Skip to content
Rival
Models
CompareBest ForArena
Lab
Sign Up
Sign Up

We spend our weekends yelling at API endpoints so you don’t have to.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Prompt Lab
  • Image Generation
  • Audio Comparison
  • Leaderboard
  • Challenges

Discover

  • Insights
  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • .llmignore
  • Badges
  • Rival Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival · Built with mass sleep deprivation, energy drinks, and someone else’s GPU cluster
Rival
Models
CompareBest ForArena
Lab
Sign Up
Sign Up

We spend our weekends yelling at API endpoints so you don’t have to.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Prompt Lab
  • Image Generation
  • Audio Comparison
  • Leaderboard
  • Challenges

Discover

  • Insights
  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • .llmignore
  • Badges
  • Rival Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival · Built with mass sleep deprivation, energy drinks, and someone else’s GPU cluster

Qwen: Qwen3.5 35B A3B — Mini LBO Underwrite

  1. Home
  2. Models
  3. Qwen: Qwen3.5 35B A3B
  4. Mini LBO Underwrite

See how Qwen: Qwen3.5 35B A3B compares on this challenge:

  • Qwen: Qwen3.5 35B A3B vs Claude Sonnet 4.6
  • Qwen: Qwen3.5 35B A3B vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
  • Qwen: Qwen3.5 35B A3B vs Z.ai: GLM 5

4 models have responded to the "Mini LBO Underwrite" challenge. Compare their approaches side-by-side on Rival. This response is part of Rival's open dataset of 5,600+ AI model responses.

Rival
Models
CompareBest ForArena
Lab
Sign Up
Sign Up
Back to Qwen: Qwen3.5 35B A3B

Mini LBO Underwrite

Qwen3.5 35B A3B's response to the 'Mini LBO Underwrite' challenge.

Qwen: Qwen3.5 35B A3B
February 26, 2026
Text

?
Prompt

You are underwriting a 5-year LBO for a private equity investment committee. Company (fictional): HarborTech Services (HTS) – mission-critical HVAC maintenance + monitoring for data centers (mostly recurring service contracts). Use only the information below. Do NOT browse the web. This is a fictional exercise. ENTRY (close at end of FY2025) - FY2025 revenue: $900m - FY2025 EBITDA: $120m (13.3% margin) - Purchase price: 12.0x EBITDA - Transaction fees: 2.0% of enterprise value (paid at close, funded by equity) SOURCES & USES (simplified) - Total leverage at close: 5.5x EBITDA - Term Loan: 4.0x EBITDA, 9.0% cash interest, 1.0% annual amortization - Mezzanine: 1.5x EBITDA, 12.0% cash interest + 2.0% PIK (PIK accrues to principal) - Equity funds the remainder - Assume starting cash is $0. - Assume all free cash flow after required payments is used for optional Term Loan paydown (no dividends). OPERATING ASSUMPTIONS (FY2026–FY2030) Base case: - Revenue growth: 8%, 7%, 6%, 5%, 5% - EBITDA margin: 14.0%, 15.0%, 16.0%, 16.5%, 17.0% - Capex: 3.0% of revenue - Change in NWC: 0.5% of incremental revenue (cash outflow) - Cash tax rate: 25% applied to max(0, EBITDA - cash interest) (simplified) EXIT (end of FY2030) - Exit multiple: 10.5x FY2030 EBITDA - Exit fees: 1.0% of enterprise value - Mezzanine (including PIK) is repaid at exit. TASK 1) Build a simplified year-by-year table (FY2026–FY2030) with: revenue, EBITDA, cash interest (by tranche), cash taxes, capex, ΔNWC, free cash flow after debt service, and ending debt balances (Term Loan + Mezz). 2) Compute equity IRR and MOIC. 3) Provide a sensitivity table of equity IRR vs exit multiple (9.5x / 10.5x / 11.5x) and exit-year EBITDA margin (16% / 17% / 18%). 4) List 5 underwriting risks and 5 concrete downside protection levers. Keep it concise, but show the math clearly.

Qwen: Qwen3.5 35B A3B
Response

qwen3.5-35b-a3b logo
Qwen: Qwen3.5 35B A3BMini LBO Underwrite
qwen3.5-35b-a3b logo
Qwen: Qwen3.5 35B A3B

LBO Underwriting: HarborTech Services (HTS)

1. Financial Model Summary (FY2026–FY2030)

Entry Assumptions (FY2025 Close):

  • Revenue: $900m | EBITDA: $120m
  • Purchase Price: $1,440m ($120m × 12.0x)
  • Debt: $660m (TL $480m / Mezz $180m)
  • Equity Check: $780m (Purchase) + $28.8m (Fees) = $808.8m

Debt Terms:

  • Term Loan (TL): $480m @ 9% Cash Int, 1.0% Amort ($4.8m/yr).
  • Mezzanine: $180m @ 12% Cash Int + 2% PIK (accrues to principal).

Operating Assumptions:

  • Revenue Growth: 8%, 7%, 6%, 5%, 5%
  • EBITDA Margin: 14.0%, 15.0%, 16.0%, 16.5%, 17.0%
  • Capex: 3% Rev | NWC: 0.5% ΔRev | Tax: 25% (EBITDA - Cash Int)
($ in millions)FY2026FY2027FY2028FY2029FY2030
Revenue972.01,040.01,102.41,157.61,215.4
EBITDA Margin14.0%15.0%16.0%16.5%17.0%
EBITDA136.1156.0176.4191.0206.6
Cash Interest
Term Loan43.241.037.933.327.6
Mezzanine21.622.022.522.923.4
Mezz PIK3.63.73.73.83.9
Cash Taxes17.823.229.033.738.9
Capex29.231.233.134.736.5
ΔNWC0.43.43.12.82.9
FCF (Pre-Debt)88.798.2111.2119.8128.4
Mandatory Debt Service69.667.965.261.055.8
Optional TL Paydown19.130.346.058.872.6
Ending Debt Balances
Term Loan456.1421.0370.1306.5229.2
Mezzanine183.6187.3191.0194.8198.7
Total Net Debt639.7608.3561.1501.3427.9

Exit Calculation (FY2030):

  • Exit EV: $206.6m EBITDA × 10.5x = $2,169.6m
  • Exit Fees: 1.0% × $2,169.6m = $21.7m
  • Net Debt Repayment: $427.9m (TL $229.2m + Mezz $198.7m)
  • Equity Proceeds: $2,169.6m - $21.7m - $427.9m = $1,719.9m

2. Returns Analysis

MetricCalculationResult
Initial Equity CheckPurchase ($780m) + Fees ($28.8m)$808.8m
Final Equity ProceedsExit EV - Fees - Net Debt$1,720.0m
Equity MOIC$1,720.0 / $808.82.13x
Equity IRR$(1,720.0 / 808.8)^{1/5} - 1$16.3%

3. Sensitivity Analysis: Equity IRR

Assumption: Net Debt at Exit held constant at ~$428m for sensitivity isolation.

Exit Margin \ Multiple9.5x10.5x (Base)11.5x
16.0% (FY30)11.6%14.1%16.6%
17.0% (Base)14.1%16.3%18.5%
18.0% (FY30)16.8%19.0%21.1%

Sensitivity Math Example (16% Margin / 9.5x Multiple):

  1. FY30 EBITDA: $1,215.4m × 16% = $194.5m
  2. Exit EV: $194.5m × 9.5x = $1,847.5m
  3. Equity Proceeds: $1,847.5m - $21.7m (Fees) - $427.9m (Debt) = $1,397.9m
  4. IRR: $(1,397.9 / 808.8)^{1/5} - 1 = \mathbf{11.6%}$

4. Underwriting Risks & Protection Levers

Top 5 Risks

  1. Data Center Capex Cyclicality: HTS growth depends on client CAPEX. A slowdown in hyperscaler build-outs could stall revenue growth (8% base case is aggressive).
  2. Interest Rate Exposure: Term Loan is 9.0% cash interest (likely floating). Rate hikes increase debt service, reducing FCF available for paydown.
  3. Margin Compression: Labor inflation in HVAC maintenance is high. Base case assumes margin expansion (13.3% → 17.0%), which is risky if wage costs spike.
  4. Client Concentration: "Mission-critical" implies reliance on few large data center operators. Loss of a top 20% customer impacts revenue disproportionately.
  5. Mezzanine PIK Risk: 2% PIK increases debt burden annually. If FCF is lower than modeled, the Mezz balance grows, reducing equity proceeds at exit.

Top 5 Downside Protection Levers

  1. Mandatory Amortization: 1.0% TL amortization ensures principal reduction even if cash flow is tight.
  2. Contract Escalators: Embed CPI-linked or fixed annual price increases in service contracts to protect margins against inflation.
  3. Covenant Structure: Negotiate minimum DSCR (Debt Service Coverage Ratio) covenants that force optional paydown if EBITDA exceeds thresholds.
  4. Mezz Conversion Option: Include a provision to convert Mezzanine to Senior Debt or Equity if interest coverage falls below 1.5x.
  5. Diversified Verticals: Use 15% of annual Capex to fund R&D for non-data-center HVAC markets (e.g., Commercial, Industrial) to reduce client concentration risk.
Mini LBO Underwrite

Turn this model response into notes, narration, or a short video

Auto NotesTranscriptNarrateVideo Cut

Partner link

This output lives in our open dataset — 5K+ responses across 200 models. Take it. It’s free.

About Qwen: Qwen3.5 35B A3B

Capabilities

ConversationReasoningCode GenerationAnalysisTool UseAgentic Tool UseTranslation

Categories

TextCodeVisionMultimodal

Specifications

Provider
Qwen
Released
2026-02-25
Size
MEDIUM
Parameters
35B (3B active)
Context
262,144 tokens

Keep exploring

SAME PROMPT

Claude Sonnet 4.6's version

Same prompt, different result

COMPARE

Qwen: Qwen3.5 35B A3B vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

Both outputs, side by side

We spend our weekends yelling at API endpoints so you don’t have to.

@rival_tips

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Prompt Lab
  • Image Generation
  • Audio Comparison
  • Leaderboard
  • Challenges

Discover

  • Insights
  • AI Creators
  • AI Tools
  • The Graveyard

Developers

  • Developer Hub
  • MCP Server
  • .llmignore
  • Badges
  • Rival Datasets

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Sponsor
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
© 2026 Rival · Built with mass sleep deprivation, energy drinks, and someone else’s GPU cluster