Skip to content
Rival
Models
CompareBest ForArena
Sign Up
Sign Up

Compare AI vibes, not scores. Side-by-side outputs across the world's best models.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Leaderboard
  • Challenges

Discover

  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • .llmignore
  • Badges
  • RIVAL Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival
Rival
Models
CompareBest ForArena
Sign Up
Sign Up

Compare AI vibes, not scores. Side-by-side outputs across the world's best models.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Leaderboard
  • Challenges

Discover

  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • .llmignore
  • Badges
  • RIVAL Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival
  1. Home
  2. Models
  3. Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet
  4. Debug This Architecture

See how Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet compares on this challenge:

  • Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet vs Claude Sonnet 4.6
  • Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
  • Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet vs Z.ai: GLM 5

4 models have responded to the "Debug This Architecture" challenge. Compare their approaches side-by-side on RIVAL. This response is part of RIVAL's open dataset of 5,600+ AI model responses.

Rival
Models
CompareBest ForArena
Sign Up
Sign Up
Back to Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet

Debug This Architecture

Claude 3 7 Sonnet Thinking's response to the 'Debug This Architecture' challenge.

Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet
February 3, 2026
Text

?
Prompt

Here's the architecture for a real-time collaborative document editor (like Google Docs): **System Overview:** - Frontend: React SPA with WebSocket connections - Backend: Node.js API servers behind a load balancer (round-robin) - Database: PostgreSQL for document storage, Redis for session cache - Real-time: Each API server maintains its own WebSocket connections to clients - Sync Strategy: Last-write-wins with timestamps from client clocks - Storage: Documents saved as full HTML snapshots every 30 seconds - Auth: JWT tokens with 24-hour expiry, stored in localStorage - CDN: CloudFront for static assets, also caches API responses for 5 minutes **Data Flow:** 1. User types → change event sent via WebSocket to their connected server 2. Server writes change to PostgreSQL 3. Server broadcasts change to all WebSocket clients connected to THAT server 4. Other servers poll PostgreSQL every 2 seconds for changes 5. Conflict resolution: if two users edit the same paragraph, last timestamp wins **Scaling Plan:** - Horizontal scaling by adding more API servers - Database read replicas for read-heavy operations - Document partitioning by organization ID Identify all potential failure modes, race conditions, and scaling bottlenecks in this architecture. For each issue found, propose a specific solution with trade-offs.

Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet
Response

claude-3.7-sonnet-thinking logo
Claude 3.7 Thinking SonnetDebug This Architecture
claude-3.7-sonnet-thinking logo
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet

Collaborative Document Editor: Architecture Review

Failure Modes Analysis

1. WebSocket Connection Failures

Issue: Client connections can fail due to network issues or server restarts, causing lost updates. Solution: Implement automatic reconnection with change buffering

  • Store pending changes in client memory with periodic localStorage backups
  • Implement exponential backoff for reconnection attempts
  • Add offline mode indicators and sync status UI
  • Maintain client session context to resume collaboration properly

Trade-offs: Increases client-side complexity; potential for complex conflict resolution when reconnecting after extended offline periods

2. Single-Server Communication Silo

Issue: Changes only broadcast to clients connected to the same server Solution: Replace polling with a proper pub/sub system

  • Implement Redis pub/sub channels for cross-server communication
  • Each server publishes changes to a common channel and subscribes to receive others
  • Eliminates the 2-second polling delay and reduces database load

Trade-offs: Adds Redis as another critical component; requires handling Redis outages

3. Database Single Point of Failure

Issue: If PostgreSQL fails, the entire system becomes unusable Solution: Implement multi-level persistence strategy

  • Primary/replica configuration with automatic failover
  • Write-ahead log in memory or separate queue before database commit
  • Circuit breakers to gracefully degrade functionality during database issues
  • Consider separating read and write paths with CQRS pattern

Trade-offs: Significantly increases operational complexity; eventual consistency challenges

Race Conditions

1. Client Clock Timestamps

Issue: Using client clocks for conflict resolution is unreliable Solution: Implement proper distributed sequence tracking

  • Replace client timestamps with Lamport timestamps or vector clocks
  • Consider full Operational Transformation (OT) or Conflict-free Replicated Data Types (CRDTs)
  • Server-assigned sequence numbers for total ordering of operations

Trade-offs: OT/CRDTs introduce significant implementation complexity; requires more metadata with each change

2. Coarse-grained Conflict Resolution

Issue: Paragraph-level "last-write-wins" causes data loss during concurrent edits Solution: Implement finer-grained conflict resolution

  • Character-level operations rather than paragraph-level
  • Use differential synchronization or OT for merging concurrent edits
  • Separate structure from content in the document model

Trade-offs: Increases computational overhead; more complex data model

3. JWT Token Management

Issue: localStorage tokens vulnerable to XSS; no revocation mechanism Solution: Improve token security

  • Move to HttpOnly cookies for tokens (with CSRF protection)
  • Implement token revocation via Redis blacklist
  • Add refresh token rotation for improved security
  • Consider shorter token lifetimes (1 hour instead of 24)

Trade-offs: More complex authentication flow; additional Redis dependency

Scaling Bottlenecks

1. PostgreSQL as Synchronization Point

Issue: Database becomes bottleneck with high concurrent editing Solution: Distributed event sourcing architecture

  • Use specialized append-only event store for document operations
  • Implement document-specific sharding/partitioning strategy
  • Consider purpose-built databases for collaborative editing (e.g., FaunaDB)

Trade-offs: Increases system complexity; potentially higher infrastructure costs

2. Inefficient Document Storage

Issue: Full HTML snapshots are storage-inefficient and risky Solution: Hybrid storage approach

  • Store document operations as an append-only log (event sourcing)
  • Generate snapshots at logical points (not time-based), like after major changes
  • Store documents as structured data (e.g., JSON) instead of raw HTML
  • Implement incremental document loading for large documents

Trade-offs: More complex recovery and rendering logic; requires migration strategy

3. CDN Caching of Dynamic Content

Issue: 5-minute API caching conflicts with real-time editing Solution: Targeted caching strategy

  • Cache only static assets and immutable resources
  • Use cache-control headers to prevent caching of document content
  • Implement cache invalidation for resources that do change occasionally

Trade-offs: Reduced CDN effectiveness; potentially higher origin load

4. WebSocket Connection Distribution

Issue: Uneven connection distribution across servers Solution: Dedicated real-time tier

  • Separate WebSocket handling from API servers
  • Implement consistent hashing for connection distribution
  • Consider specialized WebSocket services (e.g., Pusher, Socket.io service)

Trade-offs: Additional infrastructure component; higher operational complexity

Recommended Priority Fixes

  1. Implement proper real-time synchronization (Redis pub/sub)
  2. Replace client clock timestamps with server-based logical clocks
  3. Upgrade document storage strategy to incremental operations
  4. Improve WebSocket reliability with reconnection handling
  5. Fix authentication security issues with proper token management

These changes would significantly improve reliability, correctness, and performance of your collaborative editing system.

Debug This Architecture

Turn this model response into notes, narration, or a short video

Auto NotesTranscriptNarrateVideo Cut

Partner link

This output is part of our open dataset — 5K+ AI responses across 200 models

About Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet

Capabilities

ConversationReasoningAnalysisSummarization

Categories

TextVisionMultimodal

Specifications

Provider
Anthropic
Released
2025-02-26
Size
LARGE
Parameters
Not disclosed
Context
200,000 tokens

Keep exploring

SAME PROMPT

Claude Sonnet 4.6's version

Same prompt, different result

COMPARE

Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

Both outputs, side by side

Compare AI vibes, not scores. Side-by-side outputs across the world's best models.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Leaderboard
  • Challenges

Discover

  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • .llmignore
  • Badges
  • RIVAL Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival