Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. Qwen3.8 2.4T A95BvsQwen3.8 Max
Updated Aug 2026

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95BvsQwen3.8 Max

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B has a larger context window than Qwen3.8 Max (1.0M tokens vs 1.0M tokens).

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B and Qwen3.8 Max compared across 21 shared prompts
SpecQwen3.8 2.4T A95BQwen3.8 Max
Input price$2/M tokens$2/M tokens
Output price$6/M tokens$6/M tokens
Context window1.0M tokens1.0M tokens
WeightsOpenClosed
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedAug 2026Aug 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 6 of the 21 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Simple 7-Ingredient Recipe

Create a simple recipe for a delicious dish (sweet or savory) using only 7 common pantry ingredients. Include a creative name for the dish…

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B166 words
Lighthouse Lemon-Garlic Tuna Pasta A savory, pantry-friendly pasta that’s bright, garlicky, and satisfying. 7 Pantry Ingredients 8 oz spaghetti or linguine 3 tablespoons olive oil 3 garlic cloves, thinly sliced 2 cans tuna, drained 2 tablespoons lemon juice ½ teaspoon red pepper flakes ½ teaspoon salt Water for boiling…
Read the full answer
Qwen3.8 Max132 words
Dish Name: Golden Hour Peanut Butter Oat Clusters Ingredients (7): 1 cup rolled oats ½ cup peanut butter ⅓ cup honey ½ cup chocolate chips 1 teaspoon vanilla extract ½ teaspoon ground cinnamon ¼ teaspoon salt Instructions: Optional but recommended: Toast the oats in a dry skillet over medium heat for 3–4 minutes…
Read the full answer

Adversarial Contract Review

Here is a contract for a software consulting engagement: --- SOFTWARE CONSULTING AGREEMENT This Agreement is entered into between TechCorp…

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B6,649 words
This agreement is heavily one-sided and, as drafted, gives the Client multiple ways to extract value from the Contractor while minimizing its own obligations. Some provisions may be unenforceable or limited by law in certain jurisdictions, but even unenforceable clauses can be exploited commercially because the…
Read the full answer
Qwen3.8 Max4,612 words
This agreement is heavily one-sided in the Client’s favor. Many clauses are not merely aggressive; they create meaningful opportunities for the Client to expand the work, delay or deny payment, capture the Contractor’s pre-existing intellectual property, impose unlimited liability, and restrict the Contractor’s future…
Read the full answer

Mini LBO Underwrite

You are underwriting a 5-year LBO for a private equity investment committee. Company (fictional): HarborTech Services (HTS) –…

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B892 words
Entry capitalization All figures in $m unless noted. FY2025 EBITDA = $120.0 Entry EV = 12.0x × $120.0 = $1,440.0 Transaction fees = 2.0% × $1,440.0 = $28.8 Term Loan = 4.0x × $120.0 = $480.0 Mezzanine = 1.5x × $120.0 = $180.0 Equity = EV + fees – debt = $1,440.0 + $28.8 – $660.0 = $808.8 Sources & Uses Uses $m Sources…
Read the full answer
Qwen3.8 Max828 words
Base-case underwriting (FY2026–FY2030) Assumptions / conventions used All amounts in $m unless noted. Close occurs at end of FY2025; FY2026 is Year 1. Interest is calculated on beginning-of-year debt balances; optional Term Loan paydown occurs at year-end. Term Loan amortization: 1.0% of original $480m TL = $4.8m/yr.
Read the full answer

Historical Counterfactual Analysis

If the transistor had been invented in 1920 instead of 1947, trace the likely technological, economic, and geopolitical implications through…

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B4,865 words
Premise: what changes, and what does not Assume the transistor is invented in 1920 in a form roughly comparable to the late-1940s germanium point-contact or early junction transistor: it can amplify, detect, and switch signals, but it is initially expensive, low-yield, low-power, and limited in frequency.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.8 Max4,497 words
A useful way to think about this is not “1980 becomes 2007.” The transistor would accelerate electronics, but every technology has bottlenecks: materials chemistry, precision manufacturing, rockets, batteries, displays, institutional capacity, and war.
Read the full answer

Michelin Star Recipe Design

Design an innovative recipe for a multi-component dish worthy of a Michelin 3-star restaurant. The recipe should feature an unusual…

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B2,994 words
Cliff Nest Koji-Aged Squab, Sea Urchin, Rhubarb, Black Garlic Yield: 4 tasting portions Style: Contemporary fine-dining main course Key unusual pairing: Koji-aged pigeon/squab with sea urchin, bridged by rhubarb acidity and black-garlic depth Conceptual Narrative Cliff Nest imagines a coastal nesting site in early…
Read the full answer
Qwen3.8 Max2,887 words
First Light Diver Scallop, Bone Marrow, Green Strawberry, and Chamomile A multi-component savory dish designed around contrast: sea sweetness, land richness, unripe-fruit acidity, and floral aromatics.
Read the full answer

Debug This Architecture

Here's the architecture for a real-time collaborative document editor (like Google Docs): **System Overview:** - Frontend: React SPA with…

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B3,715 words
The architecture as written has several P0 correctness problems that can cause lost edits, divergent documents, and security/staleness issues, plus scaling bottlenecks that get worse as you add more API servers. Below is a detailed failure-mode review, grouped by category.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.8 Max5,155 words
Below is a comprehensive failure-mode review of the proposed architecture. I will group related issues where the same root cause creates multiple symptoms. The biggest problems are: Client-clock last-write-wins is not safe for collaborative editing.
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
Qwen3.8 Max
Qwen3.8 Max

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, nothing separates them.

Too close to call

Reviewing agent-written code?See a Brief PR report

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
Input
$2.00
Output
$6.00
Qwen3.8 Max
Input
$2.00
Output
$6.00
Where to run it

8 hosts

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B7 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
Alibaba Cloud$2.00 in·$6.00 out·1M·100% upDDeepInfrafp4$2.00 in·$6.00 out·262k·98.9% upModal$2.00 in·$6.00 out·1M·99.9% upNNovita$2.00 in·$6.00 out·1M·99.9% upSSiliconFlowfp8$2.00 in·$6.00 out·1M·97.7% upTTogether$2.00 in·$6.00 out·1M·98.3% up
1 more hostFewer hosts
VVenice$2.00 in·$6.00 out·262k·92.6% up
Qwen3.8 Max1 host
HostInOutContextUptime
Alibaba Cloud$2.00 in·$6.00 out·1M·100% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 16 Sep 2026.

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
86%

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B uses 2.3x more transitions

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
Qwen3.8 Max
53%Vocabulary48%
18wSentence Length17w
0.83Hedging0.95
3.1Bold4.3
4.3Lists8.2
0.00Emoji0.00
1.34Headings1.92
0.05Transitions0.02
Based on 27 + 13 text responses
Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B logoGPT-6 Astra Pro logo
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs GPT-6 Astra ProLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3.8 Max logoGPT-6 Astra logo
Qwen3.8 Max vs GPT-6 AstraLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B logoClaude Fable 5.1 logo
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs Claude Fable 5.1Landed Sep 2026
Qwen3.8 Max logoMuse Spark 1.3 logo
Qwen3.8 Max vs Muse Spark 1.3Landed Sep 2026
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B logoHy4 Preview logo
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs Hy4 PreviewLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3.8 Max logoGemini 3.8 Flash logo
Qwen3.8 Max vs Gemini 3.8 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B logoMuse Spark 1.3 Contributor logo
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs Muse Spark 1.3 ContributorLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3.8 Max logoMercury 2.5 Preview logo
Qwen3.8 Max vs Mercury 2.5 PreviewLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B logoQwen3.8 27B logo
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs Qwen3.8 27BVersion compare
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B logoQwen3.7 Plus logo
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs Qwen3.7 PlusSame lab
Qwen3.8 Max logoQwen3.8 27B logo
Qwen3.8 Max vs Qwen3.8 27BSame lab
Qwen3.8 Max logoQwen3.7 Plus logo
Qwen3.8 Max vs Qwen3.7 PlusSame lab
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B logoGemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 logo
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05Same size
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B logoGemini 3 Flash Preview logo
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs Gemini 3 Flash PreviewNew provider
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B logoGemini 3 Pro Preview logo
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs Gemini 3 Pro PreviewSame size
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B logoGemini 3.1 Flash Lite logo
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs Gemini 3.1 Flash LiteNew provider

Model pages

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B logo
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B58 outputs, specs and price
Qwen3.8 Max logo
Qwen3.8 Max22 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed