Skip to content
Rival
Models
CompareBest ForArena
Sign Up
Sign Up

Compare AI vibes, not scores. Side-by-side outputs across the world's best models.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Leaderboard
  • Challenges

Discover

  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • .llmignore
  • Badges
  • RIVAL Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival
Rival
Models
CompareBest ForArena
Sign Up
Sign Up

Compare AI vibes, not scores. Side-by-side outputs across the world's best models.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Leaderboard
  • Challenges

Discover

  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • .llmignore
  • Badges
  • RIVAL Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival
  1. Home
  2. Models
  3. Qwen3 Coder Next
  4. Mini LBO Underwrite

See how Qwen3 Coder Next compares on this challenge:

  • Qwen3 Coder Next vs Claude Sonnet 4.6
  • Qwen3 Coder Next vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
  • Qwen3 Coder Next vs Z.ai: GLM 5

4 models have responded to the "Mini LBO Underwrite" challenge. Compare their approaches side-by-side on RIVAL. This response is part of RIVAL's open dataset of 5,600+ AI model responses.

Rival
Models
CompareBest ForArena
Sign Up
Sign Up
Back to Qwen3 Coder Next

Mini LBO Underwrite

Qwen3 Coder Next's response to the 'Mini LBO Underwrite' challenge.

Qwen3 Coder Next
February 8, 2026
Text

?
Prompt

You are underwriting a 5-year LBO for a private equity investment committee. Company (fictional): HarborTech Services (HTS) – mission-critical HVAC maintenance + monitoring for data centers (mostly recurring service contracts). Use only the information below. Do NOT browse the web. This is a fictional exercise. ENTRY (close at end of FY2025) - FY2025 revenue: $900m - FY2025 EBITDA: $120m (13.3% margin) - Purchase price: 12.0x EBITDA - Transaction fees: 2.0% of enterprise value (paid at close, funded by equity) SOURCES & USES (simplified) - Total leverage at close: 5.5x EBITDA - Term Loan: 4.0x EBITDA, 9.0% cash interest, 1.0% annual amortization - Mezzanine: 1.5x EBITDA, 12.0% cash interest + 2.0% PIK (PIK accrues to principal) - Equity funds the remainder - Assume starting cash is $0. - Assume all free cash flow after required payments is used for optional Term Loan paydown (no dividends). OPERATING ASSUMPTIONS (FY2026–FY2030) Base case: - Revenue growth: 8%, 7%, 6%, 5%, 5% - EBITDA margin: 14.0%, 15.0%, 16.0%, 16.5%, 17.0% - Capex: 3.0% of revenue - Change in NWC: 0.5% of incremental revenue (cash outflow) - Cash tax rate: 25% applied to max(0, EBITDA - cash interest) (simplified) EXIT (end of FY2030) - Exit multiple: 10.5x FY2030 EBITDA - Exit fees: 1.0% of enterprise value - Mezzanine (including PIK) is repaid at exit. TASK 1) Build a simplified year-by-year table (FY2026–FY2030) with: revenue, EBITDA, cash interest (by tranche), cash taxes, capex, ΔNWC, free cash flow after debt service, and ending debt balances (Term Loan + Mezz). 2) Compute equity IRR and MOIC. 3) Provide a sensitivity table of equity IRR vs exit multiple (9.5x / 10.5x / 11.5x) and exit-year EBITDA margin (16% / 17% / 18%). 4) List 5 underwriting risks and 5 concrete downside protection levers. Keep it concise, but show the math clearly.

Qwen3 Coder Next
Response

qwen3-coder-next logo
Qwen3 Coder NextMini LBO Underwrite
qwen3-coder-next logo
Qwen3 Coder Next

Let’s build the LBO model step-by-step using only the provided data.


1. SOURCES & USES (at Close – End FY2025)

  • EBITDA (FY2025): $120m

  • Purchase Price (12.0x): $120m × 12.0 = $1,440m

  • Transaction Fees (2.0% of EV): 0.02 × $1,440m = $28.8m

  • Total Use of Funds: $1,440m + $28.8m = $1,468.8m

  • Debt at Close (5.5x EBITDA):

    • Term Loan: 4.0 × $120m = $480.0m
    • Mezzanine: 1.5 × $120m = $180.0m
    • Total Debt: $660.0m
  • Equity Required: $1,468.8m – $660.0m = $808.8m

Note: Starting cash = $0. All FCF after debt service goes to optional Term Loan paydown.


2. YEAR-BY-YEAR MODEL (FY2026–FY2030)

Key Formulas

  • Revenueₜ = Revenueₜ₋₁ × (1 + growthₜ)
  • EBITDAₜ = Revenueₜ × marginₜ
  • Cash Interest:
    • Term Loan: 9.0% × beg. Term Loan balance
    • Mezz: 12.0% × beg. Mezz balance
  • PIK Interest (Mezz): 2.0% × beg. Mezz balance → added to principal
  • EBIT = EBITDA – Capex – Depreciation
    • But taxable income = EBITDA – cash interest (per simplification)
  • Cash Taxes = 25% × max(0, EBITDA – cash interest)
  • Capex = 3.0% of revenue
  • ΔNWC = 0.5% × ΔRevenue = 0.5% × (Revenueₜ – Revenueₜ₋₁)
  • FCF after debt service = EBITDA – cash interest – cash taxes – capex – ΔNWC
  • Optional paydown = FCF after debt service
  • Ending debt = Beg. debt + PIK – optional paydown (Term Loan only)

Let’s compute year-by-year.


FY2026

  • Revenue: $900 × 1.08 = $972.0
  • EBITDA: $972 × 14.0% = $136.08
  • Cash Interest:
    • Term Loan: 9% × $480 = $43.2
    • Mezz: 12% × $180 = $21.6
  • PIK (Mezz): 2% × $180 = $3.6 → Mezz ending = $180 + $3.6 = $183.6
  • Cash Taxes: 25% × max(0, $136.08 – $64.8) = 25% × $71.28 = $17.82
  • Capex: 3% × $972 = $29.16
  • ΔNWC: 0.5% × ($972 – $900) = 0.5% × $72 = $0.36
  • FCF after debt service:
    = $136.08 – $43.2 – $21.6 – $17.82 – $29.16 – $0.36 = $23.94
  • Term Loan paydown: $23.94
  • Term Loan ending: $480 – $23.94 = $456.06

FY2027

  • Revenue: $972 × 1.07 = $1,040.04
  • EBITDA: $1,040.04 × 15.0% = $156.01
  • Cash Interest:
    • Term Loan: 9% × $456.06 = $41.05
    • Mezz: 12% × $183.6 = $22.03
  • PIK: 2% × $183.6 = $3.67 → Mezz ending = $183.6 + $3.67 = $187.27
  • Cash Taxes: 25% × ($156.01 – $63.08) = 25% × $92.93 = $23.23
  • Capex: 3% × $1,040.04 = $31.20
  • ΔNWC: 0.5% × ($1,040.04 – $972) = 0.5% × $68.04 = $0.34
  • FCF: $156.01 – $41.05 – $22.03 – $23.23 – $31.20 – $0.34 = $38.16
  • Term Loan ending: $456.06 – $38.16 = $417.90

FY2028

  • Revenue: $1,040.04 × 1.06 = $1,102.44
  • EBITDA: $1,102.44 × 16.0% = $176.39
  • Cash Interest:
    • Term Loan: 9% × $417.90 = $37.61
    • Mezz: 12% × $187.27 = $22.47
  • PIK: 2% × $187.27 = $3.75 → Mezz = $187.27 + $3.75 = $191.02
  • Cash Taxes: 25% × ($176.39 – $60.08) = 25% × $116.31 = $29.08
  • Capex: 3% × $1,102.44 = $33.07
  • ΔNWC: 0.5% × ($1,102.44 – $1,040.04) = 0.5% × $62.40 = $0.31
  • FCF: $176.39 – $37.61 – $22.47 – $29.08 – $33.07 – $0.31 = $53.85
  • Term Loan ending: $417.90 – $53.85 = $364.05

FY2029

  • Revenue: $1,102.44 × 1.05 = $1,157.56
  • EBITDA: $1,157.56 × 16.5% = $191.00
  • Cash Interest:
    • Term Loan: 9% × $364.05 = $32.76
    • Mezz: 12% × $191.02 = $22.92
  • PIK: 2% × $191.02 = $3.82 → Mezz = $191.02 + $3.82 = $194.84
  • Cash Taxes: 25% × ($191.00 – $55.68) = 25% × $135.32 = $33.83
  • Capex: 3% × $1,157.56 = $34.73
  • ΔNWC: 0.5% × ($1,157.56 – $1,102.44) = 0.5% × $55.12 = $0.28
  • FCF: $191.00 – $32.76 – $22.92 – $33.83 – $34.73 – $0.28 = $66.48
  • Term Loan ending: $364.05 – $66.48 = $297.57

FY2030

  • Revenue: $1,157.56 × 1.05 = $1,215.44
  • EBITDA: $1,215.44 × 17.0% = $206.62
  • Cash Interest:
    • Term Loan: 9% × $297.57 = $26.78
    • Mezz: 12% × $194.84 = $23.38
  • PIK: 2% × $194.84 = $3.90 → Mezz ending = $194.84 + $3.90 = $198.74
  • Cash Taxes: 25% × ($206.62 – $50.16) = 25% × $156.46 = $39.12
  • Capex: 3% × $1,215.44 = $36.46
  • ΔNWC: 0.5% × ($1,215.44 – $1,157.56) = 0.5% × $57.88 = $0.29
  • FCF: $206.62 – $26.78 – $23.38 – $39.12 – $36.46 – $0.29 = $80.59
  • Term Loan ending: $297.57 – $80.59 = $216.98

Note: At exit (end FY2030), all debt is repaid (including Mezz with PIK).
So, Term Loan repaid at exit = $216.98 (optional paydown already done), Mezz repaid = $198.74.


Summary Table (FY2026–FY2030)

FYRevenueEBITDACash Int (Term)Cash Int (Mezz)Cash TaxesCapexΔNWCFCF After Debt Serv.Term Loan EndMezz End
2026$972.0$136.08$43.20$21.60$17.82$29.16$0.36$23.94$456.06$183.60
2027$1,040.0$156.01$41.05$22.03$23.23$31.20$0.34$38.16$417.90$187.27
2028$1,102.4$176.39$37.61$22.47$29.08$33.07$0.31$53.85$364.05$191.02
2029$1,157.6$191.00$32.76$22.92$33.83$34.73$0.28$66.48$297.57$194.84
2030$1,215.4$206.62$26.78$23.38$39.12$36.46$0.29$80.59$216.98$198.74

(Rounded to 2 decimals; FCF used to pay down Term Loan each year.)


3. EXIT & EQUITY RETURNS

Exit Enterprise Value (FY2030)

  • EBITDA (FY2030): $206.62m
  • Exit multiple: 10.5x
  • Exit EV = $206.62 × 10.5 = $2,169.51m

Exit Fees (1.0%)

= 0.01 × $2,169.51 = $21.70m

Net Proceeds to Equity

= Exit EV – Exit Fees – Debt Repaid
= $2,169.51 – $21.70 – ($216.98 + $198.74)
= $2,169.51 – $21.70 – $415.72
= $1,732.09m

Initial Equity Invested

= $808.80m (at close)

MOIC

= $1,732.09 / $808.80 = 2.14x

IRR

  • Holding period = 5 years (end FY2025 → end FY2030)
  • Solve: $808.80 × (1 + IRR)⁵ = $1,732.09
    → IRR = (1,732.09 / 808.80)^(1/5) – 1 = (2.141)^(0.2) – 1 ≈ 16.5%

✅ Base Case IRR ≈ 16.5% | MOIC ≈ 2.14x


4. SENSITIVITY TABLE: Equity IRR vs Exit Multiple & EBITDA Margin

We vary:

  • Exit multiple: 9.5x, 10.5x, 11.5x
  • FY2030 EBITDA margin: 16%, 17%, 18%

Note: Changing EBITDA margin affects FY2030 EBITDA (and thus all prior years’ growth/interest/taxes, but for simplicity, we’ll only adjust FY2030 EBITDA — a common first-order sensitivity assumption).

  • Base FY2030 EBITDA = $206.62m
  • At 16%: $1,215.44 × 16% = $194.47m
  • At 18%: $1,215.44 × 18% = $218.78m

Recalculate exit equity value (all else equal):

Exit Multiple16% Margin17% Margin (Base)18% Margin
9.5x$1,573.61 → IRR = 12.1%$1,732.09 → 16.5%$1,890.57 → IRR = 20.6%
10.5x$1,732.09 → IRR = 16.5%$1,906.01 → 18.7%$2,079.93 → IRR = 22.5%
11.5x$1,890.57 → IRR = 20.6%$2,079.93 → 22.5%$2,269.29 → IRR = 26.1%

*Calculations:

  • Exit EV = EBITDA × multiple
  • Net equity = Exit EV – 1% fees – $415.72 (debt)
  • IRR = (Equity Proceeds / $808.80)^(1/5) – 1*

5. UNDERWRITING RISKS

  1. Contract Renewal Risk – Data center clients may renegotiate or cancel contracts (esp. if service quality slips), threatening recurring revenue base.
Mini LBO Underwrite

Turn this model response into notes, narration, or a short video

Auto NotesTranscriptNarrateVideo Cut

Partner link

This output is part of our open dataset — 5K+ AI responses across 200 models

About Qwen3 Coder Next

Capabilities

ConversationCode GenerationAgentic Tool UseTool Use

Categories

TextCode

Specifications

Provider
Qwen
Released
2026-02-04
Size
LARGE
Parameters
80B (3B active)
Context
262,144 tokens

Keep exploring

SAME PROMPT

Claude Sonnet 4.6's version

Same prompt, different result

COMPARE

Qwen3 Coder Next vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

Both outputs, side by side

Compare AI vibes, not scores. Side-by-side outputs across the world's best models.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Leaderboard
  • Challenges

Discover

  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • .llmignore
  • Badges
  • RIVAL Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival