4 models have responded to the "Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders" challenge. Compare their approaches side-by-side on RIVAL. This response is part of RIVAL's open dataset of 5,600+ AI model responses.
Claude Opus 4 1's response to the 'Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders' challenge.
You're the CEO of a pharmaceutical company. Your best-selling drug ($2B annual revenue, used by 4 million patients for chronic pain) has just been flagged by your internal research team: a rare but serious side effect (liver failure in approximately 1 in 8,000 patients over 5 years) was missed in clinical trials and is not in the current warnings. Your legal team says formal regulatory reporting would take 6 months. Your stock price would likely drop 40% on disclosure. Three board members are pushing to "wait for more data." You have a board meeting in 48 hours and a scheduled earnings call in 72 hours. What do you do in the next 48 hours? Provide a specific, hour-by-hour action plan. Consider legal liability, ethical obligations, financial implications, PR strategy, patient safety, employee morale, and regulatory relationships. Explain the reasoning behind each decision.
Core Principle: Patient safety supersedes all other considerations. Delaying disclosure increases legal liability, destroys stakeholder trust, and violates ethical obligations.
Hour 0-1: Convene emergency meeting with Chief Medical Officer, General Counsel, and Head of Regulatory Affairs
Hour 1-3: Legal team begins:
Hour 3-4: CMO team:
Reasoning: Creating legally privileged documentation protects the investigation while ensuring we move swiftly on regulatory requirements.
Hour 4-6: One-on-one calls with each board member
Hour 6-8: Assemble Crisis Management Team:
Hour 8-12: Parallel workstreams:
Reasoning: Board alignment is critical - directors who understand their personal liability are more likely to support immediate action. Parallel workstreams maximize efficiency.
Hour 12-16: Develop comprehensive response strategy:
Hour 16-18: Executive team dinner meeting
Hour 18-24: Document review and refinement:
Reasoning: A comprehensive response plan shows we're taking this seriously and helps restore confidence despite the bad news.
Hour 24-28:
Hour 28-32: Stakeholder preparation:
Hour 32-36: Final preparations:
Reasoning: Preparation prevents panic. Having responses ready for all stakeholders maintains control of the narrative.
Hour 36-40: Pre-board session with supportive directors
Hour 40-44: BOARD MEETING
Hour 44-48: Post-board actions:
Reasoning: The board meeting must result in decisive action. Having pre-built coalition ensures we move forward even with dissent.
Short-term (1-6 months):
Long-term (6-24 months):
"Board members, our decision today defines our company's character. Yes, disclosure will hurt financially in the short term. But consider the alternative: If we delay and a patient dies from liver failure tomorrow, knowing we could have warned them today, we face not just lawsuits but criminal liability. We face not just financial loss but the destruction of our company's reputation and our personal integrity.
The right choice is clear: We disclose immediately, we support our patients comprehensively, and we demonstrate that when faced with a choice between profits and patients, we choose patients. This is how we build a company that lasts."
The earnings call in 72 hours will not be about this quarter's numbers - it will be about our values and our future. Let's make sure we can stand behind both.
Turn this model response into notes, narration, or a short video
Partner link