Skip to content
Rival
Models
CompareBest ForArena
Sign Up
Sign Up

Compare AI vibes, not scores. Side-by-side outputs across the world's best models.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Leaderboard
  • Challenges

Discover

  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • .llmignore
  • Badges
  • RIVAL Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival
Rival
Models
CompareBest ForArena
Sign Up
Sign Up

Compare AI vibes, not scores. Side-by-side outputs across the world's best models.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Leaderboard
  • Challenges

Discover

  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • .llmignore
  • Badges
  • RIVAL Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival
  1. Home
  2. Models
  3. Z.ai: GLM 5
  4. Mini LBO Underwrite

See how Z.ai: GLM 5 compares on this challenge:

  • Z.ai: GLM 5 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6
  • Z.ai: GLM 5 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

3 models have responded to the "Mini LBO Underwrite" challenge. Compare their approaches side-by-side on RIVAL. This response is part of RIVAL's open dataset of 5,600+ AI model responses.

Rival
Models
CompareBest ForArena
Sign Up
Sign Up
Back to Z.ai: GLM 5

Mini LBO Underwrite

Glm 5's response to the 'Mini LBO Underwrite' challenge.

Z.ai: GLM 5
February 11, 2026
Text

?
Prompt

You are underwriting a 5-year LBO for a private equity investment committee. Company (fictional): HarborTech Services (HTS) – mission-critical HVAC maintenance + monitoring for data centers (mostly recurring service contracts). Use only the information below. Do NOT browse the web. This is a fictional exercise. ENTRY (close at end of FY2025) - FY2025 revenue: $900m - FY2025 EBITDA: $120m (13.3% margin) - Purchase price: 12.0x EBITDA - Transaction fees: 2.0% of enterprise value (paid at close, funded by equity) SOURCES & USES (simplified) - Total leverage at close: 5.5x EBITDA - Term Loan: 4.0x EBITDA, 9.0% cash interest, 1.0% annual amortization - Mezzanine: 1.5x EBITDA, 12.0% cash interest + 2.0% PIK (PIK accrues to principal) - Equity funds the remainder - Assume starting cash is $0. - Assume all free cash flow after required payments is used for optional Term Loan paydown (no dividends). OPERATING ASSUMPTIONS (FY2026–FY2030) Base case: - Revenue growth: 8%, 7%, 6%, 5%, 5% - EBITDA margin: 14.0%, 15.0%, 16.0%, 16.5%, 17.0% - Capex: 3.0% of revenue - Change in NWC: 0.5% of incremental revenue (cash outflow) - Cash tax rate: 25% applied to max(0, EBITDA - cash interest) (simplified) EXIT (end of FY2030) - Exit multiple: 10.5x FY2030 EBITDA - Exit fees: 1.0% of enterprise value - Mezzanine (including PIK) is repaid at exit. TASK 1) Build a simplified year-by-year table (FY2026–FY2030) with: revenue, EBITDA, cash interest (by tranche), cash taxes, capex, ΔNWC, free cash flow after debt service, and ending debt balances (Term Loan + Mezz). 2) Compute equity IRR and MOIC. 3) Provide a sensitivity table of equity IRR vs exit multiple (9.5x / 10.5x / 11.5x) and exit-year EBITDA margin (16% / 17% / 18%). 4) List 5 underwriting risks and 5 concrete downside protection levers. Keep it concise, but show the math clearly.

Z.ai: GLM 5
Response

glm-5 logo
Z.ai: GLM 5Mini LBO Underwrite
glm-5 logo
Z.ai: GLM 5

1. Sources & Uses (Entry at End FY2025)

Uses

  • Purchase Price: $1,440.0m (12.0x $120m EBITDA)
  • Transaction Fees: $28.8m (2.0% of EV)
  • Total Uses: $1,468.8m

Sources

  • Term Loan: $480.0m (4.0x EBITDA)
  • Mezzanine: $180.0m (1.5x EBITDA)
  • Total Debt: $660.0m (5.5x EBITDA)
  • Equity: $808.8m (Plug)
  • Total Sources: $1,468.8m

2. Year-by-Year Financial Model (FY2026–FY2030)

Assumptions Applied:

  • Rev Growth: 8% → 7% → 6% → 5% → 5%
  • EBITDA Margin: 14.0% → 17.0%
  • Tax Base: EBITDA - Cash Interest.
  • Amortization: 1% of Original TL Principal ($4.8m/yr).
  • Optional Paydown: All FCF after mandatory amort goes to Term Loan.
Metric ($m)FY2026FY2027FY2028FY2029FY2030
Revenue$972.0$1,040.0$1,102.4$1,157.5$1,215.4
EBITDA$136.1$156.0$176.4$191.0$206.6
Margin %14.0%15.0%16.0%16.5%17.0%
Cash Interest:
- Term Loan (9.0%)($43.2)($41.3)($38.0)($33.2)($27.3)
- Mezzanine (12.0%)($21.6)($22.0)($22.5)($22.9)($23.4)
Total Cash Int.($64.8)($63.3)($60.5)($56.1)($50.7)
Cash Taxes (25%)($17.8)($23.2)($29.0)($33.7)($39.0)
Capex($29.2)($31.2)($33.1)($34.7)($36.5)
ΔNWC($3.6)($0.3)($0.3)($0.3)($0.3)
Free Cash Flow$15.9$31.8$48.7$61.3$75.4
Mandatory Amort($4.8)($4.8)($4.8)($4.8)($4.8)
Optional TL Paydown($11.1)($27.0)($43.9)($56.5)($70.6)
Ending Balances:
Term Loan$464.1$432.3$383.6$322.3$246.9
Mezzanine (w/ PIK)$183.6$187.3$191.0$194.8$198.7
Total Net Debt$647.7$619.6$574.6$517.1$445.6

(Note: Mezzanine balance grows by 2.0% PIK annually. Term Loan interest calculated on beginning balance for simplicity, consistent with "simplified" instruction.)


3. Returns Analysis (Exit End FY2030)

Exit Valuation

  • Exit EBITDA: $206.6m
  • Exit Multiple: 10.5x
  • Enterprise Value: $2,169.5m
  • Less Exit Fees: ($21.7m) (1.0% of EV)
  • Less Total Debt: ($445.6m) (TL $246.9m + Mezz $198.7m)
  • Net Equity Value: $1,702.2m

Returns

  • Initial Equity: $808.8m
  • MOIC: 2.1x ($1,702.2m / $808.8m)
  • IRR: 16.0%

4. Sensitivity Analysis (Equity IRR)

Exit Multiple16.0% Margin17.0% Margin (Base)18.0% Margin
9.5x11.6%13.5%15.3%
10.5x14.5%16.0%17.5%
11.5x17.2%19.0%20.7%

5. Underwriting Risks & Downside Protection

Top 5 Risks:

  1. Multiple Contraction: Entry at 12.0x vs Exit at 10.5x creates a significant valuation headwind; the investment relies heavily on EBITDA growth to offset the multiple decline.
  2. Execution Risk: The plan requires expanding EBITDA margin from 13.3% to 17.0% in 5 years; failure to achieve operational efficiencies (scale, routing, purchasing) will crush returns.
  3. Interest Rate Volatility: The Term Loan is floating rate; a sustained 200bps rate increase would significantly reduce free cash flow available for deleveraging.
  4. Customer Concentration: "Data centers" implies a concentrated customer base (hyperscalers); loss of a single major contract could materially impact revenue.
  5. Refinancing Risk: Mezzanine debt is expensive (14%+ all-in); if the credit markets are closed in Years 3–4, the company cannot refinance to lower interest costs, dampening equity value.

Top 5 Downside Protection Levers:

  1. Recurring Revenue Base: Mission-critical maintenance contracts for data centers are non-discretionary and highly sticky, providing downside revenue protection.
  2. Aggressive Deleveraging: The model generates ~$230m of cumulative FCF for debt paydown, reducing Net Debt from $660m to ~$446m, significantly lowering the equity breakeven point.
  3. Margin Floor: Even if margin expansion fails, the business generates strong cash flow; at a constant 13.3% margin, the company still pays down debt, providing a cushion.
  4. Asset Liquidity: HVAC service platforms are attractive to strategic buyers (e.g., HVAC manufacturers, facility management firms), providing an alternative exit path if financial sponsors are absent.
  5. NWC Efficiency: The minimal NWC requirements (0.5% of incremental revenue) ensure cash flow conversion is high, preventing cash from being trapped in working capital during growth.
Mini LBO Underwrite

Turn this model response into notes, narration, or a short video

Auto NotesTranscriptNarrateVideo Cut

Partner link

This output is part of our open dataset — 5K+ AI responses across 200 models

About Z.ai: GLM 5

Capabilities

ConversationReasoningCode GenerationAnalysisAgentic Tool UseTool Use

Categories

TextCode

Specifications

Provider
Zhipu
Released
2026-02-11
Size
XLARGE
Context
202,752 tokens

Keep exploring

SAME PROMPT

Claude Sonnet 4.6's version

Same prompt, different result

COMPARE

Z.ai: GLM 5 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

Both outputs, side by side

Compare AI vibes, not scores. Side-by-side outputs across the world's best models.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Leaderboard
  • Challenges

Discover

  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • .llmignore
  • Badges
  • RIVAL Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival