4 models have responded to the "Mini LBO Underwrite" challenge. Compare their approaches side-by-side on RIVAL. This response is part of RIVAL's open dataset of 5,600+ AI model responses.
Qwen3 Coder Next's response to the 'Mini LBO Underwrite' challenge.
You are underwriting a 5-year LBO for a private equity investment committee. Company (fictional): HarborTech Services (HTS) – mission-critical HVAC maintenance + monitoring for data centers (mostly recurring service contracts). Use only the information below. Do NOT browse the web. This is a fictional exercise. ENTRY (close at end of FY2025) - FY2025 revenue: $900m - FY2025 EBITDA: $120m (13.3% margin) - Purchase price: 12.0x EBITDA - Transaction fees: 2.0% of enterprise value (paid at close, funded by equity) SOURCES & USES (simplified) - Total leverage at close: 5.5x EBITDA - Term Loan: 4.0x EBITDA, 9.0% cash interest, 1.0% annual amortization - Mezzanine: 1.5x EBITDA, 12.0% cash interest + 2.0% PIK (PIK accrues to principal) - Equity funds the remainder - Assume starting cash is $0. - Assume all free cash flow after required payments is used for optional Term Loan paydown (no dividends). OPERATING ASSUMPTIONS (FY2026–FY2030) Base case: - Revenue growth: 8%, 7%, 6%, 5%, 5% - EBITDA margin: 14.0%, 15.0%, 16.0%, 16.5%, 17.0% - Capex: 3.0% of revenue - Change in NWC: 0.5% of incremental revenue (cash outflow) - Cash tax rate: 25% applied to max(0, EBITDA - cash interest) (simplified) EXIT (end of FY2030) - Exit multiple: 10.5x FY2030 EBITDA - Exit fees: 1.0% of enterprise value - Mezzanine (including PIK) is repaid at exit. TASK 1) Build a simplified year-by-year table (FY2026–FY2030) with: revenue, EBITDA, cash interest (by tranche), cash taxes, capex, ΔNWC, free cash flow after debt service, and ending debt balances (Term Loan + Mezz). 2) Compute equity IRR and MOIC. 3) Provide a sensitivity table of equity IRR vs exit multiple (9.5x / 10.5x / 11.5x) and exit-year EBITDA margin (16% / 17% / 18%). 4) List 5 underwriting risks and 5 concrete downside protection levers. Keep it concise, but show the math clearly.
Let’s build the LBO model step-by-step using only the provided data.
EBITDA (FY2025): $120m
Purchase Price (12.0x): $120m × 12.0 = $1,440m
Transaction Fees (2.0% of EV): 0.02 × $1,440m = $28.8m
Total Use of Funds: $1,440m + $28.8m = $1,468.8m
Debt at Close (5.5x EBITDA):
Equity Required: $1,468.8m – $660.0m = $808.8m
Note: Starting cash = $0. All FCF after debt service goes to optional Term Loan paydown.
Let’s compute year-by-year.
Note: At exit (end FY2030), all debt is repaid (including Mezz with PIK).
So, Term Loan repaid at exit = $216.98 (optional paydown already done), Mezz repaid = $198.74.
| FY | Revenue | EBITDA | Cash Int (Term) | Cash Int (Mezz) | Cash Taxes | Capex | ΔNWC | FCF After Debt Serv. | Term Loan End | Mezz End |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | $972.0 | $136.08 | $43.20 | $21.60 | $17.82 | $29.16 | $0.36 | $23.94 | $456.06 | $183.60 |
| 2027 | $1,040.0 | $156.01 | $41.05 | $22.03 | $23.23 | $31.20 | $0.34 | $38.16 | $417.90 | $187.27 |
| 2028 | $1,102.4 | $176.39 | $37.61 | $22.47 | $29.08 | $33.07 | $0.31 | $53.85 | $364.05 | $191.02 |
| 2029 | $1,157.6 | $191.00 | $32.76 | $22.92 | $33.83 | $34.73 | $0.28 | $66.48 | $297.57 | $194.84 |
| 2030 | $1,215.4 | $206.62 | $26.78 | $23.38 | $39.12 | $36.46 | $0.29 | $80.59 | $216.98 | $198.74 |
(Rounded to 2 decimals; FCF used to pay down Term Loan each year.)
= 0.01 × $2,169.51 = $21.70m
= Exit EV – Exit Fees – Debt Repaid
= $2,169.51 – $21.70 – ($216.98 + $198.74)
= $2,169.51 – $21.70 – $415.72
= $1,732.09m
= $808.80m (at close)
= $1,732.09 / $808.80 = 2.14x
✅ Base Case IRR ≈ 16.5% | MOIC ≈ 2.14x
We vary:
Note: Changing EBITDA margin affects FY2030 EBITDA (and thus all prior years’ growth/interest/taxes, but for simplicity, we’ll only adjust FY2030 EBITDA — a common first-order sensitivity assumption).
Recalculate exit equity value (all else equal):
| Exit Multiple | 16% Margin | 17% Margin (Base) | 18% Margin |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9.5x | $1,573.61 → IRR = 12.1% | $1,732.09 → 16.5% | $1,890.57 → IRR = 20.6% |
| 10.5x | $1,732.09 → IRR = 16.5% | $1,906.01 → 18.7% | $2,079.93 → IRR = 22.5% |
| 11.5x | $1,890.57 → IRR = 20.6% | $2,079.93 → 22.5% | $2,269.29 → IRR = 26.1% |
*Calculations:
Turn this model response into notes, narration, or a short video
Partner link