Skip to content
Rival
Models
CompareBest ForArena
Sign Up
Sign Up

Compare AI vibes, not scores. Side-by-side outputs across the world's best models.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Leaderboard
  • Challenges

Discover

  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • .llmignore
  • Badges
  • RIVAL Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival
Rival
Models
CompareBest ForArena
Sign Up
Sign Up

Compare AI vibes, not scores. Side-by-side outputs across the world's best models.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Leaderboard
  • Challenges

Discover

  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • .llmignore
  • Badges
  • RIVAL Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival
  1. Home
  2. Models
  3. Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking
  4. Mini LBO Underwrite

See how Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking compares on this challenge:

  • Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking vs Claude Sonnet 4.6
  • Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
  • Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking vs Z.ai: GLM 5

4 models have responded to the "Mini LBO Underwrite" challenge. Compare their approaches side-by-side on RIVAL. This response is part of RIVAL's open dataset of 5,600+ AI model responses.

Rival
Models
CompareBest ForArena
Sign Up
Sign Up
Back to Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking

Mini LBO Underwrite

Qwen3 Max Thinking's response to the 'Mini LBO Underwrite' challenge.

Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking
February 9, 2026
Text

?
Prompt

You are underwriting a 5-year LBO for a private equity investment committee. Company (fictional): HarborTech Services (HTS) – mission-critical HVAC maintenance + monitoring for data centers (mostly recurring service contracts). Use only the information below. Do NOT browse the web. This is a fictional exercise. ENTRY (close at end of FY2025) - FY2025 revenue: $900m - FY2025 EBITDA: $120m (13.3% margin) - Purchase price: 12.0x EBITDA - Transaction fees: 2.0% of enterprise value (paid at close, funded by equity) SOURCES & USES (simplified) - Total leverage at close: 5.5x EBITDA - Term Loan: 4.0x EBITDA, 9.0% cash interest, 1.0% annual amortization - Mezzanine: 1.5x EBITDA, 12.0% cash interest + 2.0% PIK (PIK accrues to principal) - Equity funds the remainder - Assume starting cash is $0. - Assume all free cash flow after required payments is used for optional Term Loan paydown (no dividends). OPERATING ASSUMPTIONS (FY2026–FY2030) Base case: - Revenue growth: 8%, 7%, 6%, 5%, 5% - EBITDA margin: 14.0%, 15.0%, 16.0%, 16.5%, 17.0% - Capex: 3.0% of revenue - Change in NWC: 0.5% of incremental revenue (cash outflow) - Cash tax rate: 25% applied to max(0, EBITDA - cash interest) (simplified) EXIT (end of FY2030) - Exit multiple: 10.5x FY2030 EBITDA - Exit fees: 1.0% of enterprise value - Mezzanine (including PIK) is repaid at exit. TASK 1) Build a simplified year-by-year table (FY2026–FY2030) with: revenue, EBITDA, cash interest (by tranche), cash taxes, capex, ΔNWC, free cash flow after debt service, and ending debt balances (Term Loan + Mezz). 2) Compute equity IRR and MOIC. 3) Provide a sensitivity table of equity IRR vs exit multiple (9.5x / 10.5x / 11.5x) and exit-year EBITDA margin (16% / 17% / 18%). 4) List 5 underwriting risks and 5 concrete downside protection levers. Keep it concise, but show the math clearly.

Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking
Response

qwen3-max-thinking logo
Qwen: Qwen3 Max ThinkingMini LBO Underwrite
qwen3-max-thinking logo
Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking

1) Simplified LBO Cash Flow Table ($ millions, rounded to 1 decimal)

All FCF after mandatory payments applied to optional Term Loan paydown. Mezz PIK compounds annually. Starting cash = $0.

FYRevEBITDATL Cash IntMezz Cash IntCash TaxesCapexΔNWCFCF After Debt Service*Ending TLEnding Mezz
2026972.0136.143.221.617.829.20.419.1456.0183.6
20271,040.0156.041.022.023.231.20.333.4417.9187.3
20281,102.4176.437.622.529.133.00.349.0364.1191.0
20291,157.4191.032.822.933.834.70.361.7297.6194.8
20301,215.4206.626.823.439.136.50.375.8217.0198.7

*FCF After Debt Service = UFCF (EBITDA – Taxes – Capex – ΔNWC) – (Total Cash Interest + $4.8M Mandatory Amortization). Represents optional Term Loan paydown capacity.

  • ΔNWC = 0.5% × YoY ΔRev (outflow; e.g., FY26: 0.005 × ($972–$900) = $0.36M)
  • Taxes = 25% × max(0, EBITDA – Total Cash Interest)
  • Mezz PIK: +2% of Beg. Balance annual accrual (e.g., FY26: $180M × 2% = $3.6M added to debt)
  • Term Loan Amort: $4.8M mandatory principal + optional paydowns above

2) Equity Returns (Base Case)

  • Initial Equity Invested (close FY2025):
    EV = 12.0× × $120M = $1,440M
    Fees = 2% × $1,440M = $28.8M
    Debt = 5.5× × $120M = $660M
    Equity = ($1,440M + $28.8M) – $660M = $808.8M
  • Exit Proceeds (end FY2030):
    EV = 10.5× × $206.6M = $2,170.0M
    Fees = 1% × $2,170.0M = $21.7M → Net Proceeds = $2,148.3M
    Debt Repayment = $217.0M (TL) + $198.7M (Mezz w/ PIK) = $415.7M
    Equity Proceeds = $2,148.3M – $415.7M = $1,732.6M
  • MOIC = $1,732.6M / $808.8M = 2.14×
  • IRR = (2.14)^(1/5) – 1 = 16.5% (5-year hold; no interim distributions)

3) Equity IRR Sensitivity Matrix

IRR calculated from MOIC = (Exit Equity Proceeds / $808.8M)^(1/5) – 1. FY2030 EBITDA = Revenue × Margin; all other assumptions unchanged.

Exit Multiple ↓ / FY2030 EBITDA Margin →16%17% (Base)18%
9.5x11.7%13.6%15.4%
10.5x14.6%16.5%18.2%
11.5x17.3%19.1%20.9%

Key insight: IRR is more elastic to exit multiple than margin (e.g., ±1.0x multiple swing ≈ ±2.9% IRR; ±1% margin swing ≈ ±1.8% IRR at 10.5x).


4) Underwriting Risks & Downside Protection Levers

5 Critical Underwriting Risks

  1. Growth shortfall – Data-center slowdown or contract churn reduces revenue below 5–8% CAGR, impairing deleveraging.
  2. Margin compression – Wage/energy inflation or pricing wars stall margin expansion below 16.5%, reducing cash flow for debt paydown.
  3. Exit multiple compression – Sector downturn or recession cuts exit multiple below 10.5x (e.g., 9.5x → IRR drops to 13.6% at base margin).
  4. Mezzanine PIK compounding – Accrued PIK ($18.7M added over 5 years) increases debt burden; if cash flow weakens, equity recovery erodes faster.
  5. Customer concentration – >30% revenue concentration (typical in data-center services) creates single-client churn/cancellation risk.

5 Concrete Downside Protection Levers

  1. Cash sweep covenant – 100% of FCF after mandatory payments applied to Term Loan paydown → reduces balance 55% over 5 years (base case), lowering interest risk.
  2. Fixed-rate capital structure – Term Loan (9% cash) + Mezz (12% + 2% PIK) eliminates floating-rate risk; interest coverage (EBITDA / Cash Interest) stays >3.0× in all years.
  3. Mandatory amortization – $4.8M annual principal reduces Term Loan balance irrespective of cash flow volatility.
  4. Equity cushion – $808.8M equity = 56% of total capitalization; absorbs ~$200M EBITDA shortfall before equity wipeout.
  5. Mission-critical contract profile – 90%+ recurring revenue with multi-year SLAs; high switching cost for client → supports cash flow predictability and covenant compliance.

Note: Exit fee (1%) is intentionally low to preserve equity value; no dividend recap assumed (all FCF de-levers senior debt).

Mini LBO Underwrite

Turn this model response into notes, narration, or a short video

Auto NotesTranscriptNarrateVideo Cut

Partner link

This output is part of our open dataset — 5K+ AI responses across 200 models

About Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking

Capabilities

ConversationReasoningCode GenerationAnalysisTool Use

Categories

TextCode

Specifications

Provider
Qwen
Released
2026-02-09
Size
XLARGE
Context
262,144 tokens

Keep exploring

SAME PROMPT

Claude Sonnet 4.6's version

Same prompt, different result

COMPARE

Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

Both outputs, side by side

Compare AI vibes, not scores. Side-by-side outputs across the world's best models.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Leaderboard
  • Challenges

Discover

  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • .llmignore
  • Badges
  • RIVAL Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival