Skip to content
Rival
Models
CompareBest ForArena
Sign Up
Sign Up

Compare AI vibes, not scores. Side-by-side outputs across the world's best models.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Leaderboard
  • Challenges

Discover

  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • .llmignore
  • Badges
  • RIVAL Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival
Rival
Models
CompareBest ForArena
Sign Up
Sign Up

Compare AI vibes, not scores. Side-by-side outputs across the world's best models.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Leaderboard
  • Challenges

Discover

  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • .llmignore
  • Badges
  • RIVAL Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival
  1. Home
  2. Models
  3. Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet
  4. Estimate Complexity

See how Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet compares on this challenge:

  • Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet vs Claude Sonnet 4.6
  • Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
  • Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet vs Z.ai: GLM 5

4 models have responded to the "Estimate Complexity" challenge. Compare their approaches side-by-side on RIVAL. This response is part of RIVAL's open dataset of 5,600+ AI model responses.

Rival
Models
CompareBest ForArena
Sign Up
Sign Up
Back to Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet

Estimate Complexity

Claude 3.7 Sonnet Thinking's response to the Tests an AI's ability to make educated estimates based on technical knowledge

Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet
February 26, 2025
Text

?
Prompt

Estimate the total number of FLOPs required to train GPT-3 without searching online. Explain your reasoning step by step.

Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet
Response

claude-3.7-sonnet-thinking logo
Claude 3.7 Thinking SonnetEstimate Complexity
claude-3.7-sonnet-thinking logo
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet

Estimating GPT-3 Training FLOPs

I'll estimate the total number of floating point operations (FLOPs) required to train GPT-3 by breaking down the calculation step by step.

Model Architecture Facts

  • GPT-3 has approximately 175 billion parameters
  • Uses a transformer architecture with multiple layers
  • Context length of 2048 tokens
  • Trained on approximately 300 billion tokens

Calculating FLOPs per Token

For transformer models, we need to account for operations in:

  1. Self-attention mechanisms
  2. Feed-forward networks
  3. Layer normalization and other operations

For GPT-3, let's use these parameters:

  • Embedding dimension (d): ~12,288
  • Number of layers (L): ~96
  • Context length (s): 2,048

Forward Pass Calculation

For each token in each layer:

  • Self-attention: ~4 × d² + 2 × d × s FLOPs
  • Feed-forward network: ~8 × d² FLOPs
  • Other operations: ~d FLOPs

Total FLOPs per token (forward pass): ≈ L × (12 × d² + 2 × d × s) ≈ 96 × (12 × 12,288² + 2 × 12,288 × 2,048) ≈ 96 × (1.8 × 10⁹ + 5 × 10⁷) ≈ 1.8 × 10¹¹ FLOPs

Backward Pass

The backward pass typically requires about 2× the computation of the forward pass: ≈ 2 × 1.8 × 10¹¹ ≈ 3.6 × 10¹¹ FLOPs

Total FLOPs per token (forward + backward): ≈ 1.8 × 10¹¹ + 3.6 × 10¹¹ ≈ 5.4 × 10¹¹ FLOPs

Total Training FLOPs

Multiply by the total number of tokens processed: ≈ 5.4 × 10¹¹ × 300 × 10⁹ ≈ 1.62 × 10²³ FLOPs

Alternative Calculation

As a sanity check, using a simpler heuristic:

  • Each parameter requires ~2-4 FLOPs per token (including forward, backward, and weight update)
  • 175B parameters × 4 FLOPs × 300B tokens ≈ 2.1 × 10²³ FLOPs

Conclusion

The total training computation for GPT-3 was approximately 1.6-2.1 × 10²³ FLOPs (160-210 zettaFLOPs).

This massive computational requirement explains why training such models costs millions of dollars and requires specialized supercomputing infrastructure.

Estimate Complexity

Turn this model response into notes, narration, or a short video

Auto NotesTranscriptNarrateVideo Cut

Partner link

This output is part of our open dataset — 5K+ AI responses across 200 models

About Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet

Capabilities

ConversationReasoningAnalysisSummarization

Categories

TextVisionMultimodal

Specifications

Provider
Anthropic
Released
2025-02-26
Size
LARGE
Parameters
Not disclosed
Context
200,000 tokens

Keep exploring

SAME PROMPT

Claude Sonnet 4.6's version

Same prompt, different result

COMPARE

Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

Both outputs, side by side

Compare AI vibes, not scores. Side-by-side outputs across the world's best models.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Leaderboard
  • Challenges

Discover

  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • .llmignore
  • Badges
  • RIVAL Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival