Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. Qwen3.8 27BvsQwen3.8 Max (0902)
Updated Sep 2026

Qwen3.8 27BvsQwen3.8 Max (0902)

Qwen3.8 27B is cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max (0902) at $0.4/M vs $2/M input tokens.

Qwen3.8 27B and Qwen3.8 Max (0902) compared across 10 shared prompts
SpecQwen3.8 27BQwen3.8 Max (0902)
Input price$0.4/M tokens$2/M tokens
Output price$3/M tokens$6/M tokens
Context window262K tokens1.0M tokens
WeightsOpenClosed
Free API (OpenRouter)Yes (1 provider)No
ReleasedAug 2026Sep 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 5 of the 10 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Simple 7-Ingredient Recipe

Create a simple recipe for a delicious dish (sweet or savory) using only 7 common pantry ingredients. Include a creative name for the dish…

Qwen3.8 27B116 words
Pantry Firecracker Black Beans A quick, savory, one-pan dish made with only 7 common pantry ingredients. Estimated time: Prep: 5 minutes Cook: 10 minutes Total: about 15 minutes Ingredients 1 can black beans, drained 2 tablespoons olive oil 1 teaspoon ground cumin 1/2 teaspoon chili powder 1/2 teaspoon garlic powder…
Read the full answer
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)230 words
🍯 Midnight Crispy Chickpea Bowl A sweet-savory, crispy rice bowl that comes together faster than delivery. Ingredients (7) # Ingredient Amount 1 Canned chickpeas (drained & patted dry) 1 can (15 oz) 2 Soy sauce 3 tbsp 3 Honey 2 tbsp 4 Garlic (minced) 3 cloves 5 Vegetable oil 2 tbsp 6 Instant or leftover cooked rice 2…
Read the full answer

Debug This Architecture

Here's the architecture for a real-time collaborative document editor (like Google Docs): **System Overview:** - Frontend: React SPA with…

Qwen3.8 27B4,268 words
Below is a comprehensive issue register based on the architecture you described. I’m assuming: “change event” can be a small edit, possibly per keystroke or per paragraph. Documents are stored as HTML blobs. Each API server owns only its own WebSocket clients.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)477 words
Architecture Failure Analysis: Real-Time Collaborative Editor Critical Issues (Data Loss / Correctness) Last-Write-Wins with Client Clocks — Fundamental Data Loss Problem: Client clocks are unreliable. They drift, can be manually set, and differ across timezones.
Read the full answer

Beginner's Longevity Plan

Outline a simple, actionable 1-month plan for someone starting their journey towards better health and longevity. Focus on 3 key areas…

Qwen3.8 27B936 words
Here’s a simple, beginner-friendly 1-month plan focused on 3 key areas: movement, food, and sleep/stress. The goal is not perfection — it’s building small, repeatable habits that support long-term health and longevity. Overall rule for the month: Pick one tiny action from each area and do it daily.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)536 words
The 30-Day Foundation Plan Core principle: Don't overhaul your life. Layer small wins that compound. 🏃 Area 1: Movement The goal isn't fitness. It's making your body a place you want to live in. Week 1 — Build the trigger Walk 15 minutes daily (same time each day to build the habit) No gym. No gear.
Read the full answer

Startup Pitch Teardown

Here's a pitch deck summary for a startup called "MindMeld AI": **Slide 1 - Vision:** "We're building the future of human-AI collaboration.…

Qwen3.8 27B2,587 words
The 3 weakest claims are the ones that carry the investment thesis: product feasibility, market size, and proof of demand/valuation. Weakest claim: “MindMeld AI reads your brainwaves to predict what you want to type before you think it” + “94% accuracy. Works with any language, any device.”
Read the full answer
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)582 words
The 3 Weakest Claims in the MindMeld AI Pitch The TAM Claim: "$180B" (Slide 4) Why it's weak: This is a textbook case of TAM inflation that immediately undermines credibility with any experienced investor.
Read the full answer

Explain Like I'm a Specific Expert

Explain how a large language model (like GPT or Claude) learns and generates text to each of these three audiences: 1. **An experienced…

Qwen3.8 27B1,144 words
For an experienced software engineer Think of a large language model as a stateless inference service plus an enormous offline training pipeline. At inference time, the model takes a prompt, converts it into tokens, and produces a probability distribution over the next token.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)1,046 words
For the Experienced Software Engineer Think of an LLM as a lossy compression function trained on a massive corpus. During training, you're essentially building a statistical model of "given this sequence of tokens, what's the probability distribution over the next token?"
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Qwen3.8 27B
Qwen3.8 27BRunner-up

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Qwen3.8 Max (0902) has the edge: bigger model tier, bigger context window.

Too close to call
API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Qwen3.8 27B
Input
$0.40
5.0× cheaper
Output
$3.00
2.0× cheaper
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Input
$2.00
Output
$6.00

Qwen3.8 27B is cheaper on both: 5.0× input, 2.0× output.

Where to run it

17 hosts, cheapest first

Qwen3.8 27B16 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
DDarkbloomfp4$0.10 in·$1.80 out·262k·98.9% upRRekafp8$0.12 in·$2.48 out·262k·99.9% upDDekaLLM$0.12 in·$2.50 out·262k·99.7% upWWafer$0.12 in·$2.50 out·262k·99.9% upPPhala$0.20 in·$2.08 out·262k·97.9% upMMancerfp8$0.20 in·$2.50 out·262k·99.8% up
10 more hostsFewer hosts
CChutesfp8$0.24 in·$2.20 out·262k·99.3% upPParasailfp8$0.24 in·$2.20 out·262k·100% upAAkashMLfp8$0.25 in·$2.20 out·262k·100% upIIonstreamfp8$0.28 in·$2.55 out·262k·98% upCCoreWeavefp8$0.40 in·$3.00 out·262k·99.5% upNNovita$0.42 in·$3.00 out·1M·99.9% upAlibaba Cloud$0.42 in·$2.55 out·1M·99.9% upVVenicefp8$0.45 in·$3.20 out·262k·97.2% upDDeepInfrabf16degraded$0.15 in·$1.88 out·262k·97.8% upCloudflare Workers AIdegraded$0.45 in·$3.20 out·262k·90.8% up
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)1 host
HostInOutContextUptime
Alibaba Cloud$2.00 in·$6.00 out·1M·100% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 22 Sep 2026.

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Both are developed by Qwen but target different use cases. Qwen3.8 27B has a 262K token context window vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)'s 1.0M. You can compare their actual outputs across 10 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. Qwen3.8 27B and Qwen3.8 Max (0902) each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 10 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

Qwen3.8 27B costs $0.4/M input tokens and Qwen3.8 Max (0902) costs $2/M input tokens. Qwen3.8 27B is $1.60/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Qwen3.8 27B and Qwen3.8 Max (0902) across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

Qwen3.8 27B logoDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp logo
Qwen3.8 27B vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) logoSolar Pro 4 logo
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Solar Pro 4Landed Sep 2026
Qwen3.8 27B logoHy3 logo
Qwen3.8 27B vs Hy3Landed Sep 2026
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) logoQwen3.7 Flash logo
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Qwen3.7 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3.8 27B logoLing 3.0 Flash logo
Qwen3.8 27B vs Ling 3.0 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) logoMuse Glimmer 30B logo
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Muse Glimmer 30BLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3.8 27B logoGLM 5.3 logo
Qwen3.8 27B vs GLM 5.3Landed Sep 2026
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) logoTernary Bonsai 2 27B logo
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Ternary Bonsai 2 27BLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

Qwen3.8 27B logoQwen3.8 2.4T A95B logo
Qwen3.8 27B vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95BVersion compare
Qwen3.8 27B logoQwen3.7 Flash logo
Qwen3.8 27B vs Qwen3.7 FlashSame lab
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) logoQwen3.8 Flash logo
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Qwen3.8 FlashSame lab
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) logoQwen3.8 2.4T A95B logo
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95BSame lab
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) logoMistral Devstral Small 1.1 logo
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Mistral Devstral Small 1.1New provider
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) logoDots3-Note Preview logo
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Dots3-Note PreviewSame size
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) logoElephant Alpha logo
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Elephant AlphaSame size
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) logoERNIE 4.5 300B A47B logo
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs ERNIE 4.5 300B A47BNew provider

Model pages

Qwen3.8 27B logo
Qwen3.8 27B57 outputs, specs and price
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) logo
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)10 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed