4 models have responded to the "Debug This Architecture" challenge. Compare their approaches side-by-side on RIVAL. This response is part of RIVAL's open dataset of 5,600+ AI model responses.
Claude 3 7 Sonnet Thinking's response to the 'Debug This Architecture' challenge.
Here's the architecture for a real-time collaborative document editor (like Google Docs): **System Overview:** - Frontend: React SPA with WebSocket connections - Backend: Node.js API servers behind a load balancer (round-robin) - Database: PostgreSQL for document storage, Redis for session cache - Real-time: Each API server maintains its own WebSocket connections to clients - Sync Strategy: Last-write-wins with timestamps from client clocks - Storage: Documents saved as full HTML snapshots every 30 seconds - Auth: JWT tokens with 24-hour expiry, stored in localStorage - CDN: CloudFront for static assets, also caches API responses for 5 minutes **Data Flow:** 1. User types → change event sent via WebSocket to their connected server 2. Server writes change to PostgreSQL 3. Server broadcasts change to all WebSocket clients connected to THAT server 4. Other servers poll PostgreSQL every 2 seconds for changes 5. Conflict resolution: if two users edit the same paragraph, last timestamp wins **Scaling Plan:** - Horizontal scaling by adding more API servers - Database read replicas for read-heavy operations - Document partitioning by organization ID Identify all potential failure modes, race conditions, and scaling bottlenecks in this architecture. For each issue found, propose a specific solution with trade-offs.
Issue: Client connections can fail due to network issues or server restarts, causing lost updates. Solution: Implement automatic reconnection with change buffering
Trade-offs: Increases client-side complexity; potential for complex conflict resolution when reconnecting after extended offline periods
Issue: Changes only broadcast to clients connected to the same server Solution: Replace polling with a proper pub/sub system
Trade-offs: Adds Redis as another critical component; requires handling Redis outages
Issue: If PostgreSQL fails, the entire system becomes unusable Solution: Implement multi-level persistence strategy
Trade-offs: Significantly increases operational complexity; eventual consistency challenges
Issue: Using client clocks for conflict resolution is unreliable Solution: Implement proper distributed sequence tracking
Trade-offs: OT/CRDTs introduce significant implementation complexity; requires more metadata with each change
Issue: Paragraph-level "last-write-wins" causes data loss during concurrent edits Solution: Implement finer-grained conflict resolution
Trade-offs: Increases computational overhead; more complex data model
Issue: localStorage tokens vulnerable to XSS; no revocation mechanism Solution: Improve token security
Trade-offs: More complex authentication flow; additional Redis dependency
Issue: Database becomes bottleneck with high concurrent editing Solution: Distributed event sourcing architecture
Trade-offs: Increases system complexity; potentially higher infrastructure costs
Issue: Full HTML snapshots are storage-inefficient and risky Solution: Hybrid storage approach
Trade-offs: More complex recovery and rendering logic; requires migration strategy
Issue: 5-minute API caching conflicts with real-time editing Solution: Targeted caching strategy
Trade-offs: Reduced CDN effectiveness; potentially higher origin load
Issue: Uneven connection distribution across servers Solution: Dedicated real-time tier
Trade-offs: Additional infrastructure component; higher operational complexity
These changes would significantly improve reliability, correctness, and performance of your collaborative editing system.
Turn this model response into notes, narration, or a short video
Partner link