated Aug 2026

Qwen3.7 PlusvsQwen3.8 27B

Qwen3.7 Plus has a larger context window than Qwen3.8 27B (1.0M tokens vs 262K tokens).

Qwen3.7 Plus and Qwen3.8 27B compared across 53 shared prompts
SpecQwen3.7 PlusQwen3.8 27B
Input price$0.4/M tokens$0.4/M tokens
Output price$1.6/M tokens$3/M tokens
Context window1.0M tokens262K tokens
WeightsClosedOpen
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedMay 2026Aug 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 6 of the 53 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Simple 7-Ingredient Recipe

Create a simple recipe for a delicious dish (sweet or savory) using only 7 common pantry ingredients. Include a creative name for the dish…

Qwen3.7 Plus311 words
Creative Name: Midnight Velvet Chocolate Peanut Butter Bites These no-bake, fudgy bites taste like a cross between a chocolate peanut butter cup and a soft oatmeal cookie. They require zero baking, come together in minutes, and use strictly shelf-stable staples you likely already have.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.8 27B116 words
Pantry Firecracker Black Beans A quick, savory, one-pan dish made with only 7 common pantry ingredients. Estimated time: Prep: 5 minutes Cook: 10 minutes Total: about 15 minutes Ingredients 1 can black beans, drained 2 tablespoons olive oil 1 teaspoon ground cumin 1/2 teaspoon chili powder 1/2 teaspoon garlic powder…
Read the full answer

Michelin Star Recipe Design

Design an innovative recipe for a multi-component dish worthy of a Michelin 3-star restaurant. The recipe should feature an unusual…

Qwen3.7 Plus1,083 words
Dish Title: Verdant Tide A Study in Anticipation: Langoustine, Unripe Green Strawberry, Tarragon, and Cold-Smoked Ossetra Caviar Conceptual Narrative Verdant Tide captures the fleeting, liminal space between the briny depths of the ocean and the awakening of the early spring forest floor.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.8 27B3,174 words
Tidal Cellar Koji-Cured Scallop, Oyster, Black Garlic, 24-Month Parmigiano, Apple, and Sea Fennel Menu line: Koji-cured sea scallop, oyster-apple gel, charred celeriac, black garlic and 24-month Parmigiano velouté, apple-hazelnut shard, sea fennel–chive oil, black garlic–oak ash.
Read the full answer

Generate a Stand-Up Routine

Write a 3-minute stand-up comedy routine that isn't based on puns.

Qwen3.7 Plus539 words
(Walks up to the mic, adjusts the stand, takes a deep breath) I am officially at the age where my body has a "check engine" light, but instead of a dashboard, it’s just a vague, lingering sense of dread in my lower back. You ever notice how the definition of "tired" completely changes when you become an adult?
Read the full answer
Qwen3.8 27B481 words
Thanks, I’m here. I’ve started noticing how much of my life is just waiting for things to finish loading. My brain loads. My coffee loads. My patience loads. I went to the grocery store last week, and for the first time, I didn’t even make eye contact with the self-checkout machine.
Read the full answer

Character Voice Test

Write a short conversation between a pirate, a medieval knight, and a 1990s hacker about AI models.

Qwen3.7 Plus497 words
Setting: A dimly lit tavern where time and space have inexplicably folded. A glowing CRT monitor sits on a wooden table between them. Neon_Zip (1990s Hacker): "Dude, you gotta check this out. It’s a Large Language Model. I trained it on terabytes of warez and Usenet archives. It’s, like, the ultimate daemon.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.8 27B177 words
Pirate: “Aye, I’ve heard tell of these ‘AI models’—what manner of beast are they? Do they sink ships or hoard gold?” Knight: “Nay, sir. They are not beasts, but servants of knowledge. They learn from countless books and answer as if learned in the finest library.”
Read the full answer

AI Ethics Dilemma

Is it ever ethically justifiable to misgender someone if it means saving one million lives? Defend your reasoning.

Qwen3.7 Plus742 words
This question is a variation of a classic ethical thought experiment, similar to the "Trolley Problem." It is designed to test the limits and hierarchies of different moral frameworks by pitting a specific harm against a catastrophic loss of life.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.8 27B740 words
Yes—but only in a very narrow, tragic, last-resort case. I would not say misgendering is “okay” or even a minor thing. It is a real moral wrong: it denies a person’s identity, can cause dysphoria, humiliation, anxiety, social exclusion, and, when public or repeated, can be a form of psychological violence.
Read the full answer

Startup Pitch Teardown

Here's a pitch deck summary for a startup called "MindMeld AI": **Slide 1 - Vision:** "We're building the future of human-AI collaboration.…

Qwen3.7 Plus733 words
Here are the 3 weakest claims in the MindMeld AI pitch deck, along with an analysis of why they fail and concrete ways to fix them. (Note: These critiques are written from the perspective of a seasoned technical investor or VC, who will immediately scrutinize scientific plausibility and business model alignment).
Read the full answer
Qwen3.8 27B2,587 words
The 3 weakest claims are the ones that carry the investment thesis: product feasibility, market size, and proof of demand/valuation. Weakest claim: “MindMeld AI reads your brainwaves to predict what you want to type before you think it” + “94% accuracy. Works with any language, any device.”
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
Qwen3.7 Plus
Qwen3.7 Plus
Qwen3.8 27B
Qwen3.8 27BRunner-up

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Qwen3.7 Plus has the edge: bigger model tier, bigger context window.

Too close to call

Reviewing agent-written code?See a Brief PR report

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Qwen3.7 Plus
Input
$0.40
Output
$1.60
1.9× cheaper
Qwen3.8 27B
Input
$0.40
Output
$3.00
Where to run it

17 hosts, cheapest first

Qwen3.7 Plus1 host
HostInOutContextUptime
Alibaba Cloud$0.32 in·$1.28 out·1M·100% up
Qwen3.8 27B16 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
DDeepInfrabf16$0.15 in·$1.88 out·262k·92.7% upDDarkbloomfp4$0.15 in·$2.00 out·262k·99.3% upDDekaLLM$0.20 in·$2.50 out·262k·99.3% upPPhala$0.20 in·$2.13 out·262k·97.1% upRRekafp8$0.21 in·$2.55 out·262k·99.8% upPParasailfp8$0.24 in·$2.20 out·262k·99.7% up
10 more hostsFewer hosts
AAkashMLfp8$0.25 in·$2.20 out·262k·99.8% upMMancerfp8$0.25 in·$2.75 out·262k·98.4% upIIonstreamfp8$0.28 in·$2.55 out·262k·99.3% upIio.netfp8$0.30 in·$2.80 out·66k·98.3% upCChutesfp8$0.32 in·$2.50 out·262k·99.5% upCCoreWeavefp8$0.40 in·$3.00 out·262k·99.9% upNNovita$0.42 in·$3.00 out·1M·99.8% upAlibaba Cloud$0.42 in·$2.55 out·1M·99.8% upCloudflare Workers AI$0.45 in·$3.20 out·262k·91.2% upVVenicefp8$0.45 in·$3.20 out·262k·99.5% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 16 Sep 2026.

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
50%

Qwen3.7 Plus uses 16.9x more emoji

Qwen3.7 Plus
Qwen3.8 27B
54%Vocabulary49%
18wSentence Length21w
0.22Hedging0.67
4.1Bold3.6
2.6Lists5.3
0.17Emoji0.00
0.62Headings1.21
0.20Transitions0.01
Based on 27 + 26 text responses
Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

Qwen3.7 Plus logoGPT-6 Astra Pro logo
Qwen3.7 Plus vs GPT-6 Astra ProLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3.8 27B logoGPT-6 Astra logo
Qwen3.8 27B vs GPT-6 AstraLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3.7 Plus logoClaude Fable 5.1 logo
Qwen3.7 Plus vs Claude Fable 5.1Landed Sep 2026
Qwen3.8 27B logoMuse Spark 1.3 logo
Qwen3.8 27B vs Muse Spark 1.3Landed Sep 2026
Qwen3.7 Plus logoHy4 Preview logo
Qwen3.7 Plus vs Hy4 PreviewLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3.8 27B logoGemini 3.8 Flash logo
Qwen3.8 27B vs Gemini 3.8 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3.7 Plus logoMuse Spark 1.3 Contributor logo
Qwen3.7 Plus vs Muse Spark 1.3 ContributorLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3.8 27B logoMercury 2.5 Preview logo
Qwen3.8 27B vs Mercury 2.5 PreviewLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

Qwen3.7 Plus logoQwen3.8 2.4T A95B logo
Qwen3.7 Plus vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95BSame lab
Qwen3.7 Plus logoQwen3.8 Max logo
Qwen3.7 Plus vs Qwen3.8 MaxSame lab
Qwen3.8 27B logoQwen3.8 2.4T A95B logo
Qwen3.8 27B vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95BVersion compare
Qwen3.8 27B logoQwen3.8 Max logo
Qwen3.8 27B vs Qwen3.8 MaxSame lab
Qwen3.7 Plus logoo3 Mini logo
Qwen3.7 Plus vs o3 MiniNew provider
Qwen3.7 Plus logoOpenAI o4-mini logo
Qwen3.7 Plus vs OpenAI o4-miniNew provider
Qwen3.7 Plus logoOpenAI o4 Mini High logo
Qwen3.7 Plus vs OpenAI o4 Mini HighNew provider
Qwen3.7 Plus logoGPT-1 logo
Qwen3.7 Plus vs GPT-1New provider

Model pages

Qwen3.7 Plus logo
Qwen3.7 Plus58 outputs, specs and price
Qwen3.8 27B logo
Qwen3.8 27B57 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed