What is the difference between Claude Fable 5.1 and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B?

Claude Fable 5.1 is developed by Anthropic while Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is developed by Qwen. Claude Fable 5.1 has a 1.0M token context window vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B's 1.0M. You can compare their actual outputs across 10 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, Claude Fable 5.1 or Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B?

It depends on your use case. Claude Fable 5.1 and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 10 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does Claude Fable 5.1 cost compared to Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B?

Claude Fable 5.1 costs $10/M input tokens and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B costs $2/M input tokens. Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is $8.00/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare Claude Fable 5.1 and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Claude Fable 5.1 and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Updated Sep 2026

Claude Fable 5.1vsQwen3.8 2.4T A95B

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is cheaper than Claude Fable 5.1 at $2/M vs $10/M input tokens.

Claude Fable 5.1 and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B compared across 10 shared prompts
Spec	Claude Fable 5.1	Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
Input price	$10/M tokens	$2/M tokens
Output price	$50/M tokens	$6/M tokens
Context window	1.0M tokens	1.0M tokens
Weights	Closed	Open
Free API (OpenRouter)	No	No
Released	Sep 2026	Aug 2026

Our Verdict

Claude Fable 5.1

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, nothing separates them.

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B costs 8.3x less per token.

Too close to call

Reviewing agent-written code?See a Brief PR report

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Claude Fable 5.1

Input

$10.00

Output

$50.00

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B

Input

$2.00

5.0× cheaper

Output

$6.00

8.3× cheaper

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is cheaper on both: 5.0× input, 8.3× output.

Where to run it

11 hosts

Claude Fable 5.14 hosts

HostInOutContextUptime

Amazon Bedrock$10.00 in$50.00 out1M—Anthropic$10.00 in$50.00 out1M99.1% up Azure AI Foundry$10.00 in$50.00 out1M99.1% up Google Vertex AI$10.00 in$50.00 out1M99.8% up

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B7 hosts

HostInOutContextUptime

Alibaba Cloud$2.00 in$6.00 out1M100% up DeepInfrafp4$2.00 in$6.00 out262k98.9% up Modal$2.00 in$6.00 out1M99.9% up Novita$2.00 in$6.00 out1M99.9% up SiliconFlowfp8$2.00 in$6.00 out1M97.7% up Together$2.00 in$6.00 out1M98.3% up

1 more host

Venice$2.00 in$6.00 out262k92.6% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 16 Sep 2026.

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Cost per 1M tokens

11 hosts

What we learned reading every model

Common questions

What is the difference between Claude Fable 5.1 and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B?

Which is better, Claude Fable 5.1 or Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B?

How much does Claude Fable 5.1 cost compared to Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B?

How can I compare Claude Fable 5.1 and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B on Rival?

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

Same lab, same size, long tail

Model pages

Cost per 1M tokens

11 hosts

What we learned reading every model

Common questions

What is the difference between Claude Fable 5.1 and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B?

Which is better, Claude Fable 5.1 or Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B?

How much does Claude Fable 5.1 cost compared to Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B?

How can I compare Claude Fable 5.1 and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B on Rival?

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

Same lab, same size, long tail

Model pages