Skip to content
Rival
Models
CompareBest ForArena
Sign Up
Sign Up

Compare AI vibes, not scores. Side-by-side outputs across the world's best models.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Leaderboard
  • Challenges

Discover

  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • .llmignore
  • Badges
  • RIVAL Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival
Rival
Models
CompareBest ForArena
Sign Up
Sign Up

Compare AI vibes, not scores. Side-by-side outputs across the world's best models.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Leaderboard
  • Challenges

Discover

  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • .llmignore
  • Badges
  • RIVAL Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival
  1. Home
  2. Models
  3. Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking
  4. Debug This Architecture

See how Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking compares on this challenge:

  • Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking vs Claude Sonnet 4.6
  • Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
  • Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking vs Z.ai: GLM 5

4 models have responded to the "Debug This Architecture" challenge. Compare their approaches side-by-side on RIVAL. This response is part of RIVAL's open dataset of 5,600+ AI model responses.

Rival
Models
CompareBest ForArena
Sign Up
Sign Up
Back to Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking

Debug This Architecture

Qwen3 Max Thinking's response to the 'Debug This Architecture' challenge.

Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking
February 9, 2026
Text

?
Prompt

Here's the architecture for a real-time collaborative document editor (like Google Docs): **System Overview:** - Frontend: React SPA with WebSocket connections - Backend: Node.js API servers behind a load balancer (round-robin) - Database: PostgreSQL for document storage, Redis for session cache - Real-time: Each API server maintains its own WebSocket connections to clients - Sync Strategy: Last-write-wins with timestamps from client clocks - Storage: Documents saved as full HTML snapshots every 30 seconds - Auth: JWT tokens with 24-hour expiry, stored in localStorage - CDN: CloudFront for static assets, also caches API responses for 5 minutes **Data Flow:** 1. User types → change event sent via WebSocket to their connected server 2. Server writes change to PostgreSQL 3. Server broadcasts change to all WebSocket clients connected to THAT server 4. Other servers poll PostgreSQL every 2 seconds for changes 5. Conflict resolution: if two users edit the same paragraph, last timestamp wins **Scaling Plan:** - Horizontal scaling by adding more API servers - Database read replicas for read-heavy operations - Document partitioning by organization ID Identify all potential failure modes, race conditions, and scaling bottlenecks in this architecture. For each issue found, propose a specific solution with trade-offs.

Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking
Response

qwen3-max-thinking logo
Qwen: Qwen3 Max ThinkingDebug This Architecture
qwen3-max-thinking logo
Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking

Critical Flaws in Proposed Architecture & Targeted Solutions

🔒 Security & Authentication

IssueImpactSolutionTrade-offs
JWT Stored in localStorageCritical XSS vulnerability (token exposure via JS).Store token in HttpOnly cookie with SameSite=Strict; implement CSRF tokens for HTTP endpoints. Use short-lived access (<5min) + refresh tokens.Adds CSRF complexity; requires secure cookie handling.
Unvalidated WebSocket AuthUnauthorized users could inject edits or spy on docs.Authenticate at WebSocket upgrade using validated JWT. Cache user permissions on connection; verify document access on every message.Adds latency at connection; requires permission cache invalidation.
CDN Caches Mutable API Responses (5-min TTL)Users see stale documents; breaks real-time collaboration.Disable CDN caching for dynamic APIs (use Cache-Control: private, no-cache). Serve static assets via CDN only.Increases API server load; mitigated by read replicas + edge caching of static assets.

⚖️ Consensus & Data Integrity

IssueImpactSolutionTrade-offs
Client Timestamps for LWWClock skew causes data loss; LWW cannot merge concurrent edits (e.g., two users typing in different paragraphs).Replace with CRDTs (Yjs, Automerge) or OT. Use server-assigned version vectors for ordering.High engineering complexity; larger message payloads (CRDT) or transformation logic (OT).
Per-Keystroke DB WritesPostgreSQL becomes write bottleneck; I/O saturation; latency spikes.Client-side batching (send every 500ms or 10 chars). Server-side buffering: queue changes → batch write to DB or dedicated write-optimized log (Apache Kafka → async DB persist).Risk of data loss if batch fails; requires client queue + retransmission logic.
Full HTML Snapshots Every 30sMassive storage bloat, write amplification, high DB cost.Store operation log (deltas only). Generate snapshots asynchronously to cheap object stores (S3). Use CRDT to reconstruct state.Adds recovery complexity; requires snapshot generation workers.

🌐 Real-Time Propagation

IssueImpactSolutionTrade-offs
Server-Limited Broadcast + 2s Polling2+ s delays to clients cross-server; DB read hammering; missed updates.Deploy Redis Pub/Sub or Kafka. On edit, publish to doc-specific Kafka topic. All servers sub to topics; broadcast instantly.Adds external infra dependency. Redis Pub/Sub = non-durable (OK for real-time); Kafka = durable but heavier footprint.
No Client Reconnection RecoveryLost edits during disconnect; stale UI after reconnect.Client buffers unsynced ops (IndexedDB). Server assigns monotonic version IDs. On reconnect: client sends last seen version; server sends missing ops (or full CRDT snapshot).Client-side state management; requires versioning logic.
No Sticky Sessions for WebSocketsReconnections routed randomly; broken state sync.Configure LB with session affinity (cookie or IP hash).Uneven server distribution (hotspots). Mitigate with connection limits + LB health checks.

📈 Scalability & Resilience

IssueImpactSolutionTrade-offs
Organization-Based PartitioningHot org → server overload; cold orgs wasteful.Document-level sharding with consistent hashing. Use service discovery (etcd/Zookeeper) to map doc → server.Higher routing complexity; requires dynamic partition management.
Primary DB Single Point of FailureFull system outage on master failure.PostgreSQL HA cluster (Patroni + streaming replication). Use write-through cache (Redis) for document state to reduce DB load.Failover latency (seconds); cache invalidation complexity.
Read Replica Staleness on Document LoadUI jumps as stale doc loads → real-time update arrives.Read initial doc from primary DB OR write-through Redis cache (updated via pub/sub on edit).Increases primary load; cache adds ops overhead.

🔄 Operational & Edge Cases

IssueImpactSolutionTrade-offs
No Offline SupportEdits lost during brief disconnects.Client buffers ops in IndexedDB. Sync on reconnect with conflict resolution.Increased frontend complexity; UX for conflict resolution.
No Document Access ValidationUsers could subscribe to unauthorized docs via WebSocket.On connection: validate user has access to document (via DB/cache). Subscribe only to permitted topics.Adds latency; requires permission cache with TTL/invalidation.
No Rate LimitingMalicious clients flood server with edits.Apply rate limiting at LB/gateway (e.g., max 10 ops/sec per user).Blocks legitimate fast typists; configure thresholds carefully.
Stateless JWT + Redis Session Cache MismatchAmbiguous session management (JWT stateless vs Redis cache).Clarify Redis is used for: (1) Pub/Sub (critical) and (2) Document state cache. Remove session storage from Redis.Eliminates confusion; aligns with JWT statelessness.

Summary of Foundational Shifts Required

  1. Replace LWW: Adopt CRDT/OT for correct, conflict-free merging.
  2. Eliminate Polling: Use Kafka/Redis Pub/Sub for O(1) real-time propagation.
  3. Rethink Persistence: Store deltas, not full snapshots; batch writes; async snapshotting.
  4. Secure Auth Flow: HttpOnly cookies + short-lived tokens; validate on WebSocket upgrade.
  5. Eliminate CDN Caching for Dynamic Content: Correctness over cache savings.
  6. Design for Failure: Client-side buffering, reconnection recovery, DB HA.

Trade-off Philosophy: Accept increased engineering complexity in exchange for correctness, scalability, and user trust. Real-time co-editing is a hard distributed systems problem; shortcuts (client clocks, polling, LWW) create fragility at scale. Invest in battle-tested patterns (CRDT, pub/sub, HA DB) to build a resilient product.

Debug This Architecture

Turn this model response into notes, narration, or a short video

Auto NotesTranscriptNarrateVideo Cut

Partner link

This output is part of our open dataset — 5K+ AI responses across 200 models

About Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking

Capabilities

ConversationReasoningCode GenerationAnalysisTool Use

Categories

TextCode

Specifications

Provider
Qwen
Released
2026-02-09
Size
XLARGE
Context
262,144 tokens

Keep exploring

SAME PROMPT

Claude Sonnet 4.6's version

Same prompt, different result

COMPARE

Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

Both outputs, side by side

Compare AI vibes, not scores. Side-by-side outputs across the world's best models.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Leaderboard
  • Challenges

Discover

  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • .llmignore
  • Badges
  • RIVAL Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival