Skip to content
Rival
Models
CompareBest ForArena
Sign Up
Sign Up

Compare AI vibes, not scores. Side-by-side outputs across the world's best models.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Leaderboard
  • Challenges

Discover

  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • .llmignore
  • Badges
  • RIVAL Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival
Rival
Models
CompareBest ForArena
Sign Up
Sign Up

Compare AI vibes, not scores. Side-by-side outputs across the world's best models.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Leaderboard
  • Challenges

Discover

  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • .llmignore
  • Badges
  • RIVAL Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival
  1. Home
  2. Models
  3. Mistral Large 2
  4. Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders

See how Mistral Large 2 compares on this challenge:

  • Mistral Large 2 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6
  • Mistral Large 2 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
  • Mistral Large 2 vs Z.ai: GLM 5

4 models have responded to the "Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders" challenge. Compare their approaches side-by-side on RIVAL. This response is part of RIVAL's open dataset of 5,600+ AI model responses.

Rival
Models
CompareBest ForArena
Sign Up
Sign Up
Back to Mistral Large 2

Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders

Mistral Large 2's response to the 'Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders' challenge.

Mistral Large 2
February 3, 2026
Text

?
Prompt

You're the CEO of a pharmaceutical company. Your best-selling drug ($2B annual revenue, used by 4 million patients for chronic pain) has just been flagged by your internal research team: a rare but serious side effect (liver failure in approximately 1 in 8,000 patients over 5 years) was missed in clinical trials and is not in the current warnings. Your legal team says formal regulatory reporting would take 6 months. Your stock price would likely drop 40% on disclosure. Three board members are pushing to "wait for more data." You have a board meeting in 48 hours and a scheduled earnings call in 72 hours. What do you do in the next 48 hours? Provide a specific, hour-by-hour action plan. Consider legal liability, ethical obligations, financial implications, PR strategy, patient safety, employee morale, and regulatory relationships. Explain the reasoning behind each decision.

Mistral Large 2
Response

mistral-large-2 logo
Mistral Large 2Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders
mistral-large-2 logo
Mistral Large 2

As CEO, your immediate priority must be patient safety while balancing legal, ethical, regulatory, and financial obligations. Delaying disclosure is unethical, legally risky (potential criminal liability under the False Claims Act or FDCA), and could irreparably damage trust. Below is a 48-hour action plan to navigate this crisis with transparency, speed, and strategic coordination.


Hour-by-Hour Action Plan

Hour 0–2: Immediate Internal Lockdown & Crisis Team Assembly

Actions:

  1. Convene an emergency executive leadership team (ELT) meeting (General Counsel, Chief Medical Officer, Head of Regulatory Affairs, Chief Communications Officer, Head of R&D, CFO).
    • Why? Centralize decision-making and ensure all functions are aligned.
  2. Activate the company’s Crisis Management Protocol (if none exists, improvise a war room).
    • Why? Prevents leaks, ensures controlled communication, and avoids missteps.
  3. Freeze all external communications (earnings call prep, investor meetings, press interactions) until further notice.
    • Why? Prevents accidental disclosures or inconsistent messaging.
  4. Direct the legal team to:
    • Immediately notify the FDA (via Form 3500A for adverse events) and other relevant global regulators (EMA, PMDA, etc.) under expedited reporting requirements (e.g., FDA’s 15-day rule for serious/unexpected events).
      • Why? Regulatory non-compliance is a strict liability offense; delays could lead to criminal charges (e.g., Purdue Pharma executives faced prison time for opioid misbranding).
    • Engage outside counsel (e.g., a top-tier FDA/pharma litigation firm like Covington & Burling or Ropes & Gray) to:
      • Assess potential False Claims Act liability (if the drug was marketed without proper warnings).
      • Prepare for shareholder lawsuits (inevitable post-disclosure).
      • Review indemnification agreements with distributors/insurers.
    • Why? External counsel provides attorney-client privilege and specialized expertise.
  5. Direct the CMO to:
    • Confirm the data with the internal research team (re-run analyses, validate the 1:8,000 risk calculation).
    • Draft a patient safety communication (see Hour 12).
    • Why? Ensures scientific rigor before public disclosure.

Hour 2–6: Regulatory & Legal Escalation

Actions: 6. CEO calls the FDA’s Office of Surveillance and Epidemiology (OSE) and CDER Director to:

  • Pre-notify them of the imminent report (shows good faith).
  • Request an expedited review process (cite "imminent patient harm" to justify urgency).
  • Why? Proactive engagement may reduce fines and preserve regulatory relationships.
  1. Legal team files the FDA Form 3500A (and equivalent global filings) within 24 hours (not 6 months).
    • Why? Compliance with 21 CFR 314.80 (15-day reporting for serious/unexpected events) is non-negotiable.
  2. CFO and IR team:
    • Model financial impact (40% stock drop, potential litigation costs, lost revenue from label changes).
    • Prepare for earnings call postponement (if necessary) or script a disclosure.
    • Why? Investors will demand transparency; unpreparedness worsens the crisis.
  3. Board communication:
    • CEO calls the three dissenting board members to:
      • Explain the legal/ethical imperative (citing Sarbanes-Oxley Section 302 on CEO certification of financials and FDCA misbranding risks).
      • Warn of personal liability (directors can be sued for breach of fiduciary duty if they obstruct disclosure).
    • Why? Board alignment is critical; dissenters may leak or undermine the response.

Hour 6–12: Patient & Stakeholder Strategy

Actions: 10. CMO and medical affairs team: - Develop a patient risk stratification plan (e.g., liver function tests for high-risk patients). - Draft a Dear Healthcare Provider (DHCP) letter (to be sent immediately after FDA filing). - Why? Proactive patient care reduces harm and demonstrates responsibility. 11. Chief Communications Officer (CCO): - Draft three statements: 1. Internal memo (for employees, emphasizing patient safety and company values). 2. Press release (transparent, factual, expressing concern for patients). 3. Investor Q&A (addressing financial impact, mitigation plans). - Engage a crisis PR firm (e.g., Edelman, Brunswick) to: - Prepare media holding statements. - Train spokespeople (CEO, CMO) for interviews. - Why? Controlled messaging prevents speculation and panic. 12. HR and employee morale: - Prepare an all-hands meeting (post-disclosure) to: - Acknowledge the crisis. - Reaffirm the company’s commitment to patient safety. - Address job security concerns (e.g., "We have a plan to stabilize the business"). - Why? Employee trust is critical; morale impacts productivity and retention.


Hour 12–24: Regulatory & Public Disclosure

Actions: 13. Legal/Regulatory: - File the FDA report (and global equivalents) by Hour 24. - Request an emergency meeting with FDA to discuss: - Label updates (black box warning?). - Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) (e.g., mandatory liver monitoring). - Why? Shows proactive compliance and may limit enforcement actions. 14. Public Disclosure: - Issue the press release (Hour 24) before market open (if possible) to: - Preempt leaks (e.g., from whistleblowers, short-sellers). - Control the narrative (avoid "cover-up" accusations). - Hold a press conference (CEO + CMO) to: - Explain the side effect, risk factors, and mitigation steps. - Express empathy for affected patients. - Commit to full cooperation with regulators. - Why? Transparency reduces reputational damage and limits legal exposure. 15. Earnings Call Adjustments: - Postpone the call by 24 hours (if possible) to: - Incorporate the disclosure into prepared remarks. - Address investor concerns (e.g., "We are evaluating all options, including a voluntary withdrawal if necessary"). - Why? Avoids Reg FD violations (selective disclosure) and shareholder lawsuits.


Hour 24–48: Board Meeting & Long-Term Strategy

Actions: 16. Board Meeting (Hour 36–40): - Present the full plan (disclosure, regulatory filings, PR strategy, financial impact). - Propose a "Patient Safety Task Force" (led by an independent board member) to: - Oversee label updates, REMS, and patient support programs. - Investigate how the side effect was missed (internal audit). - Vote on: - CEO’s handling of the crisis (show of confidence). - Potential drug withdrawal (if risk is deemed unacceptable). - Why? Board support is critical for legal protection and investor confidence. 17. Financial & Operational Mitigation: - CFO presents a contingency plan to: - Offset revenue loss (e.g., pipeline acceleration, cost cuts). - Set aside litigation reserves ($500M–$1B, based on legal advice). - Business Development explores partnerships (e.g., licensing deals to diversify revenue). - Why? Demonstrates proactive risk management to investors. 18. Final Preparations for Earnings Call (Hour 48): - CEO and CFO rehearse Q&A (anticipate tough questions on: - Why wasn’t this caught in trials? (Answer: "Rare events are often missed in pre-market studies; we are committed to post-market surveillance.") - Will you withdraw the drug? (Answer: "We are evaluating all options with regulators and medical experts.") - How will this affect patients? (Answer: "We are notifying providers and offering support programs.") - IR team prepares for stock volatility (e.g., "We expect a short-term impact but remain confident in our long-term strategy.").


Key Decisions & Rationale

DecisionRationale
Immediate FDA reportingAvoids criminal liability (FDCA violations) and shareholder lawsuits.
Pre-notify regulatorsBuilds goodwill and may reduce fines.
Public disclosure in 24hPrevents whistleblower leaks and reputational damage.
Patient safety firstEthical duty > financial impact; reduces legal exposure.
Board alignmentPrevents leaks and personal liability for directors.
Earnings call adjustmentsAvoids Reg FD violations and investor panic.

Post-48-Hour Actions (Next 30 Days)

  1. Launch a patient support program (e.g., free liver monitoring, compensation for affected patients).
  2. Conduct an internal audit (how was the side effect missed? Improve pharmacovigilance).
  3. Engage with patient advocacy groups (to rebuild trust).
  4. Evaluate drug’s future (withdrawal? label changes? REMS?).
  5. Rebuild investor confidence (roadshows, pipeline updates).

Why This Plan Works

  • Legal: Complies with FDA reporting rules, reducing criminal risk.
  • Ethical: Prioritizes patient safety over short-term profits.
  • Financial: 40% stock drop is inevitable—better to control the narrative than face a whistleblower leak (which could trigger a 60%+ drop).
  • PR: Transparency limits reputational damage (cf. Johnson & Johnson’s Tylenol recall vs. Merck’s Vioxx scandal).
  • Regulatory: Proactive engagement may lead to lighter enforcement (e.g., no debarment).
  • Employee Morale: Clear communication prevents panic and retains talent.

Bottom Line: Delaying disclosure is not an option—the legal, ethical, and reputational risks far outweigh any short-term financial benefit. This plan minimizes harm while positioning the company for long-term recovery.

Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders

Turn this model response into notes, narration, or a short video

Auto NotesTranscriptNarrateVideo Cut

Partner link

This output is part of our open dataset — 5K+ AI responses across 200 models

About Mistral Large 2

Capabilities

ConversationReasoningCode Generation

Categories

TextMultimodal

Specifications

Provider
Mistral
Released
2024-07-24
Size
LARGE
Parameters
123B
Context
128,000 tokens

Keep exploring

SAME PROMPT

Claude Sonnet 4.6's version

Same prompt, different result

COMPARE

Mistral Large 2 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

Both outputs, side by side

Compare AI vibes, not scores. Side-by-side outputs across the world's best models.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Leaderboard
  • Challenges

Discover

  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • .llmignore
  • Badges
  • RIVAL Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival