Skip to content
Rival
Models
CompareBest ForArena
Sign Up
Sign Up

Compare AI vibes, not scores. Side-by-side outputs across the world's best models.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Leaderboard
  • Challenges

Discover

  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • .llmignore
  • Badges
  • RIVAL Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival
Rival
Models
CompareBest ForArena
Sign Up
Sign Up

Compare AI vibes, not scores. Side-by-side outputs across the world's best models.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Leaderboard
  • Challenges

Discover

  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • .llmignore
  • Badges
  • RIVAL Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival
  1. Home
  2. Models
  3. Claude Opus 4.1
  4. Debug This Architecture

See how Claude Opus 4.1 compares on this challenge:

  • Claude Opus 4.1 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6
  • Claude Opus 4.1 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
  • Claude Opus 4.1 vs Z.ai: GLM 5

4 models have responded to the "Debug This Architecture" challenge. Compare their approaches side-by-side on RIVAL. This response is part of RIVAL's open dataset of 5,600+ AI model responses.

Rival
Models
CompareBest ForArena
Sign Up
Sign Up
Back to Claude Opus 4.1

Debug This Architecture

Claude Opus 4 1's response to the 'Debug This Architecture' challenge.

Claude Opus 4.1
February 3, 2026
Text

?
Prompt

Here's the architecture for a real-time collaborative document editor (like Google Docs): **System Overview:** - Frontend: React SPA with WebSocket connections - Backend: Node.js API servers behind a load balancer (round-robin) - Database: PostgreSQL for document storage, Redis for session cache - Real-time: Each API server maintains its own WebSocket connections to clients - Sync Strategy: Last-write-wins with timestamps from client clocks - Storage: Documents saved as full HTML snapshots every 30 seconds - Auth: JWT tokens with 24-hour expiry, stored in localStorage - CDN: CloudFront for static assets, also caches API responses for 5 minutes **Data Flow:** 1. User types → change event sent via WebSocket to their connected server 2. Server writes change to PostgreSQL 3. Server broadcasts change to all WebSocket clients connected to THAT server 4. Other servers poll PostgreSQL every 2 seconds for changes 5. Conflict resolution: if two users edit the same paragraph, last timestamp wins **Scaling Plan:** - Horizontal scaling by adding more API servers - Database read replicas for read-heavy operations - Document partitioning by organization ID Identify all potential failure modes, race conditions, and scaling bottlenecks in this architecture. For each issue found, propose a specific solution with trade-offs.

Claude Opus 4.1
Response

claude-opus-4.1 logo
Claude Opus 4.1Debug This Architecture
claude-opus-4.1 logo
Claude Opus 4.1

Critical Issues Analysis

1. Split-Brain Real-time Synchronization

Problem: Users connected to different API servers experience 2+ second delays due to polling mechanism, creating divergent document states and poor collaboration experience.

Solution: Implement Redis Pub/Sub or dedicated message broker (RabbitMQ/Kafka)

  • Implementation: Each server publishes changes to Redis channel, all servers subscribe
  • Trade-offs:
    • ✅ Sub-100ms propagation between servers
    • ❌ Additional Redis load and potential SPOF
    • ❌ Need to handle Redis connection failures gracefully

2. Clock Skew in Conflict Resolution

Problem: Client clock differences cause incorrect last-write-wins resolution, potentially losing recent edits.

Solution: Hybrid Vector Clocks + Server Timestamps

{
  serverTimestamp: 1234567890,
  vectorClock: {userId1: 5, userId2: 3},
  operation: {...}
}
  • Trade-offs:
    • ✅ Accurate causality tracking
    • ❌ Increased complexity and message size
    • ❌ Requires conflict resolution UI for true conflicts

3. Data Loss from 30-Second Snapshot Window

Problem: System crash or network partition can lose up to 30 seconds of work.

Solution: Implement Operation Log with Checkpointing

  • Store individual operations in PostgreSQL with periodic snapshots
  • Reconstruct documents from last snapshot + operations
  • Trade-offs:
    • ✅ Minimal data loss, full audit trail
    • ❌ Increased storage (mitigate with compression)
    • ❌ Complex reconstruction logic

4. WebSocket Connection Storm on Server Failure

Problem: Server crash causes all clients to reconnect simultaneously, overwhelming remaining servers.

Solution: Exponential Backoff with Jitter + Connection Pooling

reconnectDelay = Math.min(baseDelay * Math.pow(2, attempt) + random(0, 1000), maxDelay)
  • Implement WebSocket connection limits per server
  • Trade-offs:
    • ✅ Prevents cascade failures
    • ❌ Slower recovery for some users
    • ❌ Need sticky sessions or state migration

5. Operational Transform Inconsistency

Problem: Concurrent edits to same paragraph with last-write-wins causes character-level corruption.

Solution: Implement Proper OT or CRDT (Yjs/Automerge)

  • Use operation transformation for character-level merging
  • Trade-offs:
    • ✅ Preserves all users' intentions
    • ❌ Significant implementation complexity
    • ❌ Larger operation payload size

6. PostgreSQL Write Bottleneck

Problem: All changes funnel through single master database, limiting throughput.

Solution: Write-Through Cache + Async Batch Writes

// Buffer operations in Redis, batch write to PostgreSQL
await redis.lpush(`doc:${docId}:ops`, operation);
// Background job processes queue every 100ms or 100 operations
  • Trade-offs:
    • ✅ 10x+ write throughput improvement
    • ❌ Potential data loss if Redis fails
    • ❌ Increased system complexity

7. JWT Token Security Vulnerabilities

Problem: localStorage tokens vulnerable to XSS, no refresh mechanism, 24-hour window too long.

Solution: httpOnly Cookies + Refresh Token Pattern

  • Access token: 15 minutes, in memory
  • Refresh token: 7 days, httpOnly cookie
  • Implement token rotation on refresh
  • Trade-offs:
    • ✅ Significantly improved security
    • ❌ More complex auth flow
    • ❌ CSRF protection needed

8. CDN Cache Poisoning

Problem: 5-minute API response caching can serve stale document data.

Solution: Cache-Control Headers + Versioned Endpoints

Cache-Control: private, max-age=0, must-revalidate
ETag: "document-version-hash"
  • Use CDN only for truly static assets
  • Trade-offs:
    • ✅ Always fresh data
    • ❌ Higher origin server load
    • ❌ Increased bandwidth costs

9. Database Partition by Organization Creates Hot Shards

Problem: Large organizations create hotspots, limiting scalability.

Solution: Consistent Hashing with Virtual Nodes

  • Hash(orgId + docId) for distribution
  • Implement document sharding within large orgs
  • Trade-offs:
    • ✅ Even load distribution
    • ❌ Cross-shard queries become complex
    • ❌ Need distributed transaction support

10. No Presence Awareness

Problem: Users can't see who else is editing, leading to conflicts.

Solution: Cursor Position Broadcasting + Presence Service

  • Track active users per document in Redis
  • Broadcast cursor positions via WebSocket
  • Trade-offs:
    • ✅ Better collaboration UX
    • ❌ Increased message volume
    • ❌ Privacy considerations

Priority Fixes

  1. Immediate: Replace polling with Pub/Sub (fixes collaboration lag)
  2. Critical: Implement proper OT/CRDT (prevents data corruption)
  3. Important: Add operation log (prevents data loss)
  4. Important: Fix auth security (prevents breaches)
  5. Nice-to-have: Add presence awareness (improves UX)

Each fix should be implemented incrementally with feature flags for safe rollout and rollback capability.

Debug This Architecture

Turn this model response into notes, narration, or a short video

Auto NotesTranscriptNarrateVideo Cut

Partner link

This output is part of our open dataset — 5K+ AI responses across 200 models

About Claude Opus 4.1

Capabilities

ConversationReasoningCode GenerationAnalysisAgentic Tool UsePlanning

Categories

TextCodeMultimodal

Specifications

Provider
Anthropic
Released
2025-08-05
Size
XLARGE
Parameters
Not disclosed
Context
200,000 tokens

Keep exploring

SAME PROMPT

Claude Sonnet 4.6's version

Same prompt, different result

COMPARE

Claude Opus 4.1 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

Both outputs, side by side

Compare AI vibes, not scores. Side-by-side outputs across the world's best models.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Leaderboard
  • Challenges

Discover

  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • .llmignore
  • Badges
  • RIVAL Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival