4 models have responded to the "Advanced Investment Memo (IC Memo)" challenge. Compare their approaches side-by-side on RIVAL. This response is part of RIVAL's open dataset of 5,600+ AI model responses.
Advanced Investment Memo (IC Memo)
Gemini 2 5 Pro Preview 06 05's response to the 'Advanced Investment Memo (IC Memo)' challenge.
?Prompt
You are writing an internal investment committee memo for a long/short equity fund. Company (fictional): LedgerLift (ticker: LLLT) – B2B spend management + AP automation SaaS for mid-market enterprises. Use only the information below. Do NOT browse the web. This is a fictional exercise, not investment advice. DATA - Current share price: $46 - Shares outstanding (basic): 190m - Net cash: $1.4B - FY2023 revenue: $560m - FY2024 revenue: $680m - FY2025 revenue: $820m - FY2025 gross margin: 78% - FY2025 operating margin: 18% - Revenue mix: 92% subscription, 8% services (services GM ~25%, subscription GM ~82%) - Customer KPIs: 6,200 customers; ARPA ~$132k; logo churn 6%/yr; gross retention 94%; NRR 123% - CAC payback: 18 months; S&M as % of revenue: 34% in FY2025 - Concentration: top 10 customers = 16% of revenue; top 1 = 3% - D&A: 2.5% of revenue - Capex: 3.0% of revenue - Net working capital investment: 1.0% of incremental revenue - Cash tax rate: 23% VALUATION ASSUMPTIONS (build 2026-2030 forecasts) Base case: - Revenue growth: 21%, 18%, 15%, 13%, 12% - Gross margin: 79%, 80%, 80%, 81%, 81% - Operating margin: 20%, 22%, 24%, 25%, 26% - WACC: 10%, terminal growth: 3% Bull case: - Revenue growth: 25%, 21%, 18%, 15%, 13% - Gross margin: 80%, 81%, 82%, 82%, 83% - Operating margin: 21%, 24%, 26%, 28%, 29% - WACC: 9%, terminal growth: 4% Bear case: - Revenue growth: 16%, 13%, 11%, 10%, 9% - Gross margin: 78%, 78%, 79%, 79%, 80% - Operating margin: 17%, 18%, 19%, 20%, 21% - WACC: 12%, terminal growth: 2% COMPS (fictional peer set) - Peer A: EV/NTM Revenue 9.0x, EV/NTM EBIT 35x - Peer B: EV/NTM Revenue 7.0x, EV/NTM EBIT 28x - Peer C: EV/NTM Revenue 11.0x, EV/NTM EBIT 42x Use the median multiple as your comps anchor, but explain adjustments. TASK Write a pro-level IC memo with: 1) Recommendation (Long/Short/Pass) + 12-month PT range + 2-sentence thesis 2) Business + why it wins / why now 3) KPI quality check (NRR, churn, CAC payback, concentration) and what could be wrong 4) Base/Bull/Bear model: show a compact table for 2026-2030 revenue, EBIT, and unlevered FCF; compute DCF EV, equity value, and implied value per share for each scenario (show key steps, not every line) 5) Comps cross-check: implied EV and per-share range using median multiples 6) Catalysts (3), Risks (5), and "what would change my mind" (3 falsifiable triggers) 7) 10 diligence questions for management Keep the memo under ~1,200 words, excluding tables.
Response
INTERNAL INVESTMENT COMMITTEE MEMORANDUM
TO: Investment Committee FROM: [Analyst Name] DATE: October 26, 2023 SUBJECT: Long Recommendation for LedgerLift (LLLT)
1. Recommendation & Thesis
Recommendation: LONG 12-Month Price Target Range: $58 - $82 (Base to Bull Case) Current Price: $46.00
LedgerLift is a high-quality SaaS leader in the large, underpenetrated mid-market for spend management, poised for durable growth and significant margin expansion. The current valuation offers an attractive entry point, as we believe the market underappreciates the resilience of its best-in-class unit economics and the clear path to >25% operating margins.
2. Business Overview & Investment Thesis
LedgerLift provides a unified, cloud-native platform for B2B spend management and accounts payable (AP) automation to mid-market enterprises. Its modules help finance teams control corporate spending, automate invoice processing, and manage vendor payments, replacing inefficient manual workflows and disparate legacy systems. The revenue model is classic SaaS, with 92% of revenue from recurring subscriptions.
Why It Wins: LedgerLift’s competitive advantage is rooted in its product-led growth motion and strong network effects. The platform is purpose-built for the mid-market (~100-2,000 employees), an often-overlooked segment caught between simplistic SMB tools and overly complex, expensive enterprise ERP modules (e.g., SAP Concur, Oracle NetSuite). Its ease of use drives high adoption within customer organizations, and as more suppliers are onboarded for AP automation, the platform becomes stickier and more valuable for the entire customer ecosystem.
Why Now: The push for digital transformation within the CFO’s office has accelerated. In the current macroeconomic environment, mid-market companies are intensely focused on controlling costs, optimizing working capital, and improving operational efficiency. LedgerLift directly addresses these pain points, providing a clear and rapid return on investment, making it a budget priority even in times of economic uncertainty.
3. KPI Quality Check
LedgerLift exhibits best-in-class SaaS metrics that signal a healthy, efficient, and durable business model.
- Net Revenue Retention (NRR) of 123%: This is an elite figure, indicating that the existing customer base is growing revenue by 23% annually, net of all churn and contraction. This powerful growth engine provides significant revenue visibility and is driven by customers adding more users, adopting new modules, and increasing transaction volumes on the platform.
- Gross Retention of 94% / Logo Churn of 6%: A 94% gross revenue retention rate is excellent for the mid-market, demonstrating a sticky product with high switching costs. A 6% annual logo churn is also strong, suggesting the product is mission-critical and performs as advertised.
- CAC Payback of 18 Months: This is a highly efficient go-to-market motion. A payback period under 24 months indicates strong product-market fit and disciplined sales & marketing (S&M) spend. It allows LLLT to reinvest aggressively in growth while maintaining a clear path to profitability.
- Customer Concentration: With the top 10 customers representing only 16% of revenue and the largest at just 3%, there is minimal risk of a single customer loss materially impacting results.
What Could Be Wrong? While strong, these metrics require scrutiny. The 123% NRR could be temporarily inflated by post-COVID seat expansion or recent price increases that may not be repeatable. The 18-month CAC payback could be calculated on a "blended" basis, masking higher costs to acquire new logos versus expanding existing accounts. Finally, while S&M as a percentage of revenue is guided to decline, any failure to gain leverage here would pressure our margin expansion thesis.
4. Financial Model & Valuation (DCF)
We built a 5-year DCF model based on the provided assumptions. The model forecasts a clear trajectory of high-teens revenue growth coupled with significant operating margin expansion from 18% in FY25 to 26% in FY30 in our Base Case, driving substantial unlevered free cash flow (UFCF) generation.
| Base Case Model ($m) | 2026E | 2027E | 2028E | 2029E | 2030E |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $992 | $1,171 | $ |
Turn this model response into notes, narration, or a short video
Partner link
About Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
Capabilities
Categories
Specifications
- Provider
- Released
- 2025-06-05
- Size
- XLARGE
- Parameters
- Not disclosed
- Context
- 1,048,576 tokens
