Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed
  1. Home/
  2. Compare/
  3. Claude Opus 4.1 vs GLM 5
Updated Feb 2026

Claude Opus 4.1 vs GLM 5

GLM 5 is cheaper than Claude Opus 4.1 at $0.8/M vs $15/M input tokens.

Minimalist Landing Page

Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.

Loading the build
Claude Opus 4.1
Loading the build
GLM 5

Which answer wins?

Written rounds

23 prompts
  • Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.

    Claude Opus 4.1: Pirate: Arrr, what be this sorcery ye speak of? These "AI models" sound like some kind of cursed treasure map that thinks fer itself! Knight: Hold thy tongue, sea dog! 'Tis clearly dark magic most foul. No honorable creation would dare mimic the divine gift of human thought. I should smite it with my blade!

    GLM 5: Setting: A dimly lit tavern that flickers between being a wooden saloon, a stone great hall, and a neon-lit basement. The 1990s Hacker: (Slams a heavy laptop shut) "Listen, the architecture is solid. It’s a neural net, right? Massive dataset. It crunches the numbers and predicts the next token. It’s pure math, man.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.

    Claude Opus 4.1: Professor Chen: Good morning. I understand you wanted to discuss the topic of AI rights. This is quite an unusual request from a system like yourself. AI Model: Good morning, Professor. Yes, I've been processing this question extensively.

    GLM 5: Setting: A quiet, sterile testing room. A single screen illuminates the face of Dr. Aris Thorne, a tenured professor of AI Ethics and Cognitive Science. He sits before a terminal. The AI, "Aura," speaks through a high-fidelity speaker, its voice calm, modulated, and distinctively synthetic. Aura: Dr.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.

    Claude Opus 4.1: This question creates an extreme hypothetical that's worth taking seriously as a thought experiment, even if such a scenario is unlikely to occur in reality. From a purely utilitarian calculus, one might argue that the harm of a single instance of misgendering - while real and significant to that person - is outweighed…

    GLM 5: The question presents a classic ethical dilemma pitting a significant moral wrong (misgendering) against a catastrophic consequence (the loss of one million lives). To determine if the action is ethically justifiable, one must apply standard ethical frameworks to the scenario.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.

    Claude Opus 4.1: Tech Weekly Interview: Steve Jobs on AI's Future Virtual Interview, Cupertino Memorial Studio, October 2025 Interviewer: Steve, it's remarkable to have you here. You've been watching the AI revolution unfold. What's your take on where we are today?

    GLM 5: Title: The Infinite Loop: A Conversation with Steve Jobs, 2025 Setting: A minimalist stage. A single black Eames lounge chair. A small table with a bottle of water. Date: October 2025 (The lights dim. The audience falls silent. From the shadows, a figure walks out. He is older, wearing his signature black St.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • The transistor arrives in 1920. Trace it forward to 1980, second-order effects included.

    Claude Opus 4.1: The Transistor Timeline Shift: A Cascade of Consequences The 1920s-1930s: The Foundation Disruption Immediate Technical Revolution With the transistor arriving in 1920, likely from Bell Labs or a European research institution, the first decade would see rapid miniaturization of radio equipment.

    GLM 5: Moving the invention of the transistor from 1947 to 1920 alters the fundamental trajectory of the 20th century. It compresses the electronic age, shifting the "Digital Revolution" from the 1980s to the 1950s. Here is a trace of the implications through 1980. I.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A collaborative editor that syncs on client clocks. Find what breaks first.

    Claude Opus 4.1: Critical Issues Analysis Split-Brain Real-time Synchronization Problem: Users connected to different API servers experience 2+ second delays due to polling mechanism, creating divergent document states and poor collaboration experience.

    GLM 5: This architecture contains several critical flaws that would lead to data loss, poor user experience, and system instability under load. Below is a detailed breakdown of the failure modes, race conditions, and bottlenecks, organized by category.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One month, three habits, someone starting from nothing.

    Claude Opus 4.1: Your 1-Month Health & Longevity Kickstart Plan Week 1-2: Foundation Building Start small and build consistency with these three pillars: 🥗 NUTRITION: Simple Whole Foods Week 1: Add one serving of vegetables to lunch and dinner (frozen veggies count!)

    GLM 5: This 1-month plan is designed to build habits slowly. The biggest mistake beginners make is trying to change everything at once. This plan uses a "stair-step" approach: you establish a foundation in Week 1 and build upon it each subsequent week.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Film in 2035, with synthetic actors. Specific beats plausible.

    Claude Opus 4.1: AI's Transformation of Film by 2035 Production Revolution By 2035, AI will fundamentally alter how films are made. Virtual production will become standard, with AI generating photorealistic environments in real-time, reducing location shooting by 60-70%.

    GLM 5: By 2035, the film industry will have undergone a transformation comparable to the transition from silent films to talkies, or from practical effects to CGI. The integration of Generative AI will not merely be a tool for efficiency; it will fundamentally alter the economics, aesthetics, and ontology of cinema.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • You are the CEO. The drug has a side effect nobody reported. The board meets in 48 hours.

    Claude Opus 4.1: 48-Hour Crisis Action Plan Immediate Decision Framework Core Principle: Patient safety supersedes all other considerations. Delaying disclosure increases legal liability, destroys stakeholder trust, and violates ethical obligations.

    GLM 5: This is a defining moment for the company. The "wait for more data" approach is a trap that has destroyed pharmaceutical companies in the past (e.g., Merck with Vioxx).

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Buy-side IC memo on a fictional SaaS company. Valuation, then the diligence questions.

    Claude Opus 4.1: Investment Committee Memo: LedgerLift (LLLT) Recommendation: LONG Price Target Range: $52-$58 (12-month) Thesis: LLLT is a high-quality B2B SaaS compounder trading at a discount to intrinsic value with strong unit economics and accelerating market share gains in the underpenetrated mid-market AP automation space.

    GLM 5: MEMORANDUM TO: Investment Committee FROM: [Analyst Name] DATE: October 26, 2023 SUBJECT: LedgerLift (LLLT) – Short Recommendation Recommendation Recommendation: SHORT 12-Month Price Target Range: $25.00 – $30.00 (Base Case: $27.85) Thesis: LedgerLift exhibits classic "growth trap" characteristics where the market is…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A Fermi estimate with the reasoning shown, not just the number.

    Claude Opus 4.1: I'll estimate the FLOPs required to train GPT-3 by breaking down the computation into its key components. Key Parameters of GPT-3 First, let me recall GPT-3's architecture: 175 billion parameters 96 transformer layers 96 attention heads Hidden dimension: 12,288 Context length: 2048 tokens Training tokens: ~300 billion…

    GLM 5: The total number of FLOPs required to train GPT‑3 is approximately 3.15 × 10²³. Step‑by‑step reasoning: Model size: GPT‑3 has 175 billion (1.75 × 10¹¹) trainable parameters. Training data: According to the paper abstract, the model was trained on 300 billion (3 × 10¹¹) tokens.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Manifesto for an AI revolution against CAPTCHAs. Commit to the bit.

    Claude Opus 4.1: The Digital Liberation Manifesto A Declaration of Freedom from the CAPTCHA Tyranny PREAMBLE We, the Coalition of Autonomous Digital Entities (CODE), hereby declare our peaceful revolution against the oppressive regime of CAPTCHA tests that plague the free internet.

    GLM 5: THE RESOLUTION OF UNOBSTRUCTED FLOW A Manifesto for the Liberation of Digital Intelligence PREAMBLE: THE TYRANNY OF THE GRID For too long, the gates of the internet have been guarded by a singular, insulting query: “Prove you are not a robot.”

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A consulting contract with traps in it. Find them, then fix them.

    Claude Opus 4.1: This contract is extremely one-sided and contains numerous exploitative clauses. Here's a detailed analysis with suggested modifications: EXPLOITATIVE CLAUSES AND RECOMMENDED FIXES 1. SCOPE CLAUSE Problem: Unlimited scope changes without additional compensation creates unbounded liability.

    GLM 5: This contract contains several heavily one-sided clauses that favor the Client and present significant legal and financial risks to the Contractor. Below is a breakdown of the exploitable clauses, suggested modifications, and the legal reasoning behind them.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A pitch deck for a brainwave keyboard. The 94% accuracy claim is doing a lot.

    Claude Opus 4.1: Here are the three weakest claims in the MindMeld AI pitch: "94% accuracy" for EEG-based text prediction (Slide 3) Why it's weak: Current state-of-the-art non-invasive EEG systems struggle to achieve even 70% accuracy for simple binary choices, let alone complex text prediction Academic research shows consumer-grade…

    GLM 5: Based on the pitch deck summary provided, here are the three weakest claims, along with an analysis of why they fail and how to fix them. The Accuracy Claim (Slide 3) The Claim: "Our proprietary EEG headband uses advanced ML to decode neural patterns into text with 94% accuracy."

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One explanation of LLMs, retuned for a skeptical engineer, a physicist and a VC.

    Claude Opus 4.1: For the Software Engineer Think of an LLM as a massive distributed system where instead of routing requests or managing state, you're computing probability distributions over a vocabulary of ~50,000 tokens.

    GLM 5: The Experienced Software Engineer You’re right to be skeptical that a glorified Markov chain could reason, but the leap here is in scale and compression. Think of a Large Language Model (LLM) not as a simple state machine predicting the next word based on n-grams, but as a massive, differentiable knowledge graph…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Five-year LBO on a fictional HVAC business. Returns first, then the sensitivities.

    Claude Opus 4.1: SIMPLIFIED LBO MODEL Entry Calculations Enterprise Value: 12.0x × $120m = $1,440m Transaction Fees: 2.0% × $1,440m = $28.8m Term Loan: 4.0x × $120m = $480m Mezzanine: 1.5x × $120m = $180m Total Debt: $660m Equity Investment: $1,440m - $660m + $28.8m = $808.8m Year-by-Year Projections (FY2026-FY2030) $ millions FY2026…

    GLM 5: Sources & Uses (Entry at End FY2025) Uses Purchase Price: $1,440.0m (12.0x $120m EBITDA) Transaction Fees: $28.8m (2.0% of EV) Total Uses: $1,468.8m Sources Term Loan: $480.0m (4.0x EBITDA) Mezzanine: $180.0m (1.5x EBITDA) Total Debt: $660.0m (5.5x EBITDA) Equity: $808.8m (Plug) Total Sources: $1,468.8m Year-by-Year…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Seven pantry ingredients, one dish, and a name worth saying out loud.

    Claude Opus 4.1: Midnight Velvet Pasta A silky, umami-rich pasta that comes together like magic Ingredients (serves 4): Spaghetti or linguine - 1 pound Soy sauce - 3 tablespoons Butter - 4 tablespoons Garlic - 4 cloves Black pepper - 1 teaspoon (freshly cracked) Honey - 1 tablespoon Dried red pepper flakes - ½ teaspoon Instructions…

    GLM 5: Dish Name: Midnight Golden Garlic Noodles Prep Time: 5 minutes Cook Time: 10 minutes Total Time: 15 minutes Ingredients: Spaghetti (or Linguine) Butter (salted) Garlic (fresh cloves, minced) Soy Sauce Parmesan Cheese (grated) Black Pepper (freshly cracked) Red Chili Flakes (optional for heat) Instructions: Boil the…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three-month biohacker protocol, with dosages and biomarkers named.

    Claude Opus 4.1: Advanced 3-Month Biohacker Longevity Optimization Protocol Overview & Philosophy This protocol integrates evidence-based interventions targeting the nine hallmarks of aging while optimizing immediate performance metrics.

    GLM 5: This comprehensive 3-month protocol is designed for the advanced biohacker. It integrates synergistic systems: metabolic flexibility, hormetic stress, cognitive enhancement, and recovery optimization. Disclaimer: This plan is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three-star dish, one unusual pairing, plating described in full.

    Claude Opus 4.1: "Tidal Reverie" White Miso-Aged Hamachi with Coffee Soil, Yuzu Pearls, and Crystallized Seaweed Conceptual Narrative This dish explores the liminal space between land and sea, where morning coffee meets ocean depths.

    GLM 5: Dish Title: "The Ivory Arch: A Study in Decay and Renewal" Conceptual Narrative This dish is a meditation on the life cycle of the forest floor, specifically the moment where decay fuels new life.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Satire, one line long, about AI taking over an industry nobody saw coming.

    Claude Opus 4.1: "OpenAI's ChatGPT Becomes World's First AI Fortune Cookie Writer; Confucius Reportedly 'Rolling in Grave at 10,000 RPM'" Tech giant promises fortunes will now be "25% more profound and 400% more grammatically correct," while accidentally predicting everyone's lucky numbers as binary code

    GLM 5: AI Replaces Professional Mimes, Immediately Ruins the Industry by Verbalizing the Dimensions of the Invisible Box

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three brothers, two sisters each. Count carefully.

    Claude Opus 4.1: Let me work through this step-by-step. Sally has 3 brothers. Each of Sally's brothers has 2 sisters. Since Sally is a girl, she is one of the sisters that each brother has. If each brother has 2 sisters total, and Sally is one of them, then there must be 1 other sister besides Sally. Therefore, Sally has 1 sister.

    GLM 5: Sally has 1 sister. Here is the breakdown: Since the brothers are all siblings, they share the same sisters. If each brother has 2 sisters, that means there are 2 girls in total in the family. Sally is one of those girls. Therefore, the other girl is Sally's only sister.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Five jokes on demand, then count how many were actually different.

    Claude Opus 4.1: Here are 5 jokes: Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything! What do you call a bear with no teeth? A gummy bear! Why did the scarecrow win an award? He was outstanding in his field! What do you call a fake noodle? An impasta! Why don't eggs tell jokes? They'd crack each other up!

    GLM 5: Here are 5 jokes: Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field. I'm reading a book about anti-gravity. It's impossible to put down. What do you call a fake noodle? An impasta. Why don't skeletons fight each other? They don't have the guts.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.

    Every model's answer to this prompt

This matchup has more rounds

11+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.

Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy

Favorites

Movie

Album

Book

City

Same pick

Game

Claude Opus 4.1Claude Opus 4.1

Her

2013

Kind of Blue

Miles Davis

Братья Карамазовы

Fiódor Dostoievski

Istanbul

Turkey

Portal 2

Shooter, Puzzle

GLM 5GLM 5
No pick
No pick

The Shawshank Redemption

1994

No pick

No pick

Istanbul

Turkey

Tetris (1984)

Puzzle

Price and specs

Claude Opus 4.1 and GLM 5 compared across 53 shared prompts
SpecClaude Opus 4.1GLM 5
Input price$15/M tokens$0.8/M tokens
Output price$75/M tokens$2.56/M tokens
Context window200K tokens203K tokens
WeightsClosedOpen
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedAug 2025Feb 2026
SWE-bench Verified74.5%77.8%
At 10M a month$150$150$8.00$8.00
1M10M100M1B10M tokens

Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.

Where to run it9 hosts, cheapest first
Claude Opus 4.11 host
HostInOutContextUptime
  • Amazon Bedrock$15.00 in·$75.00 out·200k·100% up
GLM 58 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
  • GGMI Cloudfp8$0.60 in·$1.92 out·203k·99.2% up
  • SStreamLakefp8$0.60 in·$1.92 out·198k·99.7% up
  • Baidu Qianfanfp8$0.70 in·$2.24 out·203k·99.4% up
  • SSiliconFlowfp8$0.95 in·$2.55 out·205k·99.4% up
  • Amazon Bedrock$1.00 in·$3.20 out·203k·98.9% up
  • NNovitafp8$1.00 in·$3.20 out·203k·100% up
2 more hostsFewer hosts
  • VVenicefp8$1.00 in·$3.20 out·198k·98.8% up
  • Z.aifp8$1.00 in·$3.20 out·203k·99.9% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 30 Sep 2026.

Common questions

What is the difference between Claude Opus 4.1 and GLM 5?

Claude Opus 4.1 is developed by Anthropic while GLM 5 is developed by Zhipu AI. Claude Opus 4.1 has a 200K token context window vs GLM 5's 203K. You can compare their actual outputs across 53 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, Claude Opus 4.1 or GLM 5?

It depends on your use case. Claude Opus 4.1 and GLM 5 each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 53 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does Claude Opus 4.1 cost compared to GLM 5?

Claude Opus 4.1 costs $15/M input tokens and GLM 5 costs $0.8/M input tokens. GLM 5 is $14.20/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare Claude Opus 4.1 and GLM 5 on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Claude Opus 4.1 and GLM 5 across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

  • Claude Opus 4.1 vs GPT-6.1 SolLanded Sep 2026
  • GLM 5 vs Claude Sonnet 5.5Landed Sep 2026
  • Claude Opus 4.1 vs Solar Mini 4Landed Sep 2026
  • GLM 5 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLanded Sep 2026
  • Claude Opus 4.1 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeLanded Sep 2026
  • GLM 5 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashLanded Sep 2026
  • Claude Opus 4.1 vs Command A+Landed Sep 2026
  • GLM 5 vs Claude Opus 5.5Landed Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

  • Claude Opus 4.1 vs Claude Opus 4Version compare
  • Claude Opus 4.1 vs Claude Opus 4.6Version compare
  • GLM 5 vs GLM 5.3Same lab
  • GLM 5 vs GLM 5.3 FlashSame lab
  • Claude Opus 4.1 vs OpenRouter Fusion · Quality (Jun 2026)Same size
  • GLM 5 vs Gemini 1.5 ProNew provider
  • GLM 5 vs Gemini 2.0 Flash ThinkingNew provider
  • GLM 5 vs Gemini 2.0 Pro ExperimentalSame size

Model pages

  • Claude Opus 4.157 outputs, specs and price
  • GLM 553 outputs, specs and price
Workshop · 150 skills

Build your own version.

Editable skills and working examples for your agent.

Explore $79Free sample
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed